Skip to content

· Private foundation

The C & J Flanigan Family Fndtn Inc Formerly Flanigan Family Fndtn Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$78kRecreation & Sports$50kArts & Culture$47kEducation$31kFood & Nutrition$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kInternational$15kCrime & Legal$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOOD RIVER COMMUNITY YMCA$22,500
ERC$6,000
FAR WISE$5,000
INTERNAL MEDICAL CORPS$5,000
HIGHER GROUND$5,000
FRIENDS OF SAWTOOTH AVALANCHE CENTE$3,500
CCMAS 4H$3,000
UNLEASHED PRODUCTIONS$2,500
WOOD RIVER TRAILS COALITION$2,500
IDAHO COALITION FOR SAFE HEALTHCARE$2,500
MEN'S SECOND CHANCE LIVING$2,500
MACKAY MINI RODEO$2,000
NAMI FAR NORTH IDAHO$1,500
CONNECTHER$1,000
BLAINE COUNTY RECREATION DISTRICT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WARRIOR COMMUNITY CONNECT: $1k → 10%THE SENIOR CONNECTION: $500 → 7%THE SENIOR CONNECTION: $500 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$265k · 19 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
6

Total granted

$265k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+8%

Still filing today

53%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEducationHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HG
    HIGHER GROUND USA INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $28k · revenue +25%
  • FI
    FARWISE INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $15k · revenue +86%
  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $10k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • CC
    CUSTER COUNTY AGENT-UNIV OF ID
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • SV
    SUN VALLEY CULINARY INSTITUTE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +8%
  • TA
    THE ADVOCATES
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boulder Watershed Collective

The Boulder Watershed Collective is a 501c3 non-profit stakeholder-driven organization established to address forested watershed health,resiliency and stewardship. We have three program areas: ClimateAdaptation and Resilience Watershed…

Environment
2
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
3
Reel Earth Films

Reel Earth Films promotes wildlife conservation by creating films that nurture the human connection to nature, spread awareness about life-threatening challenges facing species worldwide, and advance environmental activism and research.

Arts & Culture
4
The International Wildlife Coexistence Network Inc

The iwcn provides expert interdisciplinary assistance, training, collaboration, and shared research to enable communities around the globe to coexist with wildlife.

Animals
5
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
6
Wood River Women's Foundation

Amplify the power of women's collective giving to support the wood river valley's non-profits and create positive change in our community.

Philanthropy
7
Wild Rockies Field Institute Inc

To broaden the nature of a liberal arts education; teach critical thinking about social & environmental issues; foster understanding of & respect for natural & human communities; & cultivate a sense of place that encourages personal,…

Education
8
Women Organizing for Change in Agriculture & Natural Resource Man

To advance women's empowerment and gender equality to tackle climate change, food insecurity and poverty within enabling environments. WOCAN strengthens capacities of organizations and individuals for gender integration and leadership. It…

Food & Nutrition
9
Womens Resource Center in Durango

Womens Resource Center (WRC) in Durango connects women and girls to the resources and programming that will help them reach their full potential in all states of their life.

—
10
Western Resource Advocates

Western Resource Advocates (WRA) is a regional nonprofit advocacy organization fighting climate change and its impacts to sustain the environment, economy, and people of the West. As the region's go-to experts for more than three decades,…

Crime & Legal
11
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
12
Methow Valley Trails Collaborative

Enhancing sustainable trail experiences in the Methow Valley.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blaine County Seniors Council Inc the Senior Connection; the most unlike its peers is Unleashed Productions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WOOD RIVER COMMUNITY YMCA: $76,329 · OtherWOOD RIVER COMMUNITY YMCACCMAS 4H: $29,898 · OtherCCMAS 4HSUN VALLEY MUSEUM OF ARTS: $15,000 · OtherSUN VALLEY MUSEUM OF ARTSIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDS OF THE SAWTOOTH AVALANCHE: $11,000 · OtherHIGH DESERT COLLEGE COLLABORATIVE: $11,000 · Other+17 more: $57,000 · Other+17 moreHIGHER GROUND USA INC: $27,500 · Recreation & SportsHIGHER GROU…WOOD RIVER TRAILS COALITION INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsWOOD RIVER …BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionFARWISE INC: $15,000 · EducationSUN VALLEY CULINARY INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $10,000 · InternationalWomen's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project: $4,000 · HealthNAMI FAR NORTH IDAHO INC: $1,500 · HealthUSA FOR UNFPA INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesWARRIOR COMMUNITY CONNECT INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesBLAINE COUNTY SENIORS COUNCIL INC THE SENIOR CONNECTION: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$215,227Recreation & Sports$32,500Food & Nutrition$20,000Education$20,000International$10,000Health$5,500Human Services$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHIGHER GROUND USA INC: $27,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFARWISE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUN VALLEY CULINARY INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWOOD RIVER TRAILS COALITION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWomen's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE CENTER: $3,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetUSA FOR UNFPA INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNLEASHED PRODUCTIONS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMEN'S SECOND CHANCE LIVING: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMoebius Syndrome Foundation: $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWARRIOR COMMUNITY CONNECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY SENIORS COUNCIL INC THE SENIOR CONNECTION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE IDAHO PANHANDLE AVALANCHE CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HIGHER GROUND USA INC ↗
  • Who funds BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds FARWISE INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY CULINARY INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOOD RIVER TRAILS COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds USA FOR UNFPA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNLEASHED PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds MEN'S SECOND CHANCE LIVING ↗
  • Who funds Moebius Syndrome Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NAMI FAR NORTH IDAHO INC ↗
  • Who funds WARRIOR COMMUNITY CONNECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTHER ↗
  • Who funds BLAINE COUNTY SENIORS COUNCIL INC THE SENIOR CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE IDAHO PANHANDLE AVALANCHE CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Spur Community Foundation IncID17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Spur Community Foundation Inc · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Boswell Family Foundation · The Nalen Foundation · Larsen Fund · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The C & J Flanigan Family Fndtn Inc Formerly Flanigan Family Fndtn Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The C & J Flanigan Family Fndtn Inc Formerly Flanigan Family Fndtn Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The C & J Flanigan Family Fndtn Inc Formerly Flanigan Family Fndtn Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The C & J Flanigan Family Fndtn Inc Formerly Flanigan Family Fndtn Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on C & J Flanigan Family Fndtn Inc Formerly Flanigan Family Fndtn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph