Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Buttonwood Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$620k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$1.0MHealth$450kEnvironment$300kFood & Nutrition$150kArts & Culture$35k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $550k
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPLAND COUNTY DAY SCHOOL ENDOWMENT$200,000
MENTAL HEALTH AND RECOVERY SERVICES OF JACKSON HOLE$100,000
LCH HEALTH AND COMMUNITY SERVICES$100,000
STROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER$100,000
CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$50,000
CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK$35,000
BRANDYWINE CONSERVANCY AND ART MUSEUM$35,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 4%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 4%LCH HEALTH AND COMMUNITY SERVICES: $100k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 6 repeat orgs$535k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$1.4M
$100k

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $435k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthScience & TechHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    UPLAND COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
    4× · 2021–2024 · $460k · revenue +13%
  • TT
    THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $350k · revenue +82%
  • CC
    CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL
    2× · 2020–2023 · $150k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chester County Hospital & Health System

The provision of management services to the chester county hospital and its affiliates.

Health
2
CalvertHealth Medical Center Inc

Calverthealth medical center provides quality inpatient and ambulatory health care to the people of southern maryland that is accessible, cost-effective and compassionate. chmc works in partnership with the community to improve the health…

Health
3
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
4
Chester County Community Foundation

The chester county community foundation connects people who care with the causes that matter, so their philanthropy makes a difference now and forever.

Philanthropy
5
Chh Community Health

The mission of CHH Community Health is to improve community wellness, strengthen access to healthcare, and further clinical education by facilitating student and resident teaching and hands-on clinical experiences.

Health
6
Community Health Center of Central Wyoming Inc

To maintain a high quality patient care delivery system that provides access to comprehensive health care services, regardless of ability to pay. it is the desire of chccw to treat all patients with the dignity and respect they deserve…

Health
7
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
8
The Christ Hospital

Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.

Health
9
Charles River Community Health Inc

To partner with individuals and families so they can thrive and lead healthier lives by delivering the comprehensive, integrated, and equitable primary healthcare that matters most to them.

Health
10
Chester River Hospital Center Inc

Chester river hospital center (crhc) is an acute care hospital that serves the residents of kent and queen anne's counties and portions of caroline and cecil counties

Health
11
Cheshire Medical Center

The mission of Cheshire Medical Center is to deliver compassionate and exceptional care to all we serve.

Health
12
Chespenn Health Services Inc

To provide comprehensive primary and preventive care and social services to medically underserved families and individuals regardless of their ability to pay.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chester County Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Mental Health & Recovery Services of Jackson Hole. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UPLAND COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $460,000 · EducationUPLAND COUNTRY DAY SCHOOLTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION — $350,000 · EducationTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATIONUPLAND COUNTY DAY SCHOOL ENDOWMENT — $200,000 · OtherUPLAND COUNTY DAY SCHOOL …MENTAL HEALTH & RECOVERY SERVICES OF JACKSON HOLE — $100,000 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH & RECOVERY …Individual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…BRANDYWINE CONSERVANCY AND ART MUSEUM — $35,000 · OtherBRANDYWINE CONSERVANCY AN…CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL — $150,000 · HealthCHESTER COUNTY…CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $100,000 · HealthCHESTER COUNTY…STROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER — $200,000 · Science & TechSTROUD WATE…CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK — $150,000 · Food & NutritionLCH Health and Community Services — $100,000 · Human Services
Education$810,000Other$435,000Health$250,000Science & Tech$200,000Food & Nutrition$150,000Human Services$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUPLAND COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $460,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION — $350,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSTROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER — $200,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL — $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK — $150,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetLCH Health and Community Services — $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH & RECOVERY SERVICES OF JACKSON HOLE — $100,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chester County Community FoundationPA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chester County Community Foundation · Fjc · Wa Speakman Family Foundation · The Roemer Foundation · Sharp Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Buttonwood Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph