Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Britt George Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What you fund
0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Public Safety & Disaster$183kHealth$25kCrime & Legal$24kFood & Nutrition$21kEducation$18kPhilanthropy$15kAnimals$14kArts & Culture$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $44k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$42k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$20,500
LOAVES AND FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN$13,500
OLD ADOBE CHARTER SCHOOL$10,000
LOCAL COLOR$2,500
WILLOW GLEN METHODIST CHURCH$1,350
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
COMPASSIONATE FRIENDS$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 7%HOPES CORNER: $3k → 8%ST HELENA HIGH SCHOOL: $500 → 9%JENNIFER MURPHY: $5k → 9%ROTOPLAST INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 10%NURTURED BY NATURE: $5k → 11%RUBEN OROZCO: $5k → 12%HONALEE CHILDRENS CENTER: $2k → 13%COMING HOME SANCTUARY: $5k → 11%GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE: $5k → 14%JW HOUSE: $10k → 8%NAPA HUMANE: $1k → 9%LEGAL AID OF SONOMA COUNTY: $5k → 9%TERRY FREITAS COMMONS - UC SANTA CRUZ: $1k → 13%COMING HOME SANCTUARY: $5k → 11%LAURELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $5k → 8%EMILY CAREY: $3k → 9%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $5k → 8%CHARLIE'S ACRES: $5k → 9%LOAVES AND FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN: $14k → 8%OLD ADOBE CHARTER SCHOOL: $10k → 9%SJ ROTARY FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $3k → 8%COMPASSIONATE FRIENDS: $200 → 8%RANCHO ROBEN RESCUES: $3k → 8%HOPE STUDIO: $1k → 8%CALIFORNIA WILDFIRE VICTIMS: $155k → 8%MISCELLANEOUS COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $21k → 8%CALIFORNIA WILDFIRE VICTIMS: $20k → 8%MISCELLANEOUS COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $16k → 8%MISCELLANEOUS COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $15k → 8%ROBERT MOYES: $7k → 8%JEAN MARIE LYNN: $6k → 8%RACHAEL CRAWFORD: $5k → 8%TYLER HALSNE MEMORIAL FUND: $5k → 8%CHARLIE ACRES: $5k → 8%HAYNES MEMORIAL FUND: $5k → 8%WILLOW GLEN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $4k → 8%CASITAS DE ESPERANZA: $4k → 8%SEAN PLACE: $2k → 8%WILLOW GLEN METHODIST CHURCH: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$241k · 4 repeat orgs$162k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
31

Total granted

$241k
$133k

Still filing today

0%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHealthFood & NutritionInternationalCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2018–2020 · $175k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2022–2024 · $51k
  • CH
    COMING HOME SANCTUARY
    2× · 2019–2022 · $10k

Funded once

  • SR
    SJ ROTARY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • JH
    JW HOUSE
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -7%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Animal Rescue and Education Sanctuary Inc

C.A.R.E.S.MISSION STATEMENT*Rescue, foster and find good homes for abandoned and homeless domestic and farm animals.*Spay/neuter abandoned and homeless cats and dogs, as well as help low income families with same.*Conduct TNR+ programs to…

2
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
3
Pets Lifeline Inc

Pets Lifeline is dedicated to protecting and improving the lives of cats and dogs in need in Sonoma Valley through sheltering and adoption, humane education, and community programs.

Animals
4
Leave No Paws Behind Inc

Conduct animal rescues, rehabilitation and rehome senior animals abandoned to the shelter's system.

Animals
5
Jameson Animal Rescue Ranch

Jameson humane is an impact-driven nonprofit organization whose program model includes a variety of novel solutions and approaches to create a truly unique animal welfare organization that is unlike any animal rescue or sanctuary. jameson…

Animals
6
Happy Acres Pet Rescue
Animals
7
Northern California Animal Rescue Friends

We work in cooperation with humane organizations shelters and other groups interested in animal rescue. We rescue domestic animals and place them in nurturing foster homes. All animals are evaluated altered and vaccinated prior to…

Animals
8
California Cleft Pup Rescue

To rescue cleft-affected dogs and cats by implementing and maintaining a foster and adoption program.

Animals
9
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
10
Spot

SPOT Saving Pets One at a Time is a leading San Diego County all-volunteer rescue organization whose main focus is to save dogs and cats in shelters who are at risk of euthanization and to help other dogs and cats in need as well. In…

Animals
11
Nine Lives Foundation

We are a community-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization operating a cat-onlyclinic and adoption center. We rescue at-risk cats and kittens, provide them withclinical care and nurturing to address their medical and behavioral needs and…

Animals
12
Animal Rescue of the Rockies

Animal Care and Adoption - ARR's mission is to save the lives of homeless and abandoned dogs and cats. Our goal is reaching a no-kill society in the United States.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humane Society of Napa County & Spca Inc and the most unlike its peers is Charlies Acres. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $175,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $51,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+27 more — $116,571 · Other+27 moreCharlies Acres — $5,000 · AnimalsSILICON VALLEY PET PROJECT — $5,000 · AnimalsNurtured by Nature — $5,000 · AnimalsRancho Roben Rescues Inc — $2,500 · AnimalsHumane Society of Napa County & SPCA INC — $1,000 · AnimalsLOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN — $13,500 · Food & NutritionHopes Corner Inc — $2,500 · Food & NutritionJW HOUSE — $10,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,500 · HealthROTAPLAST INTERNATIONAL INC — $5,000 · InternationalLEGAL AID OF SONOMA COUNTY — $5,000 · Crime & LegalLocal Color — $2,500 · Community ImprovementNEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL — $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$342,571Animals$18,500Food & Nutrition$16,000Health$12,500International$5,000Crime & Legal$5,000Community Improvement$2,500Philanthropy$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN — $13,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJW HOUSE — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCharlies Acres — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROTAPLAST INTERNATIONAL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSILICON VALLEY PET PROJECT — $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLEGAL AID OF SONOMA COUNTY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNurtured by Nature — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLocal Color — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRancho Roben Rescues Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHopes Corner Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of Napa County & SPCA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN
  • Who funds JW HOUSE
  • Who funds Charlies Acres
  • Who funds ROTAPLAST INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds SILICON VALLEY PET PROJECT
  • Who funds LEGAL AID OF SONOMA COUNTY
  • Who funds Nurtured by Nature
  • Who funds Local Color
  • Who funds Rancho Roben Rescues Inc
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds Hopes Corner Inc
  • Who funds NEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds Humane Society of Napa County & SPCA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA16× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Britt George Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Britt George Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Britt George Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph