· Private foundation
The Charlotte Haynes Robuck Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOMEWARD BOUND | $7,700 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $7,500 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $6,545 |
| ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITA | $6,000 |
| CHRIST COMMUNITY HEALTH S | $4,500 |
| HERITAGE ACADEMY | $4,000 |
| BELOVED ASHEVILLE | $4,000 |
| RIVERLINK | $3,725 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| OPEN DOORS OR ASHVILLE | $2,720 |
| COUNCIL ON AGING | $2,700 |
| SORBA | $1,300 |
| MURPHY-HARPST CHILDRENS CENTER | $1,145 |
| WJCT | $1,000 |
| ACCESS FUND | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HBHOMEWARD BOUND OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC9× · 2017–2025 · $77k · revenue +136%
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC9× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue +145%- BCBARNABAS CENTER INC4× · 2018–2021 · $30k · revenue +110%
Funded once
- BCBARNABUS CENTERone grant, 2017 · $6k
- CECRAFT EMERGENCY FUNDone grant, 2024 · $6k
- TSTAKE STOCK IN CHILDRENNASSAU LEADERSHIP COUNCILone grant, 2017 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To support the mission of westminster-canterbury on chesapeake bay
Provide food, shelter, rehabilitation and christian ministry to the poor and homeless
The Children's Home Society of North Carolina's mission is to promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.
Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
The mission of augusta health is to strengthen the health and well-being of all people in our communities.
The mission of the atlantic coast conservancy is to provide 21st century solutions and sound scientific applications for conservation of critical natural resources in the face of a changing climate, focusing on the southeasthern united…
Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.
Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.
Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…
Methodist Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health regardless of a patient's ability to pay.
Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homeward Bound of Western North Carolina Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ocean Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOMEWARD BOUND OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds BARNABAS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds RiverLink Inc ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds NATHANAEL GREENE ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds CHRIST COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES AUGUSTA INC ↗
- Who funds Open Doors of Asheville Inc ↗
- Who funds WJCT INC ↗
- Who funds Southern Appalachian Highlands Conservancy ↗
- Who funds BELOVED ASHEVILLE ↗
- Who funds MISSION ON THE MOVE INC ↗
- Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
- Who funds WESTERN N CAROLINA PUBLIC RADIO ↗
- Who funds MURPHY-HARPST CHILDREN'S CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE ACCESS FUND ↗
- Who funds TSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds PENOBSCOT BAY YMCA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Richard Eckerd Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · The Frances & William H Beattie Fdn · Fernandez Pave the Way Foundation · The Community Foundation for the Central Savannah River Area Inc · Dogwood Health Trust · Foundation for the Carolinas · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Charlotte Haynes Robuck Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Tsic Inc Dba/Take Stock in Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.