Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The C K Williams Fdn Inv Adv Acct

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$633k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Arts & Culture$660kEnvironment$415kHealth$280kFood & Nutrition$105kPhilanthropy$90kYouth Development$50kReligion$15kEducation$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $430k
$25,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIDGEPORT HOSPITAL$130,000
MOUNTAIN TOP ARBORETUM$125,000
NO KID HUNGRY - SHARE OUT STRENGTH$75,000
GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER$50,000
OLANA PARTNERSHIP$50,000
SMITHSONIAN AMERICAN ART MUSEUM$25,000
FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL ARBORETUM$25,000
NATIVE PLANT TRUST$25,000
HILLWOOD ESTATE MUSEUM & GARDENS$25,000
YOUNG CONCERT ARTISTS$25,000
DECORATIVE ARTS TRUST$25,000
ENVIRONMENT AMERICA$10,000
THE OETTMEIER FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
MOUNT VERNON LADIES ASSOCIATION$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER: $50k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CO
VA
DE
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 13 repeat orgs$465k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$1.2M
$170k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+38%

Still filing today

77%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $295k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyFood & NutritionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MOUNTAIN TOP ARBORETUM INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $185k · revenue +111%
  • HE
    HILLWOOD ESTATE MUSEUM & GARDENS
    5× · 2020–2025 · $125k · revenue +56%
  • FO
    Friends of the National Arboretum
    5× · 2020–2025 · $125k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE C K WILLIAMS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
  • NP
    NATIVE PLANT TRUST
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • TN
    THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -54%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
2
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

4
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
Jenkins Arboretum & Gardens

The mission of the jenkins arboretum & gardens is to preserve natural, tranquil woodlands for community enjoyment, to showcase native plants and a world class collection of rhododendrons and azaleas, and to promote environmental…

Environment
7
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
8
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
9
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
10
National Academy of Design

The mission of the national academy of design is to promote the fine arts in america through exhibition and education.

Education
11
American Academy of Arts & Sciences

Founded in 1780, the american academy of arts and sciences honors excellence and convenes leaders from every field of human endeavor to examine new ideas, address issues of importance to the nation and the world, and work together "to…

Social Science
12
Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery

The huntington library, art museum, and botanical gardens shares its world-renowned collections to support scholarship, foster learning, inspire creativity, and offer transformative experiences for diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Garden Club of America and the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%14%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%8%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%29%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 14% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/20
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,545

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MOUNTAIN TOP ARBORETUM INC — $185,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN TOP ARBORETUM INCMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $150,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDMOUNT VERNON LADIES ASSOCIATION — $85,000 · OtherMOUNT VERNON LADIES ASSOCIATIONNO KID HUNGRY - SHARE OUT STRENGTH — $75,000 · OtherNO KID HUNGRY - SHARE OUT STRENGTHOETTMEIER FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · OtherOETTMEIER FOUNDATION INCTHE C K WILLIAMS FOUNDATION — $40,000 · OtherTHE C K WILLIAMS FOUNDATIONNATIVE PLANT TRUST — $25,000 · OtherTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS — $25,000 · OtherWINTERHUR MUSEUM GARDEN & LIBRARY — $25,000 · Other+6 more — $65,000 · Other+6 moreHILLWOOD ESTATE MUSEUM & GARDENS — $125,000 · Arts & CultureHILLWOOD ESTATE MUSEUM & GARDE…SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $125,000 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTIONTHE DECORATIVE ARTS TRUST — $115,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DECORATIVE ARTS TRUSTYOUNG CONCERT ARTISTS INC — $75,000 · Arts & CultureYOUNG CONCERT ARTISTS INCFriends of the National Arboretum — $125,000 · EnvironmentFriends of th…THE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA — $25,000 · EnvironmentTHE GARDEN CL…NATIVE PLANT TRUST INC — $25,000 · EnvironmentNATIVE PLANT …ENVIRONMENT AMERICA INC — $20,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENT A…+1 more — $5,000 · EnvironmentBRIDGEPORT HOSPITAL — $130,000 · HealthBRIDGEPOR…THE OLANA PARTNERSHIP — $60,000 · Community ImprovementGIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesWashington Winter Show Inc — $25,000 · Philanthropy
Other$725,000Arts & Culture$440,000Environment$200,000Health$130,000Community Improvement$60,000Human Services$50,000Philanthropy$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMOUNTAIN TOP ARBORETUM INC — $185,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetHILLWOOD ESTATE MUSEUM & GARDENS — $125,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFriends of the National Arboretum — $125,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DECORATIVE ARTS TRUST — $115,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetYOUNG CONCERT ARTISTS INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE OLANA PARTNERSHIP — $60,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA — $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWashington Winter Show Inc — $25,000 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetFeeding America — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENT AMERICA INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPROCTOR ACADEMY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MOUNTAIN TOP ARBORETUM INC
  • Who funds BRIDGEPORT HOSPITAL
  • Who funds HILLWOOD ESTATE MUSEUM & GARDENS
  • Who funds Friends of the National Arboretum
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
  • Who funds THE DECORATIVE ARTS TRUST
  • Who funds YOUNG CONCERT ARTISTS INC
  • Who funds THE OLANA PARTNERSHIP
  • Who funds GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA
  • Who funds NATIVE PLANT TRUST INC
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS
  • Who funds Washington Winter Show Inc
  • Who funds Feeding America
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENT AMERICA INC
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds PROCTOR ACADEMY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Joan W Rhame FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Joan W Rhame Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The C K Williams Fdn Inv Adv Acct funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Native Plant Trust Inc3% of income from government
  • Bridgeport Hospital0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The C K Williams Fdn Inv Adv Acct?

Find your warmest path to The C K Williams Fdn Inv Adv Acct through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph