Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bucklen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$41kArts & Culture$19kReligion$14kHuman Services$14kEducation$6kAnimals$5kInternational$2kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$29k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Union Colony Children's Music Acade$4,800
Evangelical Free Church of Eaton$2,760
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Agfinity$2,000
Weld Legacy Foundation$2,000
High Plains Honor Flight$1,375
CRS Gives Back$1,250
The Wild Animal Sanctuary$1,080
Dayspring Christian Academy$1,000
Centennial Rotary Club$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%High Plains Honor Flight: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$98k · 16 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
7

Total granted

$98k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+19%

Still filing today

44%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureEducationAnimalsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    UNION COLONY CHILDRENS MUSIC ACADEMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +76%
  • JH
    JUDI'S HOUSE INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $9k · revenue +59%
  • TW
    THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY
    3× · 2022–2025 · $5k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • WF
    WELD FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +19%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • CR
    Centennial Rotary
    one grant, 2018 · $960
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greeleyweld Economic Development

Our mission focuses on facilitating and attracting investment, creating new job opportunities, stimulating income growth and expanding the local community tax base.

—
2
Columbine Community Foundation

The Grand Foundation is a philanthropic organization serving all of Grand County, Colorado. The Foundation seeks to improve the quality of life in Grand County by proactively addressing current and future needs in the areas of Health &…

Philanthropy
3
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
4
Defend Colorado

The mission of the organization is to conduct research and analysis of conditions affecting the Colorado state economy and promote policies that strengthen the state economy.

—
5
Great Education Colorado

Great education colorado harnesses the power of grassroots activism and diverse, inclusive networks to guarantee that public schools in every colorado community are welcoming and adequately, equitably, and sustainably funded

Education
6
Colorado Skies Academy

CSAs mission is to inspire successful careers in the aerospace industry with an academically rigorous project-based curriculum that prepares students for advanced secondary and post-secondary education.

Education
7
Weld Community Foundation

The weld community foundation promotes philanthropy to build resources, develops partnerships, and provides leadership that will be of lasting benefit to our communities.

Philanthropy
8
The Stead School

Empower students to design and lead their own postsecondary and career pathways with the context of an exciting Science, Technology, Environmental, Agricultural and System Design thinking learning environment.

—
9
Data-Driven Economic Strategies Inc

To enhance economic opportunities with data-driven strategies that inform community and workforce development initiatives.

Science & Tech
10
Colorado Patriots Inc

Educational support for military families that have borne the cost of freedom. Particularly those who have experienced the loss of a family member or have one that has been seriously wounded in the defense of our freedoms,

Human Services
11
Cowboy State Daily

Cowboy state daily's mission is to provide high-quality local and statewide reporting on the issues that impact wyoming, featuring stories that capture wyoming's wonderful "small town with long streets" vibe.

Arts & Culture
12
Colorado Health Institute
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Weld Legacy Foundation; the most unlike its peers is National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $18,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNCMC Foundation: $15,620 · OtherNCMC FoundationIndividual grant recipient: $4,680 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF EATON: $4,480 · OtherTHE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF EATONKLOVE Radio: $4,320 · OtherKLOVE RadioCentennial Rotary Club: $2,000 · OtherAgfinity: $2,000 · Other+10 more: $7,836 · Other+10 moreUNION COLONY CHILDRENS MUSIC ACADEMY: $18,800 · Arts & CultureUNION COLONY CHILDRE…JUDI'S HOUSE INC: $8,800 · PhilanthropyJUDI'S HOUS…CRS GIVES BACK INC: $2,280 · PhilanthropyCRS GIVES B…WELD LEGACY FOUNDATION: $4,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $1,443 · HealthTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $5,400 · AnimalsDayspring Christian Academy: $4,500 · EducationHigh Plains Honor Flight Inc: $1,375 · Human Services
Other$59,036Arts & Culture$18,800Philanthropy$11,080Health$5,443Animals$5,400Education$4,500Human Services$1,375

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNION COLONY CHILDRENS MUSIC ACADEMY: $18,800 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetJUDI'S HOUSE INC: $8,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $5,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDayspring Christian Academy: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWELD LEGACY FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCRS GIVES BACK INC: $2,280 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $1,443 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWELD FOOD BANK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHERO EXPEDITIONS INCORPORATED: $800 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE GREELEY DREAM TEAM INC: $420 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREELEY INDEPENDENCE STAMPEDE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNION COLONY CHILDRENS MUSIC ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds JUDI'S HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds Dayspring Christian Academy ↗
  • Who funds WELD LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CRS GIVES BACK INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds High Plains Honor Flight Inc ↗
  • Who funds WELD FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HERO EXPEDITIONS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds THE GREELEY DREAM TEAM INC ↗
  • Who funds GREELEY INDEPENDENCE STAMPEDE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bucklen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bucklen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bucklen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph