Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Cielo Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$8.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
34
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$8.5M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

97% of The Cielo Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’19
4
’20
1
’21
2
’22
1
’23
3
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$37MEducation$1.1MHealth$354kPublic Benefit$150kScience & Tech$71kCrime & Legal$17kArts & Culture$7kEmployment$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k29 grants · $108k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $74k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $54k
  • $250k+1 grant · $8.5M
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$69M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$8,525,000
Individual grant recipient$53,800
CDL SCHOOL - UNITED STATES TRUCK DRIVING$39,805
ACCENT BEAUTY$23,250
GALS INC$10,861
Individual grant recipient$9,295
SCHOOL OF BOTANICAL & MEDICAL AESTHETICS$8,590
IBMC COLLEGE$8,590
ATI HOME IMPROVEMENT$7,860
I HAVE A DREAM$7,348
FRONT RANGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$7,207
Individual grant recipient$6,980
EMILY GRIFFITH TECHNICAL COLLEGE$6,908
LASH & CO LASH COMPANY EDUCATION$6,760
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$5,460
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SECOND CHANCE CENTER: $16k → 8%SECOND CHANCE CENTER: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MT
IL
NY
WY
CA
CO
KY
AZ
KS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$728k · 18 repeat orgs$947k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +458% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
40

Total granted

$728k
$815k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+458%
+22%

Still filing today

6%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $132k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    IBMC COLLEGE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $216k
  • TG
    TECHTONIC GROUP INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $120k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $62k

Funded once

  • WM
    WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL
    one grant, 2020 · $250k
  • MF
    MAYORS FUND TO ADVANCE NYC
    one grant, 2020 · $150k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +76%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
4
Colorado State University Foundation

See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…

Education
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
9
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
10
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
11
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
12
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boulder Community Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Beyond the Boroughs Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $36,518,500 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDWEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL: $250,000 · OtherIBMC COLLEGE: $215,838 · OtherMAYORS FUND TO ADVANCE NYC: $150,000 · OtherTECHTONIC GROUP INC: $120,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $62,200 · OtherLINCOLN COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $61,457 · OtherCONCORDE CAREER COLLEGE: $55,912 · Other+65 more: $508,891 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationTURING SCHOOL OF SOFTWARE AND DESIG: $10,000 · EducationGrand Canyon University: $10,000 · EducationCornell University: $5,460 · Education+2 more: $5,078 · EducationBOULDER COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $100,000 · HealthSecond Chance Center Inc: $16,864 · Human ServicesLatino Leadership Institute: $3,500 · Arts & Culture
Community Improvement$36,518,500Other$1,424,298Education$130,538Health$100,000Human Services$16,864Arts & Culture$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $36,518,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOULDER COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSecond Chance Center Inc: $16,864 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTURING SCHOOL OF SOFTWARE AND DESIG: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGrand Canyon University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $5,460 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE WRITERS WORKSHOP INC: $3,878 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBAL TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION INC: $3,149 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEYOND THE BOROUGHS INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOULDER COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Second Chance Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds TURING SCHOOL OF SOFTWARE AND DESIG ↗
  • Who funds Grand Canyon University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rose Community FoundationCO15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rose Community Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Cielo Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cielo Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cielo’s filings →

    More from the funding graph