Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Certe Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$175kRecreation & Sports$31kReligion$31kHuman Services$30kAnimals$15kHousing & Shelter$15kHealth$8kPublic Benefit$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$228k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DAWG NATION HOCKEY FOUNDATION$5,000
STEP DENVER$5,000
PITZER COLLEGE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
JUDAISM YOUR WAY$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 12%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 12%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
OR
IN
CA
CO
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$298k · 10 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +69% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
11

Total granted

$298k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+31%

Still filing today

80%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesReligionAnimalsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    Pitzer College
    8× · 2017–2025 · $142k · revenue +49%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF DENVER
    3× · 2017–2022 · $33k · revenue +33%
  • DN
    DAWG Nation Hockey Foundation
    8× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +140%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • MH
    MEDICINE HORSE PROGRAMgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +31%
  • TC
    THE CHRIS HARRIS JR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
2
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
3
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

4
Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

5
Step Springs

Step Springs is a subsidiary organization of Step Denver and when it opens in 2025 will be the first replication of the Step program. Step is a residential recovery community that gives men with nowhere else to turn the opportunity to…

Housing & Shelter
6
Colorado State University Foundation

See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…

Education
7
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
8
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
9
The Colorado Humane Society & Spca Inc

See schedule o.to prevent cruelty and neglect of animals within the state of colorado by:-assisting agencies in the enforcement of laws relating to cruelty and neglect of companion animals and equines-educating the public on animal welfare…

10
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
11
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
12
Disability Rights Washington

Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Dumb Friends League and the most unlike its peers is Dawg Nation Hockey Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Pitzer College — $142,000 · EducationPitzer CollegeUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $32,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DENVERStep Denver — $14,500 · OtherStep DenverIndividual grant recipient — $6,000 · OtherIndividual gr…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES — $5,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY…Individual grant recipient — $3,000 · OtherIndividual gr…THE CHRIS HARRIS JR FOUNDATION — $2,500 · OtherTHE CHRIS HAR…THE CHRIS HARRIS FOUNDATION — $2,500 · OtherTHE CHRIS HAR…CHRIST THE SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCH — $2,000 · Other+3 more — $3,500 · Other+3 moreDAWG Nation Hockey Foundation — $31,000 · HealthDAWG Nation …MEDICINE HORSE PROGRAM — $5,000 · HealthMEDICINE HOR…+1 more — $500 · HealthJUDAISM YOUR WAY — $28,500 · ReligionJUDAISM YO…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesDENVER RESCUE MISSION — $5,000 · Human ServicesDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE — $15,000 · AnimalsCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $2,000 · InternationalSUNRISE MOVEMENT EDUCATION FUND — $2,000 · Environment
Education$174,500Other$39,000Health$36,500Religion$28,500Human Services$25,000Animals$15,000International$2,000Environment$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPitzer College — $142,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $32,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDAWG Nation Hockey Foundation — $31,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetJUDAISM YOUR WAY — $28,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE — $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetStep Denver — $14,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICINE HORSE PROGRAM — $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE MOVEMENT EDUCATION FUND — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALS UNITED ROCKY MOUNTAIN — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Pitzer College
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER
  • Who funds DAWG Nation Hockey Foundation
  • Who funds JUDAISM YOUR WAY
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC
  • Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE
  • Who funds Step Denver
  • Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds MEDICINE HORSE PROGRAM
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
  • Who funds SUNRISE MOVEMENT EDUCATION FUND
  • Who funds ALS UNITED ROCKY MOUNTAIN

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Certe Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph