Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Bucklen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$41kArts & Culture$19kReligion$14kHuman Services$14kEducation$6kAnimals$5kInternational$2kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$29k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Union Colony Children's Music Acade$4,800
Evangelical Free Church of Eaton$2,760
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Weld Legacy Foundation$2,000
Agfinity$2,000
High Plains Honor Flight$1,375
CRS Gives Back$1,250
The Wild Animal Sanctuary$1,080
Dayspring Christian Academy$1,000
Centennial Rotary Club$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%High Plains Honor Flight: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$98k · 16 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
7

Total granted

$98k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+19%

Still filing today

44%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureEducationAnimalsPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    UNION COLONY CHILDRENS MUSIC ACADEMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +76%
  • JH
    JUDI'S HOUSE INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $9k · revenue +59%
  • TW
    THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY
    3× · 2022–2025 · $5k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • WF
    WELD FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +19%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • CR
    Centennial Rotary
    one grant, 2018 · $960

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greeleyweld Economic Development

Our mission focuses on facilitating and attracting investment, creating new job opportunities, stimulating income growth and expanding the local community tax base.

2
Columbine Community Foundation

The Grand Foundation is a philanthropic organization serving all of Grand County, Colorado. The Foundation seeks to improve the quality of life in Grand County by proactively addressing current and future needs in the areas of Health &…

Philanthropy
3
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
4
Defend Colorado

The mission of the organization is to conduct research and analysis of conditions affecting the Colorado state economy and promote policies that strengthen the state economy.

5
Great Education Colorado

Great education colorado harnesses the power of grassroots activism and diverse, inclusive networks to guarantee that public schools in every colorado community are welcoming and adequately, equitably, and sustainably funded

Education
6
Colorado Skies Academy

CSAs mission is to inspire successful careers in the aerospace industry with an academically rigorous project-based curriculum that prepares students for advanced secondary and post-secondary education.

Education
7
Weld Community Foundation

The weld community foundation promotes philanthropy to build resources, develops partnerships, and provides leadership that will be of lasting benefit to our communities.

Philanthropy
8
The Stead School

Empower students to design and lead their own postsecondary and career pathways with the context of an exciting Science, Technology, Environmental, Agricultural and System Design thinking learning environment.

9
Data-Driven Economic Strategies Inc

To enhance economic opportunities with data-driven strategies that inform community and workforce development initiatives.

Science & Tech
10
Colorado Patriots Inc

Educational support for military families that have borne the cost of freedom. Particularly those who have experienced the loss of a family member or have one that has been seriously wounded in the defense of our freedoms,

Human Services
11
Cowboy State Daily

Cowboy state daily's mission is to provide high-quality local and statewide reporting on the issues that impact wyoming, featuring stories that capture wyoming's wonderful "small town with long streets" vibe.

Arts & Culture
12
Colorado Health Institute
Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Weld Legacy Foundation and the most unlike its peers is National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $18,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNCMC Foundation — $15,620 · OtherNCMC FoundationIndividual grant recipient — $4,680 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF EATON — $4,480 · OtherTHE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF EATONKLOVE Radio — $4,320 · OtherKLOVE RadioCentennial Rotary Club — $2,000 · OtherAgfinity — $2,000 · Other+10 more — $7,836 · Other+10 moreUNION COLONY CHILDRENS MUSIC ACADEMY — $18,800 · Arts & CultureUNION COLONY CHILDRE…JUDI'S HOUSE INC — $8,800 · PhilanthropyJUDI'S HOUS…CRS GIVES BACK INC — $2,280 · PhilanthropyCRS GIVES B…WELD LEGACY FOUNDATION — $4,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $1,443 · HealthTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $5,400 · AnimalsDayspring Christian Academy — $4,500 · EducationHigh Plains Honor Flight Inc — $1,375 · Human Services
Other$59,036Arts & Culture$18,800Philanthropy$11,080Health$5,443Animals$5,400Education$4,500Human Services$1,375

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNION COLONY CHILDRENS MUSIC ACADEMY — $18,800 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetJUDI'S HOUSE INC — $8,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $5,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDayspring Christian Academy — $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWELD LEGACY FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCRS GIVES BACK INC — $2,280 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $1,443 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWELD FOOD BANK — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHERO EXPEDITIONS INCORPORATED — $800 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE GREELEY DREAM TEAM INC — $420 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREELEY INDEPENDENCE STAMPEDE INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNION COLONY CHILDRENS MUSIC ACADEMY
  • Who funds JUDI'S HOUSE INC
  • Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY
  • Who funds Dayspring Christian Academy
  • Who funds WELD LEGACY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CRS GIVES BACK INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
  • Who funds High Plains Honor Flight Inc
  • Who funds WELD FOOD BANK
  • Who funds HERO EXPEDITIONS INCORPORATED
  • Who funds THE GREELEY DREAM TEAM INC
  • Who funds GREELEY INDEPENDENCE STAMPEDE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Bucklen Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph