Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Christine and Jaime Yordan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$208k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$663kArts & Culture$133kHealth$67kReligion$65kSocial Science$45kEnvironment$44kAnimals$38kPhilanthropy$27kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $158k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLY CROSS CHURCH$50,000
TRUSTEES OF HAMILTON COLLEGE$30,000
HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL$25,000
MOUNT VERNON LADIES ASSOCIATION$25,000
MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE$20,000
THE HILL SCHOOL$15,000
CLEVELAND CLINIC INDIAN RIVER FOUNDATION$12,500
MARDY FISH CHILDREN FOUNDATION$10,000
HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY$10,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOMELESS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%A CARING CENTER FOR WOMEN: $500 → 12%GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
ID
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
WV
VA
MD
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$664k · 15 repeat orgs$201k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
38

Total granted

$664k
$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+19%

Still filing today

67%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    President and Fellows of Middlebury College
    3× · 2022–2025 · $55k · revenue +3%
  • TN
    THE NEW CANAAN LIBRARY INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $35k · revenue +15%
  • VB
    VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k · revenue +610%

Funded once

  • CL
    COMMUNITY LEAGUE OF THE HEIGHTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +52%
  • Atlantic Salmon Federation (US) Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • THE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +24%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

3
Harvard Club of Washington Dc

To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.

Education
4
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
5
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
6
The Frick Collection

The Frick Collection (the "Collection") operates an internationally recognized art museum and library program for the inspiration and enjoyment of the public and for the advancement of the study of fine arts and kindred subjects.

7
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
8
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
9
Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute

See schedule o for the organization's mission statement.please see description for part i, line 1, above.

Arts & Culture
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
12
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Garden Club of America and the most unlike its peers is Upper Missouri Waterkeeper Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Health CentersCommunity Arts OrganizationsLand Conservation Organizat…Youth Sports Booster Organi…Professional Ballet Compani…Pregnancy Support ServicesUnited Way FederationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Public Library SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Independent K-8 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 55 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%25%10–20yr19%18%20–35yr13%7%35–55yr16%50%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%2%10–20yr19%1%20–35yr13%2%35–55yr16%95%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,726

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
20/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE HILL SCHOOL — $335,000 · EducationTHE HILL SCHOOLTrustees of Hamilton College — $225,000 · EducationTrustees of Hamilton CollegePresident and Fellows of Middlebury College — $55,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Middlebury CollegeTHE NEW CANAAN LIBRARY INC — $35,000 · Education+2 more — $11,300 · EducationMOUNT VERNON LADIES ASSOCIATION — $66,000 · OtherMOUNT VERNON LADIES ASSOCIATI…HOLY CROSS CHURCH — $50,000 · OtherHOLY CROSS CHURCHHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL — $45,000 · OtherHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOLTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $25,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYISLEMON CAMARADERIE FOUNDATION — $15,000 · OtherHOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY — $10,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH — $10,000 · OtherTHE MARDY FISH CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · Other+28 more — $42,700 · Other+28 moreINDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · Health+1 more — $250 · HealthTHE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION — $25,000 · Arts & CultureVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC — $15,000 · Arts & Culture564 PARK AVENUE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION — $3,000 · Arts & CultureBALLET VERO BEACH INC — $2,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $1,100 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY LEAGUE OF THE HEIGHTS INC — $25,000 · Community ImprovementAtlantic Salmon Federation (US) Inc — $25,000 · AnimalsRiver Oaks Garden Club — $5,500 · EnvironmentPATAGONIAN LAND CONSERVATION TRUST INC — $5,000 · EnvironmentMCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $5,000 · EnvironmentTHE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA — $2,000 · Environment+1 more — $500 · Environment
Education$661,300Other$288,700Health$50,250Arts & Culture$46,100Community Improvement$25,000Animals$25,000Environment$18,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE HILL SCHOOL — $335,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTrustees of Hamilton College — $225,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College — $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW CANAAN LIBRARY INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEAGUE OF THE HEIGHTS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAtlantic Salmon Federation (US) Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MARDY FISH CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetTHE WINDSOR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $10,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRiver Oaks Garden Club — $5,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget564 PARK AVENUE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBALLET VERO BEACH INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOMELESS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetForum of Civics Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUpper Missouri Waterkeeper Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERSHIP WITH CHILDREN INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBayou Bend Gardens Endowment — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S CARE CENTER OF IRC INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Houston — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF AMERICAN FINANCE — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARVARD MAGAZINE INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

James S Peterson FoundationNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: James S Peterson Foundation · Indian River Community Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Quail Valley Charities Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Christine and Jaime Yordan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College1% of income from government
  • Ballet Vero Beach Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph