Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The C & J Flanigan Family Fndtn Inc Formerly Flanigan Family Fndtn Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 67% of THE C & J FLANIGAN FAMILY FNDTN INC FORMERLY FLANIGAN FAMILY FNDTN INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOOD RIVER COMMUNITY YMCA$22,500
ERC$6,000
INTERNAL MEDICAL CORPS$5,000
HIGHER GROUND$5,000
FAR WISE$5,000
FRIENDS OF SAWTOOTH AVALANCHE CENTE$3,500
CCMAS 4H$3,000
MEN'S SECOND CHANCE LIVING$2,500
WOOD RIVER TRAILS COALITION$2,500
UNLEASHED PRODUCTIONS$2,500
IDAHO COALITION FOR SAFE HEALTHCARE$2,500
MACKAY MINI RODEO$2,000
NAMI FAR NORTH IDAHO$1,500
BLAINE COUNTY RECREATION DISTRICT$1,000
CONNECTHER$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WARRIOR COMMUNITY CONNECT: $1k → 10%THE SENIOR CONNECTION: $500 → 7%THE SENIOR CONNECTION: $500 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$265k · 19 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
6

Total granted

$265k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+8%

Still filing today

53%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEducationHealthFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HG
    HIGHER GROUND USA INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $28k · revenue +25%
  • FI
    FARWISE INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $15k · revenue +86%
  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $10k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • CC
    CUSTER COUNTY AGENT-UNIV OF ID
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • TA
    THE ADVOCATES
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • SV
    SUN VALLEY CULINARY INSTITUTE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boulder Watershed Collective

The Boulder Watershed Collective is a 501c3 non-profit stakeholder-driven organization established to address forested watershed health,resiliency and stewardship. We have three program areas: ClimateAdaptation and Resilience Watershed…

Environment
2
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
3
Reel Earth Films

Reel Earth Films promotes wildlife conservation by creating films that nurture the human connection to nature, spread awareness about life-threatening challenges facing species worldwide, and advance environmental activism and research.

Arts & Culture
4
The International Wildlife Coexistence Network Inc

The iwcn provides expert interdisciplinary assistance, training, collaboration, and shared research to enable communities around the globe to coexist with wildlife.

Animals
5
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
6
Wood River Women's Foundation

Amplify the power of women's collective giving to support the wood river valley's non-profits and create positive change in our community.

Philanthropy
7
Wild Rockies Field Institute Inc

To broaden the nature of a liberal arts education; teach critical thinking about social & environmental issues; foster understanding of & respect for natural & human communities; & cultivate a sense of place that encourages personal,…

Education
8
Women Organizing for Change in Agriculture & Natural Resource Man

To advance women's empowerment and gender equality to tackle climate change, food insecurity and poverty within enabling environments. WOCAN strengthens capacities of organizations and individuals for gender integration and leadership. It…

Food & Nutrition
9
Womens Resource Center in Durango

Womens Resource Center (WRC) in Durango connects women and girls to the resources and programming that will help them reach their full potential in all states of their life.

10
Western Resource Advocates

Western Resource Advocates (WRA) is a regional nonprofit advocacy organization fighting climate change and its impacts to sustain the environment, economy, and people of the West. As the region's go-to experts for more than three decades,…

Crime & Legal
11
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
12
Methow Valley Trails Collaborative

Enhancing sustainable trail experiences in the Methow Valley.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blaine County Seniors Council Inc the Senior Connection and the most unlike its peers is Unleashed Productions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WOOD RIVER COMMUNITY YMCA — $76,329 · OtherWOOD RIVER COMMUNITY YMCACCMAS 4H — $29,898 · OtherCCMAS 4HIndividual grant recipient — $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSUN VALLEY MUSEUM OF ARTS — $15,000 · OtherSUN VALLEY MUSEUM OF ARTSFRIENDS OF THE SAWTOOTH AVALANCHE — $11,000 · OtherHIGH DESERT COLLEGE COLLABORATIVE — $11,000 · Other+17 more — $57,000 · Other+17 moreHIGHER GROUND USA INC — $27,500 · Recreation & SportsHIGHER GROU…WOOD RIVER TRAILS COALITION INC — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsWOOD RIVER …BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionFARWISE INC — $15,000 · EducationSUN VALLEY CULINARY INSTITUTE INC — $5,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $10,000 · InternationalWomen's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project — $4,000 · HealthNAMI FAR NORTH IDAHO INC — $1,500 · HealthUSA FOR UNFPA INC — $3,500 · Human ServicesBLAINE COUNTY SENIORS COUNCIL INC THE SENIOR CONNECTION — $1,000 · Human ServicesWARRIOR COMMUNITY CONNECT INC — $1,000 · Human Services
Other$215,227Recreation & Sports$32,500Food & Nutrition$20,000Education$20,000International$10,000Health$5,500Human Services$5,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHIGHER GROUND USA INC — $27,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFARWISE INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOOD RIVER TRAILS COALITION INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSUN VALLEY CULINARY INSTITUTE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWomen's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUSA FOR UNFPA INC — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE CENTER — $3,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetUNLEASHED PRODUCTIONS INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMEN'S SECOND CHANCE LIVING — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMoebius Syndrome Foundation — $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY SENIORS COUNCIL INC THE SENIOR CONNECTION — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWARRIOR COMMUNITY CONNECT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE IDAHO PANHANDLE AVALANCHE CENTER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HIGHER GROUND USA INC
  • Who funds BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC
  • Who funds FARWISE INC
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS
  • Who funds WOOD RIVER TRAILS COALITION INC
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY CULINARY INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project
  • Who funds USA FOR UNFPA INC
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE CENTER
  • Who funds UNLEASHED PRODUCTIONS INC
  • Who funds MEN'S SECOND CHANCE LIVING
  • Who funds NAMI FAR NORTH IDAHO INC
  • Who funds Moebius Syndrome Foundation
  • Who funds BLAINE COUNTY SENIORS COUNCIL INC THE SENIOR CONNECTION
  • Who funds CONNECTHER
  • Who funds WARRIOR COMMUNITY CONNECT INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE IDAHO PANHANDLE AVALANCHE CENTER INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Spur Community Foundation IncID17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Spur Community Foundation Inc · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Boswell Family Foundation · The Nalen Foundation · Larsen Fund · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The C & J Flanigan Family Fndtn Inc Formerly Flanigan Family Fndtn Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The C & J Flanigan Family Fndtn Inc Formerly Flanigan Family Fndtn Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The C & J Flanigan Family Fndtn Inc Formerly Flanigan Family Fndtn Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph