Skip to content
The Broser Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Broser Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$19kYouth Development$10kHuman Services$10kHealth$9kArts & Culture$7kInternational$4kRecreation & Sports$2kHousing & Shelter$670Other$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$360
Median grant
6
States reached
$138k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,831
CHILD FOCUS$5,500
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT RUTH$1,800
JEWISH HEALTH ORGANIZATION$1,000
NIKKI MITCHELL FOUNDATION$390
KARSH FAMILY SOCIAL SERVICE CTR$360
FRIENDS OF THE IDF$360
PLAY FOR PINK$260
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION$250
Individual grant recipient$250
VERITANS CLUB$200
SPECIAL OLYMPICS FOUNDATION$200
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%KARSH FAMILY SOCIAL SERVICE CTR: $360 → 14%CHILD FOCUS: $6k → 12%PASSAIC COUNTY CASA: $2k → 12%PASSAIC COUNTY CASA: $2k → 12%PASSAIC COUNTY CASA: $430 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NJ
CA
MD
TN
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$40k · 14 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
17

Total granted

$40k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+44%

Still filing today

71%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CHILD FOCUS INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $9k · revenue +77%
  • NM
    Nikki Mitchell Foundation Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $3k · revenue +23%
  • AL
    AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2019–2025 · $1k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • JB
    JEWISH BIG BRO BIG SIS OF LA
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • CF
    Circles for Jewish Living Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $7k · revenue -48%
  • I
    IFP
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
The Keren Rachaim Fund
—
3
Physicians for Palestine
Health
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
5
Jewish Life Foundation
—
6
Bais Yisrael Foundation
—
7
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
8
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
9
The Bnai Jacob Foundation
—
10
Bader Simon Foundation
Arts & Culture
11
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health
12
Yad Yosef Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Veritans Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $18,630 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJEWISH BIG BRO BIG SIS OF LA: $10,000 · OtherJEWISH BIG BRO BIG SIS OF LANikki Mitchell Foundation Inc: $3,280 · OtherNikki Mitchell Foundation Inc+19 more: $8,169 · Other+19 moreCHILD FOCUS INC: $8,930 · Human ServicesCHILD FOCUS INCKARSH FAMILY SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER INC: $360 · Human ServicesCircles for Jewish Living Inc: $7,200 · Arts & CultureCircles for J…SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $360 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT RUTH INC: $1,800 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $720 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $540 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $540 · InternationalFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC: $360 · InternationalAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $1,250 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $756 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $250 · Health+1 more: $50 · HealthVERITANS CLUB INC: $1,900 · Recreation & SportsBREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION: $670 · Housing & Shelter
Other$40,079Human Services$9,290Arts & Culture$7,560International$3,960Health$2,306Recreation & Sports$1,900Housing & Shelter$670

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILD FOCUS INC: $8,930 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCircles for Jewish Living Inc: $7,200 over 1y, 10% of budgetNikki Mitchell Foundation Inc: $3,280 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetVERITANS CLUB INC: $1,900 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $756 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $720 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION: $670 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $545 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $540 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $540 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJH ISRAEL: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…The Pfizer Foundation…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Broser Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Broser Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Veritans Club Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Child Focus Inc: 29% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Broser Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home