Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Chester Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$729k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$375k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$3.6MHuman Services$632kPhilanthropy$220kReligion$170kArts & Culture$167kHealth$125kHousing & Shelter$95kInternational$80kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $206k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $120k
  • $250k+1 grant · $375k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ACADEMY FOR TEACHING AND LEARNI$375,000
CLEMSON UNIV FOUNDATION$120,000
CHESTER CO PUBLIC ED FDTN$30,750
CHESTER AREA UNITED WAY$25,000
CHRIST CENTRAL CENTER OF HOPE$20,000
SALVATION ARMY$20,000
THE TURNING POINT OF CHESTER$20,000
GRASP$20,000
CHESTER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
CHESTER COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
HOSPICE COMMUNITY CARE$10,000
FORT LAWN COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
FLLWSHP OF CHRSTN ATHLTS$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UPPER PALMETTO YMCA: $10k → 18%UPPER PALMETTO YMCA: $10k → 18%UPPER PALMETTO YMCA: $10k → 18%UPPER PALMETTO YMCA: $10k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.9M · 27 repeat orgs$600k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
9

Total granted

$4.9M
$220k

Still filing today

30%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $380k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    CLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $935k · revenue +143%
  • WU
    Winthrop University Foundation
    2× · 2017–2018 · $155k · revenue +120%
  • TT
    THE TURNING POINT OF CHESTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $135k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • II
    I58 INC HOUSING INTIATIVE
    one grant, 2023 · $90k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $75k
  • SP
    SAMARITANS PURSE - UKRAINE
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Young Men's Christian Association of Chambersburg Pa

See schedule o for form 990, part iii, line 1 - organization's mission

—
2
Portersville Christian School

The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…

Education
3
Chatham University

Chatham university prepares women and men to be world ready: to build lives of purpose and value and fulfilling work. (see continuation on schedule o)in addition to appropriate professional skills and liberal arts learning, chatham…

Education
4
Walnut Grove Christian School

We are a k-12 christian school founded under the following (4) pillars: academics: we provide an amazing accredited academic program utilizing 100% certified teachers. schedule: we provide our students and their families an opportunity on…

Education
5
The South Carolina Historical Society

The schs mission is to expand, preserve, and make accessible our invaluable collection, and to encourage interest and pride in the rich history of our state.

Arts & Culture
6
Church Women United

Jesus commanded, "love your neighbor as yourself." (mark 12:31) our ministry provides loving service to the poor and hungry. the organization will operate an ecumenical food pantry to serve those who need food assistance in york county and…

—
7
Lancaster County Society for Historical Preservation Inc

The Lancaster County Society for Historical Preservation LCSHPs mission is to preserve and protect buildings and sites of historic interest in Lancaster County SC; to advance historic preservation as an instrument of economic and social…

—
8
Clemson Free Clinic

To deliver high-quality medical care and essential pharmaceuticals with unwavering compassion and respect. we focus our efforts on individuals aged 12 to 64 who find themselves without the safety net of medicaid, medicare, or any other…

Health
9
Chester Area Christian Food Pantry Inc

Provide food & aid for people in need

Food & Nutrition
10
John Jay Institute for Faith Society and Law Inc

To prepare principled leaders for faith-informed public service.

Religion
11
Mcleod Health

To operate a health care system providing medical excellence to the eastern region of south carolina and the extreme southeastern region of north carolina.

Health
12
First Methodist Church

The methodist church is a global denomination that opens hearts, opens minds and opens doors through active engagement with our world. the mission of the methodist church is to make disciples of jesus christ for the transformation of the…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clemson University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $1,200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE ACADEMY FOR TEACHING AND LEARNI: $375,000 · OtherTHE ACADEMY FOR TEACHING AND LEARNICHESTER CO PUBLIC ED FDTN: $340,750 · OtherCHESTER CO PUBLIC ED FDTNTRI COUNTY TECH FOUNDATION: $304,000 · OtherTRI COUNTY TECH FOUNDATIONCHESTER AREA UNITED WAY: $220,000 · OtherCHESTER AREA UNITED WAYIndividual grant recipient: $217,500 · OtherCHESTER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $167,000 · OtherCHRIST CENTRAL CENTER OF HOPE: $160,000 · Other+24 more: $1,139,600 · Other+24 moreCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $935,000 · EducationCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOU…Winthrop University Foundation: $155,000 · EducationWinthrop University Fo…G R A S P: $95,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $55,000 · ReligionFORT LAWN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $49,000 · Public BenefitUPPER PALMETTO YMCA INC: $40,000 · Human Services
Other$4,123,850Education$1,090,000Religion$150,000Public Benefit$49,000Human Services$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $935,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $167,000 over 7y, 52% of budgetWinthrop University Foundation: $155,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTHE TURNING POINT OF CHESTER INC: $135,000 over 8y, 11% of budgetG R A S P: $95,000 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $55,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFORT LAWN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $49,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetUPPER PALMETTO YMCA INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHESTER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Winthrop University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE TURNING POINT OF CHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds G R A S P ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds FORT LAWN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UPPER PALMETTO YMCA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Chester County InSC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Chester County In · Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Chester Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Chester Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chester’s filings →

    More from the funding graph