Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bratton Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$292k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$108k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$942kYouth Development$924kPhilanthropy$924kArts & Culture$396kReligion$233kHealth$88kAnimals$67kInternational$53kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $67k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $225k
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$108,250
FORT WORTH DALLAS CHARITIES$66,949
DUKE UNIVERSITY$50,000
NANTUCKET CHARITIES$43,700
NATIONAL CHARITIES$23,443
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Cornerstone Assistance Network: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of The Bratton Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 63% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 55%.

The Bratton Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 15% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 46 repeat orgs$250k to everyone else

46 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 42 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
29

Total granted

$3.5M
$226k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+70%

Still filing today

63%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHealthScience & TechEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $910k · revenue +51%
  • NH
    NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $88k · revenue +214%
  • TB
    TEXAS BALLET THEATER INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $43k · revenue +155%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHRIST CHAPEL BIBLE CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $60k
  • 4
    4AFRICAgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $53k · revenue +91%
  • CA
    CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Academy of Design

The mission of the national academy of design is to promote the fine arts in america through exhibition and education.

Education
2
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
3
Fort Worth Art Association

The fort worth art assocation, a texas non-profit corporation, was established to acquire a collection of works of modern art of the highest quality and to promulgate and maintain a program of art activities and art education in fort…

Arts & Culture
4
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
5
The Austin Area Commission for the Arts Inc

Austin area arts applauds and advances all arts by welcoming diverse, creative individuals to share their unique talents to inspire our community.

Philanthropy
6
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
7
Museum of World Treasures Inc

To own and operate a museum, curating antiques and collectibles, that provides a gateway to the past that educates, entertains, and inspires lifelong learning

Arts & Culture
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
9
Amon Carter Museum of Western Art

The amon carter museum of western art was established through the generosity of amon g. carter sr. (1879-1955) to house his collection of more than 400 paintings and sculptures by fredric remingtion and charles m. russell, to collect,…

Arts & Culture
10
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
11
Tennessee Performing Arts Center (Tpac) Management Corporation

To provide facilities, services, and programs of the highest quality for the greatest benefit of the people, institutions, and communities of the state, and to take a leadership role in fostering the performing arts, arts education,…

Arts & Culture
12
Trustees of the Berkshire Museum

Bringing people together for experiences that spark creativity and innovative thinking by making inspiring educational connections among art, history, and natural science.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Harbor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Museum of the City of New York. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/44
Grantees still filing
33/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $446,182 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFORT WORTH DALLAS CHARITIES: $239,930 · OtherFORT WORTH DALLAS CHARITIESNANTUCKET CHARITIES: $180,798 · OtherNANTUCKET CHARITIESSUPPORTING HOPE INC: $112,500 · OtherSUPPORTING HOPE INCNANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $76,000 · OtherCHRIST CHAPEL BIBLE CHURCH: $60,000 · Other+50 more: $324,345 · Other+50 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY: $910,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY+1 more: $25,550 · EducationEVENT FACILITIES FORT WORTH INC: $888,580 · Youth DevelopmentEVENT FACILITIES FORT WORTH…PERFORMING ARTS FORT WORTH INC: $111,999 · Arts & CulturePERFORMIN…NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $88,043 · Arts & CultureNANTUCKET…TEXAS BALLET THEATER INC: $42,650 · Arts & CultureTEXAS BAL…FORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $19,000 · Arts & CultureFORT WORT…WHITE HERON THEATER COMPANY: $17,505 · Arts & CultureWHITE HER…ARTISTS ASSOCIATION OF NANTUCKET INC: $14,875 · Arts & Culture+8 more: $27,824 · Arts & Culture+8 more4AFRICA: $52,500 · InternationalCORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $32,000 · Animals+1 more: $300 · Animals
Other$1,439,755Education$935,550Youth Development$888,580Arts & Culture$321,896International$52,500Human Services$50,000Animals$32,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $910,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEVENT FACILITIES FORT WORTH INC: $888,580 over 2y, 60% of budgetSUPPORTING HOPE INC: $112,500 over 3y, 15% of budgetPERFORMING ARTS FORT WORTH INC: $111,999 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $88,043 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTEXAS BALLET THEATER INC: $42,650 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $32,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNANTUCKET COMEDY FESTIVAL INC: $25,550 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetFORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $19,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWHITE HERON THEATER COMPANY: $17,505 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetARTISTS ASSOCIATION OF NANTUCKET INC: $14,875 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetALLIANCE TO PROTECT NANTUCKET SOUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTexas Cultural Trust Council: $7,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET FILM FOUNDATION INC: $6,810 over 3y, 0.3% of budget564 PARK AVENUE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetJEWEL CHARITY BALL INCORPORATED: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME INC: $4,014 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $3,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS INC: $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUSA FILM FESTIVAL: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCommunity Foundation for Nantucket Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEAST SIDE HOUSE INC: $1,850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EXPLORERS CLUB: $1,775 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANTIQUES COUNCIL INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUnion Gospel Mission of Tarrant County: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFort Worth Garden Club Inc: $1,125 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUT SOUTHWESTERN MONCRIEF CANCER CENTER MONCRIEF CANCER INSTITUTE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHEATRE WORKSHOP OF NANTUCKET INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS HARBOR INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT HARBOR YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT FUND: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAVING HOPE FOUNDATION: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLD JAIL ART CENTER: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET SHELLFISH ASSOCIATION INC: $150 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDESIGN INSPIRATIONS: $30 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds EVENT FACILITIES FORT WORTH INC ↗
  • Who funds SUPPORTING HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds PERFORMING ARTS FORT WORTH INC ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds 4AFRICA ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS BALLET THEATER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET COMEDY FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WHITE HERON THEATER COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds ARTISTS ASSOCIATION OF NANTUCKET INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE TO PROTECT NANTUCKET SOUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas Cultural Trust Council ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET FILM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds 564 PARK AVENUE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWEL CHARITY BALL INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME INC ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bnsf Railway FoundationTX29.9× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bnsf Railway Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · The Roach Foundation Inc · Amon G Carter Foundation · Leo Potishman Foundation Xxxxx3002 · Garvey Texas Foundation Inc · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Alice L Walton Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Tj Brown & Ca Lupton Foundation · Adeline & George McQueen Foundation Xxxxx1007 · Mary Potishman Lard Trust Walker C Friedman Co Trustee

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bratton Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bratton Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Nantucket Historical Association: 1% of income from government
  • Artists Association of Nantucket Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Bratton Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Bratton Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bratton Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph