Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Carl Jud Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$252k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$109k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Animals$1.6MHousing & Shelter$40kHuman Services$38kHealth$34kEnvironment$30kCrime & Legal$6k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $119k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $109k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Canine Companions$108,750
Friends of the Palm Springs Animal$40,750
Animal Samaritans SPCA Inc$38,300
Individual grant recipient$20,000
Pasadena Humane Society SPCA$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
PAWSLA$7,500
GEORGES RIVER LAND TRUST$5,000
Reach for Home$5,000
St Johns Health Center Foundation$5,000
Friends of Culebra Animals Inc$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $78k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 48% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Reach for Home: $15k → 9%Reach for Home: $10k → 9%Reach for Home: $5k → 9%Reach for Home: $5k → 9%Reach for Home: $5k → 9%PAWSLA: $8k → 14%PAWSLA: $8k → 14%PAWSLA: $8k → 14%PAWSLA: $8k → 14%PAWSLA: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
CT
CA
CO
TN
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of The Carl Jud Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 88%.

The Carl Jud Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 20 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
3

Total granted

$1.7M
$18k

Still filing today

65%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $633k · revenue +70%
  • GL
    GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $406k · revenue +19%
  • AS
    Animal Samaritans
    6× · 2020–2025 · $184k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • PA
    Pets Are Wonderful Support-Los Ange
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • LS
    Louisiana SPCA
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • FF
    Fast Friends Greyhound Adoption of
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Bay Animal Services
Animals
2
The Adoptable Dog
Animals
3
St Clouds Rescue
Animals
4
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
5
California Animal Rescue and Education Sanctuary Inc

C.A.R.E.S.MISSION STATEMENT*Rescue, foster and find good homes for abandoned and homeless domestic and farm animals.*Spay/neuter abandoned and homeless cats and dogs, as well as help low income families with same.*Conduct TNR+ programs to…

—
6
High Sierra Animal Rescue Inc

High Sierra Animal Rescues mission is to save the lives of homeless dogs in the regions served. Our staff and volunteers are dedicated to making our communities better through successful adoptions advancing their welfare and creating human…

Animals
7
Leave No Paws Behind Inc

Conduct animal rescues, rehabilitation and rehome senior animals abandoned to the shelter's system.

Animals
8
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
9
Community Animal Treatment Center

Community Animal Treatment Center (CATC) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization committed to delivering high-quality, high-volume spay and neuter (HQHVSN) services for community cats and pets, with a focus on supporting low-income…

Animals
10
Runaways Animal Rescue
Animals
11
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
12
Save a Pet Animal Rescue Inc

Save-A-Pet Animal Rescue believes it is their moral responsibility to protect and improve the lives of abused, abandoned and homeless animals and to place them in loving, permanent homes. They provide spay and neuter services and any…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Maxfund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fast Friends Greyhound Adoption in. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $405,800 · AnimalsGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATIONAnimal Samaritans: $183,750 · AnimalsAnimal SamaritansTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $50,000 · AnimalsTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION O…LOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $50,000 · AnimalsLOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUE…+4 more: $45,000 · Animals+4 moreCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $633,050 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INCREACH FOR HOME: $40,000 · Human ServicesREACH FOR HOMEPETS ARE WONDERFUL SUPPORT LOS ANGELES: $37,500 · Human ServicesFriends of the Palm Springs Animal: $120,750 · OtherFriends of the Pa…Individual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant …Individual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant …FAST FRIENDS GREYHOUND ADOPTION IN: $25,000 · OtherFAST FRIENDS GREY…Companion Pet Rescue and Transport: $10,000 · OtherPasadena Humane Society SPCA: $10,000 · Other+5 more: $30,500 · Other+5 moreSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $33,500 · HealthGeorges River Land Trust: $30,000 · Environment
Animals$734,550Human Services$710,550Other$266,250Health$33,500Environment$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $633,050 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $405,800 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetAnimal Samaritans: $183,750 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $50,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetREACH FOR HOME: $40,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetPETS ARE WONDERFUL SUPPORT LOS ANGELES: $37,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $33,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGeorges River Land Trust: $30,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCALIFORNIA PAWS RESCUE: $13,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF CULEBRA ANIMALS INC: $12,000 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetNORTH VALLEY ANIMAL DISASTER GROUP: $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE MAXFUND INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Animal Samaritans ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds REACH FOR HOME ↗
  • Who funds PETS ARE WONDERFUL SUPPORT LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Georges River Land Trust ↗
  • Who funds FAST FRIENDS GREYHOUND ADOPTION IN ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA PAWS RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CULEBRA ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH VALLEY ANIMAL DISASTER GROUP ↗
  • Who funds THE MAXFUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Carl Jud Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Carl Jud Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carl Jud’s filings →

    More from the funding graph