Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Brumm-Patel Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$141k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$486kScience & Tech$90kCrime & Legal$28kRecreation & Sports$27kFood & Nutrition$10kArts & Culture$5kHousing & Shelter$5kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $110k
$2,160
Median grant
3
States reached
$782k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREEN MOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL$45,320
THE DALTON SCHOOL$30,000
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$25,000
AMERICANS FOR OXFORD$10,000
SCHOOL YEAR ABROAD$7,500
COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL$5,000
BREAKING GROUND$5,000
FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY$5,000
NEW YORK SKI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$2,160
THE MERCANTILE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK$1,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
CATSKILL RECREATION CENTER$1,000
PACKER COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE$1,000
THE FRESH AIR FUND$500
THE PLAY COMPANY$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Frost Valley YMCA: $500 → 16%Frost Valley YMCA: $500 → 16%Frost Valley YMCA: $500 → 16%FROST VALLEY YMCA: $500 → 16%NIDO DE ESPERANZA: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 18% of The Brumm-Patel Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 51% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 42% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Brumm-Patel Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.5% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$546k · 19 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
9

Total granted

$546k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+162%

Still filing today

79%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DS
    DALTON SCHOOLS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $145k · revenue +16%
  • GM
    GREEN MOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +1%
  • SY
    SCHOOL YEAR ABROAD INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $78k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • ML
    Mercantile Library Association of the City of NY
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • TM
    The Mercantile Library Association of NY
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • ND
    NIDO DE ESPERANZA CHARITABLE SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +162%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
2
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
3
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
4
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
8
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
New York University School of Law Foundation

The foundation, a subsidiary of new york university, fosters legal education and research at new york university's school of law by awarding scholarships, making grants for educational purposes related to law, and supporting programs of…

Education
11
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations and the most unlike its peers is The Catskill Recreation Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr15%9%5–10yr21%5%10–20yr21%23%20–35yr13%36%35–55yr10%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr21%0%10–20yr21%1%20–35yr13%75%35–55yr10%24%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
11%
5,586/52,192

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
17/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DALTON SCHOOLS INC — $145,000 · EducationDALTON SCHOOLS INCGREEN MOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL INC — $100,320 · EducationGREEN MOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL INCPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $90,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard CollegeAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC — $40,000 · EducationAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INCPACKER COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE — $33,000 · EducationPACKER COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE+3 more — $1,100 · EducationHarvard College — $55,065 · OtherHarvard CollegeCOLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL — $48,125 · OtherCOLUMBIA LAW SCHOOLNEW YORK SKI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $22,160 · OtherNEW YORK SKI EDUCATIONAL…Mercantile Library Association of the City of NY — $8,000 · OtherMercantile Library Assoc…The Mercantile Library Association of NY — $5,000 · Other+9 more — $6,194 · OtherSCHOOL YEAR ABROAD INC — $77,500 · InternationalSCHOOL YEAR A…+1 more — $1,500 · InternationalFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $10,200 · Community ImprovementBREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION — $5,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE CATSKILL RECREATION CENTER INC — $3,000 · Recreation & SportsFRESH AIR FUND — $1,500 · Recreation & SportsTHE KELLY S BRUSH FOUNDATION INC — $500 · Recreation & SportsFROST VALLEY YMCA — $2,000 · Human ServicesNIDO DE ESPERANZA CHARITABLE SOCIETY — $1,000 · Human Services
Education$409,420Other$144,544International$79,000Community Improvement$10,200Housing & Shelter$5,000Recreation & Sports$5,000Human Services$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDALTON SCHOOLS INC — $145,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN MOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL INC — $100,320 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $90,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOL YEAR ABROAD INC — $77,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPACKER COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE — $33,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK SKI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $22,160 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $10,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CATSKILL RECREATION CENTER INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFROST VALLEY YMCA — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGRAMERCY PARK BLOCK ASSOC INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNIDO DE ESPERANZA CHARITABLE SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PLAY PRODUCTION COMPANY INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPREP FOR PREP — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPhysicians For Reproductive Health — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KELLY S BRUSH FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN DREAM INC — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMargaretville Health Foundation — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY11.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Brumm-Patel Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph