Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Carter Family Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$292kHealth$83kPublic Safety & Disaster$37kReligion$30kHuman Services$26kRecreation & Sports$23kFood & Nutrition$7kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k29 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY$10,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES INC$5,000
SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY$5,000
SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY$5,000
BRONCO BENCH FOUNDATION$2,500
BELLARMINE COLLEGE PREPARATORY$2,500
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY$2,500
CROHNS & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC$2,500
CRISTO REY SAN JOSE HIGH SCHOOL$2,000
SACRED HEART NATIVITY SCHOOL$2,000
SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE$2,000
MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC$2,000
ARCHBISHOP MITTY HIGH SCHOOL$2,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$2,000
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC: $1k → 8%PARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC: $1k → 8%PARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC: $1k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $2k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $1k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $1k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $1k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $1k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $1k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $1k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $1k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $1k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SAN JOSE: $3k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $3k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $3k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SAN JOSE: $3k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $500 → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $500 → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $500 → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $500 → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
IA
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of The Carter Family Charitable Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Carter Family Charitable Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$492k · 33 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
5

Total granted

$492k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+20%

Still filing today

52%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PO
    PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $198k · revenue +39%
  • CC
    CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +12%
  • BB
    BRONCO BENCH FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +128%
  • LL
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY-GREATER SAN FRANCISCO
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
4
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
5
Ucsf Health Community Hospitals Fka Saint Francis Memorial Hospital

Ucsf health community hospital's mission statement is caring, healing, teaching, and discovering.

Health
6
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
7
University of California San Francisco Foundation

Organization's mission ====================== the university of california, san francisco(ucsf) is among the world's leading universities dedicated to advancing health worldwide through biomedical research, graduate-level education in the…

Education
8
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
9
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
10
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
11
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
12
John Muir Health

The mission of john muir is to improve the health of the communities we serve with quality and compassion.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Health Trust; the most unlike its peers is Dicksathon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $198,400 · EducationPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGESACRED HEART NATIVITY SCHOOL: $10,000 · EducationCRISTO REY SAN JOSE HIGH SCHOOL: $10,000 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $9,000 · EducationCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $30,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESBRONCO BENCH FOUNDATION: $22,500 · OtherBRONCO BENCH FOUNDATIONBELLARMINE COLLEGE PREPARATORY: $21,900 · OtherBELLARMINE COLLEGE PREPARATORYARCHBISHOP MITTY HIGH SCHOOL: $18,000 · OtherARCHBISHOP MITTY HIGH SCHOOLMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $18,000 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INCTHE ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SAN JOSE: $14,000 · OtherTHE ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SAN JOSEAMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC - GREATER BAY ARE: $12,000 · OtherAMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC - GREATER B…BROPHY COLLEGE PREPARATORY: $9,000 · OtherSAINT MARY OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION: $9,000 · OtherSAN GABRIEL MISSION HIGH SCHOOL: $9,000 · Other+12 more: $27,450 · Other+12 moreCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $23,500 · HealthCROHN'S & …THE HEALTH TRUST: $9,000 · HealthTHE HEALTH…American Heart Association Inc: $6,000 · HealthAmerican H…The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $5,000 · HealthThe Susan …+2 more: $2,000 · HealthCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $12,500 · Human ServicesSACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $10,000 · Human ServicesPARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 · Human ServicesCAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA: $5,000 · InternationalWell Constructed: $1,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 · InternationalENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS-USAINC: $1,000 · InternationalSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $2,000 · Food & NutritionKQED INC: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$227,400Other$190,850Health$45,500Human Services$28,000International$8,000Food & Nutrition$2,000Arts & Culture$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $198,400 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $23,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBRONCO BENCH FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $18,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $12,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSACRED HEART NATIVITY SCHOOL: $10,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $10,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCRISTO REY SAN JOSE HIGH SCHOOL: $10,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HEALTH TRUST: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSERVICES FOR BRAIN INJURY: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $2,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDICKSATHON: $2,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERY MOTHER COUNTS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWell Constructed: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS-USAINC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BRONCO BENCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SACRED HEART NATIVITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds CRISTO REY SAN JOSE HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE HEALTH TRUST ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds PARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds SERVICES FOR BRAIN INJURY ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds DICKSATHON ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERY MOTHER COUNTS ↗
  • Who funds Well Constructed ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA19.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Stephen C & Patricia A Schott Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Charity Bridge Fund · Bright Funds Foundation · Leo M Shortino Family Foundation · The Catholic Community Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · American Gift Fund · Matt & Gretchen Dinapoli Family Foundation · Sosj Knights Hospitaller Priory of the Western USA

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Carter Family Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Carter Family Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Carter Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph