Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Charles Jacob Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$65kArts & Culture$61kEmployment$30kInternational$24kYouth Development$19kHealth$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$13kHousing & Shelter$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$226k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIFT - CHICAGO$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
WOMEN EMPLOYED$5,000
VIRGINIA CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS$5,000
ONE HEALTH$4,000
LIVING TRADITIONS$2,500
OLD TOWN SCHOOL OF FOLK MUSIC$2,500
MARWEN$2,500
MY BLOCK MY HOOD MY CITY$2,000
CRIVITZ YOUTH CENTER$1,000
OPEN STUDIO PROJECT$1,000
REFUGEE ONE$1,000
TASTE FOR THE HOMELESS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%KIDIZENSHIP: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
WI
NY
KY
VA
AZ
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$277k · 14 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
9

Total granted

$277k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+1%

Still filing today

64%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalEmploymentYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LI
    LIFT INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $65k · revenue +131%
  • WE
    WOMEN EMPLOYED
    6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +0%
  • OT
    OLD TOWN SCHOOL OF FOLK MUSIC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +36%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +1%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    one grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Chicago Food Depository

The greater chicago food depository is the nonprofit food bank serving cook county. our mission - is to end hunger. we believe food is a basic human right. to achieve our mission, we work in partnership with a network of community-based…

Food & Nutrition
2
World Music Institute Inc

World music institute is committed to presenting the best in traditional and contemporary music and dance from around the world to enrich lives through the arts, promote awareness and appreciation of the worlds rich cultural traditions and…

Arts & Culture
3
Women First Inc

Women first invests in grassroots initiatives driven by women and girls in developing economies that sustainably advance their lives.

International
4
International Women's Forum Inc

The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…

Education
5
Global Poverty Project Inc

Our mission is to build a movement of global citizens whose actions will help achieve our vision of a world without extreme poverty.

Social Science
6
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
7
United States Artists Inc

To invest in america's finest artists and illuminate the value of artists to society.

Arts & Culture
8
Women's Business Enterprise National Council

Wbenc's mission is to fuel economic growth globally by identifying, certifying, and facilitating the development of women-owned businesses.

Civil Rights
9
Cultural Vistas Inc

Cultural vistas leverages the power of international exchange to connect lives, enhance global skills, and drive positive change.

International
10
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
11
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
12
New York Foundation for the Arts Inc

Established in 1971, the mission of the new york foundation for the arts (nyfa) is to empower artists in all disciplines, as well as cultural workers, to achieve success on their own terms by providing critical support, resources, and…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Old Town School of Folk Music; the most unlike its peers is Open Studio Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMARWEN: $15,000 · OtherMARWENIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCRIVITZ YOUTH CENTER: $7,000 · OtherCRIVITZ YOUTH CENTERJALOPY THEATRE SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $5,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY HEALTH: $4,000 · OtherREFUGEEONE: $6,000 · OtherREFUGEEONE+5 more: $6,500 · Other+5 moreLIFT INC: $65,000 · EmploymentLIFT INCWOMEN EMPLOYED: $30,000 · EmploymentWOMEN EMPLOYEDVIRGINIA CENTER FOR THE CREATIVE ARTS: $30,000 · Arts & CultureVIRGINIA CENTER FOR…OLD TOWN SCHOOL OF FOLK MUSIC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureOLD TOWN SCHOOL OF …LIVING TRADITIONS INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureLIVING TRADITIONS I…+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $12,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRA…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $12,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SAN…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $12,000 · InternationalUNITED STATE…Role Model Movement Inc (NFP): $12,000 · Youth DevelopmentBIGHORN VALLEY HEALTH CENTER INC: $8,000 · HealthTaste For The Homeless: $6,000 · Community Improvement
Other$111,500Employment$95,000Arts & Culture$56,000International$36,000Youth Development$12,000Health$8,000Community Improvement$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFT INC: $65,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetVIRGINIA CENTER FOR THE CREATIVE ARTS: $30,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWOMEN EMPLOYED: $30,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetOLD TOWN SCHOOL OF FOLK MUSIC: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRole Model Movement Inc (NFP): $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING TRADITIONS INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBIGHORN VALLEY HEALTH CENTER INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTaste For The Homeless: $6,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetREFUGEEONE: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKIDIZENSHIP INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetOPEN STUDIO PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetI Grow Chicago NFP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIFT INC ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA CENTER FOR THE CREATIVE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN EMPLOYED ↗
  • Who funds OLD TOWN SCHOOL OF FOLK MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds Role Model Movement Inc (NFP) ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds LIVING TRADITIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds BIGHORN VALLEY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Taste For The Homeless ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEEONE ↗
  • Who funds KIDIZENSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN STUDIO PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds I Grow Chicago NFP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL12× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Charles Jacob Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Charles Jacob Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Charles Jacob Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Charles Jacob Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charles Jacob’s filings →

    More from the funding graph