· Private foundation
The Brettler Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $355k
- $50k–250k27 grants · $1.7M
- $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AFRICAN COMMUNITY HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT | $385,833 |
| TREEHOUSE | $358,333 |
| YOUTHCARE | $343,334 |
| PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP | $150,000 |
| FOOD LIFELINE | $135,000 |
| WELD SEATTLE | $125,000 |
| MERCY HOUSING | $102,500 |
| DOWNTOWN EMERGENCY SERVICES CENTER | $100,000 |
| KING COUNTY SEXUAL ASSAULT RESOURCE CENTER | $65,000 |
| EVERGREEN TREATMENT CENTER | $53,500 |
| VIRGINIA MASON FOUNDATION-BAILEY BOUSHAY HOUSE | $50,000 |
| BETHADAY COMMUNITY LEARNING SPACE | $50,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON - EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM | $50,000 |
| ASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICES (ACRS) | $50,000 |
| RAINIER SCHOLARS | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.
45 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $967k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PHPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES8× · 2017–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +196%
- FLFOOD LIFELINE8× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +89%
- TTREEHOUSE7× · 2017–2024 · $964k · revenue +172%
Funded once
THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +44%- SFSCHOLARSHIP FUND FOR RAINIER SCHOLARSone grant, 2017 · $33k · revenue -12%
- VMVIRGINIA MASON FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.
Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…
Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.
To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
To support equitable access to economic opportunities for immigrants, refugees, low-income, marginalized, and underserved communities in king county and the united states.
Seattle jobs initiative (sji) creates opportunities for people to support themselves and their families through living-wage careers.
United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.
Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…
Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.
Housing connector partners with property owners and managers to lower barriers to housing and increase our region's affordable housing capacity.
The Seattle Architecture Foundation connects people to the architecture, design, and history of Seattle. We believe the more you engage with design, the more you feel connected to your changing city. As a volunteer driven organization, we…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childrens Home Society of Washington and the most unlike its peers is Seattle University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
79 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 79 of the 116 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES ↗
- Who funds FOOD LIFELINE ↗
- Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
- Who funds YOUTHCARE ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Seattle Children's Foundation ↗
- Who funds King County Sexual Assault Resource Center ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN COMMUNITY HOUSING & DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds College Success Foundation ↗
- Who funds Solid Ground Washington ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR GUN RESPONSIBILITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) ↗
- Who funds CHILDHAVEN ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY DISTRICT SERVICE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds WELD SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
- Who funds ASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE ↗
- Who funds BALLARD FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ROOTS YOUNG ADULT SHELTER ↗
- Who funds RECOVERY CAFE ↗
- Who funds RAINIER SCHOLARS ↗
- Who funds CHOOSE 180 ↗
- Who funds THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds RAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY AND ALUMNI ↗
- Who funds Sail Sand Point ↗
- Who funds Youth Eastside Services ↗
- Who funds CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB ↗
- Who funds ONE ROOF FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · United Way of King County · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Gates Foundation · Medina Foundation · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · School's Out Washington · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Brettler Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.