Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Claude S Jr and Raenelle Aberne Testamentary Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$241k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 72% of THE CLAUDE S JR AND RAENELLE ABERNE TESTAMENTARY CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $69k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $172k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEIGHBORS NETWORK$40,000
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY$35,000
THE GREEN ROOM$32,000
LINC$27,500
JOHN'S RIVER VALLEY CAMP$17,000
CATAWBA COLLEGE$10,000
CATAWBA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FDN$10,000
CLASSROOM CONNECTIONS$9,000
CORINTH REFORMED CHURCH$9,000
CATAWBA VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$6,000
YOUNG LIFE$5,000
UNIVERSITY CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
SOLDIERS REUNION$5,000
HICKORY MUSIC FACTORY$5,000
CAROLINA THREAD TRAIL$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $218k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LINC: $28k → 12%LINC: $25k → 12%LINC: $25k → 12%LINC: $24k → 12%LINC: $21k → 12%LINC: $18k → 12%LINC: $14k → 12%LINC: $14k → 12%DOWNTOWN NEWTON DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIA: $9k → 12%DOWNTOWN NEWTON DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIA: $6k → 12%DOWNTOWN NEWTON DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIA: $6k → 12%DOWNTOWN NEWTON DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIA: $6k → 12%DOWNTOWN NEWTON DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIA: $6k → 12%NEWTON DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $3k → 12%DOWNTOWN NEWTON DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIA: $3k → 12%NEWTON DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $3k → 12%DOWNTOWN NEWTON DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIA: $1k → 12%YMCA OF CATAWBA VALLEY: $4k → 12%UNIQUE WORLD GIFTS: $3k → 12%UNIQUE WORLD GIFTS: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 33 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
13

Total granted

$2.1M
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+18%

Still filing today

52%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NN
    NEIGHBORS NETWORK INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $349k · revenue +218% · 31% of their budget
  • LI
    LINC INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $168k · revenue +169%
  • WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $124k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • TT
    TRAIN THEM UP CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • HM
    HICKORY MUSEUM OF ART INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arts Center of Coastal Carolina

To provide cultural enrichment on hilton head island and enable residents and visitors to have access to cultural activities.

Arts & Culture
2
Harrells Christian Academy

The mission of harrells christian academy is to prepare each student for higher education within an environment that instills judeo-christian values, fosters self-discipline, enhances creativity, and promises a love and respect for…

Education
3
Hiwassee College

A liberal arts college founded in 1849 and associated with the united methodist church, providing quality education for all students in an atomosphere that promotes intellectual pursuit, spiritual growth and personal responsibility.

4
Woodstock History Center Inc

Sharing and preserving the history of woodstock vt through inspiring educational experiences and dynamic collections

Arts & Culture
5
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
6
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
7
Woods Charter School

Operation of a north carolina public charter school

Education
8
Wingate University

The mission of wingate university is to develop educated, ethical, and productive global citizens. following its judeo-christian heritage, the university seeks to cultivate the following in its students: knowledge, faith, and service.

Education
9
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
10
Cultural and Heritage Commission

Culture and heritage commission (cmh) is a family of museums in york county, sc, which includes historic brattonsville, the mccelvey center, the museum of york county and the main street children's museum in old town rock hill. its vision…

Arts & Culture
11
Barton College

Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…

Education
12
Performing Arts Center Inc

To provide high quality venues and performing arts for the Highlands - Cashiers community.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hickory Music Factory Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-12 SchoolsClassical Music EnsemblesResidential Care and Suppor…International Christian Min…University Athletic & Schol…Homeless Services & HousingCommunity Arts OrganizationsLocal Community Organizatio…Youth Education & Enrichment
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%10%<5yr16%10%5–10yr18%10%10–20yr15%25%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr13%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%3%<5yr16%18%5–10yr18%45%10–20yr15%17%20–35yr13%2%35–55yr13%15%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%1/26
the rest of the field
14%
585/4,109

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CORINTH REFORMED CHURCH — $360,304 · OtherCORINTH REFORMED CHURCHNEIGHBORS NETWORK INC — $349,418 · OtherNEIGHBORS NETWORK INCCLASSROOM CONNECTIONS — $145,500 · OtherCLASSROOM CONNECTIONSTHE GREEN ROOM — $130,440 · OtherTHE GREEN ROOMJOHN'S RIVER VALLEY CAMP — $118,100 · OtherJOHN'S RIVER VALLEY CAMPIndividual grant recipient — $95,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+24 more — $358,594 · Other+24 moreWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $124,000 · EducationWAKE FOREST U…CATAWBA COLLEGE — $104,000 · EducationCATAWBA COLLE…UNIVERSITY CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL — $19,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY CH…+1 more — $6,000 · EducationLINC INC — $167,500 · Human ServicesLINC INCDowntown Newton Development Association — $42,200 · Human ServicesDowntown Ne…+2 more — $8,000 · Human ServicesHICKORY MUSIC FACTORY INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureNEWTON DEPOT AUTHORITY — $14,800 · Arts & CultureWESTERN PIEDMONT SYMPHONY INC — $10,500 · Arts & CultureHICKORY MUSEUM OF ART INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Harp Society Inc — $5,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $500 · Arts & CultureYOUNG LIFE — $52,500 · Youth DevelopmentHART SQUARE FOUNDATION INC — $21,500 · PhilanthropyPREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC — $5,300 · Health
Other$1,558,256Education$253,000Human Services$217,700Arts & Culture$60,800Youth Development$52,500Philanthropy$21,500Health$5,300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEIGHBORS NETWORK INC — $349,418 over 8y, 31% of budgetLINC INC — $167,500 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetCLASSROOM CONNECTIONS — $145,500 over 8y, 40% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $124,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCATAWBA COLLEGE — $104,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $52,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDowntown Newton Development Association — $42,200 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetHART SQUARE FOUNDATION INC — $21,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetHICKORY MUSIC FACTORY INC — $20,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetCAROLINA THREAD TRAIL — $16,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetNEWTON DEPOT AUTHORITY — $14,800 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetWESTERN PIEDMONT SYMPHONY INC — $10,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetHICKORY MUSEUM OF ART INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetASHEVILLE SCHOOL INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC — $5,300 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetUNIQUE WORLD GIFTS INC — $4,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetHICKORY LANDMARKS SOCIETY INC — $4,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CATAWBA VALLEY INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPIEDMONT COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 420 — $3,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CORNER TABLE INC — $700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetADULT LIFE PROGRAMS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED ARTS COUNCIL OF CATAWBA COUNTY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEIGHBORS NETWORK INC
  • Who funds LINC INC
  • Who funds CLASSROOM CONNECTIONS
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CATAWBA COLLEGE
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds Downtown Newton Development Association
  • Who funds HART SQUARE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HICKORY MUSIC FACTORY INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL
  • Who funds CAROLINA THREAD TRAIL
  • Who funds NEWTON DEPOT AUTHORITY
  • Who funds WESTERN PIEDMONT SYMPHONY INC
  • Who funds HICKORY MUSEUM OF ART INC
  • Who funds ASHEVILLE SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC
  • Who funds American Harp Society Inc
  • Who funds UNIQUE WORLD GIFTS INC
  • Who funds HICKORY LANDMARKS SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CATAWBA VALLEY INC
  • Who funds PIEDMONT COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 420

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George Foundation IncNC32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George Foundation Inc · Beaver Family Foundation Inc · The Bolick Foundation · Underdown Family Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Corning Incorporated Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · Tsh Charitable Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Harold and Margaret Deal Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · United Arts Council of Catawba County Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Claude S Jr and Raenelle Aberne Testamentary Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph