Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Chertkof Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$27k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

International$100kReligion$62kEducation$22kPhilanthropy$13kFood & Nutrition$4kHealth$3kCivil Rights$2kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$521k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETH EL CONGREGATION$10,500
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$10,172
BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY$5,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$1,000
BALTIMORE ZIONIST DISTRICT$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNIT 669: $500 → 16%BALTIMORE HUNGER PROJECT: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$77k · 7 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
17

Total granted

$77k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+32%

Still filing today

57%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalCrime & LegalEnvironmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Bucknell University
    2× · 2023–2024 · $6k · revenue +12%
  • BZ
    BALTIMORE ZIONIST DISTRICT INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $1k · revenue +53%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    2× · 2020–2021 · $1k · revenue +211%

Funded once

  • RP
    ROLAND PARK COUNTRY SCHOOL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +26%
  • TG
    THE GREENMOUNT SCHOOL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +35%
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

2
Bullis School

Bullis school provides a student-centered balanced experience in academics, arts, athletics and community service. bullis uniquely prepares all students to become caring citizens and creative, critical thinkers who will thrive in…

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

4
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
5
The Boys' Latin School of Maryland Inc

The boys' latin school of maryland is a college prep school for boys, grades k - 12.

Education
6
The Maryland School for the Blind

As a statewide resource center, the school provides outreach, educational and residential services for students to reach their fullest potential by preparing them to be as successful, independent, and well-rounded contributing members of…

Education
7
Bernard Zell Anshe Emet Day School

To develop exceptional young people who put jewish values into action.

Education
8
Luria Academy of Brooklyn

Luria academy is a child-centered environment dedicated to academic excellence and a sophisticated knowledge of jewish text and jewish heritage. located in the prospect heights neighborhood of brookly, luria academy is a jewish…

Education
9
Brooklyn Law School

To provide students with the knowledge, skills, ethical values needed for a career in law.

Education
10
The Waldorf School of Baltimore Inc

The waldorf school of baltimore educates and inspires children to think, act, and feel with depth, imagination, and purpose.

11
The Branson School

To provide an academically exceptional education to students grade 9 through 12 in a warm, supportive, and nurturing environment.

Education
12
Beit Rabban Day School

Beit rabban's mission is to nurture our children to be critical and creative thinkers, responsible world citizens, deeply fluent in jewish texts, hebrew language, the humanities and the sciences, respectful of a multiplicity of views, and…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baltimore Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Audubon Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
14/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $98,972 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC+1 more — $1,000 · InternationalBETH EL CONGREGATION — $57,500 · OtherBETH EL CONGREGATIONASSOCIATED JEWISH CHARITIES — $8,000 · OtherASSOCIATED JEWISH CHARITIESTHE GREENMOUNT SCHOOL INC — $3,000 · Other+12 more — $11,100 · Other+12 moreROLAND PARK COUNTRY SCHOOL INC — $10,000 · EducationROLAND PA…Bucknell University — $6,000 · EducationBucknell …BALTIMORE LAB SCHOOL INC — $1,000 · EducationBALTIMORE…+1 more — $200 · EducationBALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $4,635 · PhilanthropySOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $2,000 · Crime & LegalBALTIMORE HUNGER PROJECT LLC — $1,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNIT 669 INC — $500 · Human ServicesALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000 · HealthNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $1,000 · Environment
International$99,972Other$79,600Education$17,200Philanthropy$4,635Crime & Legal$2,000Human Services$1,500Health$1,000Environment$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $98,972 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetROLAND PARK COUNTRY SCHOOL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBucknell University — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $4,635 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREENMOUNT SCHOOL INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE ZIONIST DISTRICT INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBALTIMORE HUNGER PROJECT LLC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE LAB SCHOOL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNIT 669 INC — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGILMAN SCHOOL INCORPORATED — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY11.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Chertkof Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph