Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Butler Family Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$990k
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Civil Rights$1.8MCrime & Legal$1.2MHousing & Shelter$1.0MCommunity Improvement$244kHealth$181kHuman Services$179kPublic Benefit$163kPublic Safety & Disaster$129kOther$0
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $925k
$50,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HouseUS$100,000
Individual grant recipient$75,000
Bozeman Tenants Education Fund$50,000
Miami Workers Center$50,000
North Carolina Tenants Union$50,000
SOS Fund$50,000
CHISPA OC Education Fund$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Equity and Transformation$50,000
For the Many$50,000
Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco$50,000
ACT 4 SA$50,000
National Homelessness Law Center$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
CAAAV- Organizing Asian Communities$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $487k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Austin Justice Coalition: $50k → 10%Freedom Reads: $500 → 12%Faith in Indiana: $50k → 16%Meeting Essential Needs With Dignity (MEND): $500 → 16%Youth Collaboratory: $25k → 11%Austin Justice Coalition: $50k → 10%Faith in Indiana: $50k → 16%Housing NOLA: $90k → 23%Austin Justice Coalition: $50k → 10%Equity and Transformation: $50k → 14%African Communities Together: $25k → 17%African Communities Together: $25k → 17%African Communities Together: $20k → 17%Brigid Alliance: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of The Butler Family Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Butler Family Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 49 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

49 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 43 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
81

Total granted

$2.9M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+17%

Still filing today

73%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $805k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Crime & LegalCivil RightsHuman ServicesEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NO
    NASHVILLE ORGANIZED FOR ACTION AND HOPE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $150k · revenue +23%
  • AJ
    Austin Justice Coalition
    3× · 2022–2024 · $150k · revenue +5%
  • NEO Philanthropy Inc
    2× · 2020–2023 · $125k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • HF
    HouseUS Fund
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • WO
    Women on the Rise Fiscal Sponsor Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • H
    HousingNOLAgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $90k · revenue +108%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
3
Detention Watch Network

Detention Watch Network seeks to end the cruel system of immigration detention via programs of grassroots organizing, strategic communications, and collective advocacy.

Human Services
4
The Black Organizing Project Inc

The Black Organizing Project is a Black, member-led community organization working for racial, social, and economic justice through grassroots organizing and community building across the Bay Area.

Human Services
5
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
6
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
7
Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…

Crime & Legal
8
Equal Justice Society

The Equal Justice Society (EJS) is transforming the nations consciousness on racethrough law, social science, and the arts. EJS works to dismantle structural andinstitutional racism to advance robust equal protection under the Fourteenth…

Civil Rights
9
Prison Policy Initiative

The Organization challenges over-criminalizationand mass incarceration through research, advocacyand organizing.

Civil Rights
10
Forward Justice Action Network

Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…

Human Services
11
Inner City Law Center

In 2024, Inner City Law Center, ICLC, served over 3,400 people, helping vulnerable Angelenos to remain in their homes and recover nearly $20.5 million in financial benefits.

Crime & Legal
12
Philadelphia Area Jobs With Justice

Building support for the rights of working people through coalitions of labor and community and through public education.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voices of Community Activists & Leaders (Vocal-Ny) Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wesleyan University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

80 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 80 of the 159 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
80/80
Grantees still filing
45/80
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NASHVILLE ORGANIZED FOR ACTION AND HOPE: $150,000 · Other+108 more: $3,289,560 · Other+108 moreAustin Justice Coalition: $150,000 · Human ServicesAustin Just…Faith in Indiana: $100,000 · Human ServicesFaith in In…HousingNOLA: $90,000 · Human ServicesHousingNOLAAFRICAN COMMUNITIES TOGETHER INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesAFRICAN COM…EQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION: $50,000 · Human ServicesEQUITY AND …OPERATION RESTORATION: $50,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION R…Youth Collaboratory Inc: $25,000 · Human Services+3 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesELLA BAKER CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $90,000 · Civil RightsELLA BAKE…KC TENANTS: $77,000 · Civil RightsKC TENANT…Southern Center for Human Rights: $60,000 · Civil RightsSouthern …Committee Against Anti-Asian Violence Inc: $50,000 · Civil RightsCommittee…Act 4 SA: $50,000 · Civil RightsAct 4 SARIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE: $45,000 · Civil RightsRIGHT TO …POWER COALITION FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE: $40,000 · Civil RightsPOWER COA…REPRIEVE (US): $24,000 · Civil RightsREPRIEVE …+4 more: $9,000 · Civil RightsACTION ST LOUIS: $75,000 · Crime & LegalACTION ST…Community Resource Initiative: $75,000 · Crime & LegalCommunity…Detroit Justice Center: $70,000 · Crime & LegalDetroit J…YOUTH SENTENCING & REENTRY PROJECT INC: $58,500 · Crime & LegalYOUTH SEN…THE CAMPAIGN FOR THE FAIR SENTENCING OF YOUTH: $38,500 · Crime & LegalTHE CAMPA…SHRIVER CENTER ON POVERTY LAW: $35,000 · Crime & LegalSHRIVER C…FORWARD JUSTICE: $25,000 · Crime & LegalFORWARD J…National Housing and Community Development Law Project: $25,000 · Crime & LegalNational …JUSTLEADERSHIPUSA INC: $20,000 · Crime & Legal+4 more: $8,500 · Crime & LegalVOICES OF COMMUNITY ACTIVISTS & LEADERS (VOCAL-NY) INC: $115,000 · HealthA NEW WAY OF LIFE REENTRY PROJECT: $62,500 · Health+2 more: $5,500 · HealthWE ARE DOWN HOME: $115,000 · EducationHousing Rights Committee of San Francisco Inc: $50,000 · Education+6 more: $6,650 · EducationNEO Philanthropy Inc: $125,000 · Public BenefitTHE PARTICIPATORY BUDGETING PROJECT INC: $20,000 · Public BenefitCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities: $15,000 · Public Benefit
Other$3,439,560Human Services$537,000Civil Rights$445,000Crime & Legal$430,500Health$183,000Education$171,650Public Benefit$160,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNASHVILLE ORGANIZED FOR ACTION AND HOPE: $150,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetAustin Justice Coalition: $150,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc: $125,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWE ARE DOWN HOME: $115,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetVOICES OF COMMUNITY ACTIVISTS & LEADERS (VOCAL-NY) INC: $115,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMiami Workers Center Inc: $100,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetFaith in Indiana: $100,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetELLA BAKER CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $90,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetHousingNOLA: $90,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetKC TENANTS: $77,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetACTION ST LOUIS: $75,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT: $75,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCommunity Resource Initiative: $75,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $72,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT SOUTH INC: $71,250 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAFRICAN COMMUNITIES TOGETHER INC: $70,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetORGANIZING NEIGHBORHOOD EQUITY: $70,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetDetroit Justice Center: $70,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPUBLIC ADVOCATES INC: $70,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetA NEW WAY OF LIFE REENTRY PROJECT: $62,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSouthern Center for Human Rights: $60,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE: $60,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH SENTENCING & REENTRY PROJECT INC: $58,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetEQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION: $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetLIFE AFTER RELEASE INC: $50,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetHousing Rights Committee of San Francisco Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTEXAS CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND EQUITY: $50,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetPEOPLES ADVOCACY INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetOPERATION RESTORATION: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAct 4 SA: $50,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetPEOPLE'S ACTION INSTITUTE: $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE: $45,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CAMPAIGN FOR THE FAIR SENTENCING OF YOUTH: $38,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSHRIVER CENTER ON POVERTY LAW: $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFORWARD JUSTICE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNational Housing and Community Development Law Project: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGlobal Impact: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Collaboratory Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetREPRIEVE (US): $24,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetJUSTLEADERSHIPUSA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE PARTICIPATORY BUDGETING PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $19,084 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH STAR FUND INC: $19,084 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL LAW CENTER ON HOMELESSNESS AND POVERTY: $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NASHVILLE ORGANIZED FOR ACTION AND HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Austin Justice Coalition ↗
  • Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
  • Who funds WE ARE DOWN HOME ↗
  • Who funds VOICES OF COMMUNITY ACTIVISTS & LEADERS (VOCAL-NY) INC ↗
  • Who funds Miami Workers Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Faith in Indiana ↗
  • Who funds ELLA BAKER CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds HousingNOLA ↗
  • Who funds KC TENANTS ↗
  • Who funds ACTION ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Community Resource Initiative ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT SOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN COMMUNITIES TOGETHER INC ↗
  • Who funds ORGANIZING NEIGHBORHOOD EQUITY ↗
  • Who funds Detroit Justice Center ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds A NEW WAY OF LIFE REENTRY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Southern Center for Human Rights ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SENTENCING & REENTRY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION ↗
  • Who funds LIFE AFTER RELEASE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC38× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Tides Foundation · New Venture Fund · Foundation to Promote Open Society · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Tides Center · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Common Counsel Foundation · Public Welfare Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Butler Family Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Butler Family Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Freedom Reads Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University: 1% of income from government
  • Bennington College Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Butler Family Fund?

Find your warmest path to The Butler Family Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 159 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Butler Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph