Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Borisch Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$55kReligion$33kCivil Rights$17kHousing & Shelter$17kArts & Culture$11kYouth Development$11kHuman Services$8kEnvironment$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$259k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARENTAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION$3,000
RANDY WHITE MINISTRIES$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PATH: $4k → 14%PATH: $4k → 14%JOVENES: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
ID
IL
WI
NY
OH
NJ
CA
VA
NM
TN
SC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$149k · 15 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
8

Total granted

$149k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+55%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthReligionArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2018–2020 · $24k · revenue +451%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    6× · 2017–2023 · $19k · revenue +33%
  • PR
    PARENTAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $11k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • HC
    HYPERTROPIC CARDIOMYOPATHY ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • TM
    THE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue +184%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
2
Covenant House California

Covenant house is dedicated to serving all of god's children with absolute respect and unconditional love to help youth experiencing homelessness and to protect and safeguard all youth in need.

Human Services
3
Mercy House Living Centers

Mercy house's most significant exempt activities focus on ending homelessness and providing comprehensive housing and support services. the organization offers homeless prevention, rapid rehousing, permanent supportive housing, and…

Housing & Shelter
4
Raphael House of San Francisco Inc

The mission of raphael house is to help low-income families and families experiencing homelessness strengthen family bonds by achieving stable housing and financial independence.

Human Services
5
Hearts and Homes for Youth Inc

To help troubled children and youth who are abused, neglected or runaways, become independent, productive adults. to fulfill this mission, hhy provides a broad spectrum of educational, residential, independent living and mental health…

Human Services
6
Journey Home Inc

Journey home's mission is to ensure a home for all. we believe the most powerful way to do this is collectively - by working together with service providers, elected officials, businesses, and local communities to end homelessness in the…

Human Services
7
Covenant House New Orleans

Covenant house new orleans (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization affiliated with 34 similar organizations across five countries, all of which are affiliates of covenant house international (parent affiliate) and share a…

Human Services
8
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

—
9
Under 21

Since 1972, under 21, d.b.a. covenant house new york (chny) has been working with one of new york city's most vulnerable populations - youth experiencing homelessness, age 16-24, and their dependent children. chny provides young people…

Human Services
10
New Road Missions

We are compelled by god's word to provide security, education and the hope of jesus to children in south africa so they can thrive personally and impact their future families, communities and the kingdom of god.

Religion
11
Colette's Children's Home Inc

Colettes childrens home provides housing and supportive services to homeless women and children with nowhere to turn. we work to remove the barriers that cause displacement and provide the means for transition from homelessness to stable…

Housing & Shelter
12
Primo Center for Women & Children

For more than 45 years, primo center has empowered families experiencing homelessness to become productive, responsible, and independent members of their community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Union Rescue Mission; the most unlike its peers is Jovenes Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RANDY WHITE MINISTRIES: $12,500 · OtherRANDY WHITE MINISTRIESHOME SCHOOL LEGAL DEFENSE ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · OtherHOME SCHOOL LEGAL DEFENSE ASSOCIATIONHSLDA: $9,000 · OtherHSLDACHAMPLAIN VALLEY BIRTHRIGHT INC: $8,000 · OtherCHAMPLAIN VALLEY BIRTHRIGHT INCGOSPEL FELLOWSHIP ASSOCIATION: $8,000 · OtherGOSPEL FELLOWSHIP ASSOCIATIONHYPERTROPIC CARDIOMYOPATHY ASSOCIATION: $8,000 · OtherHYPERTROPIC CARDIOMYOPATHY ASSOCIATIONTHE WILDS OF NEW ENGLAND: $6,000 · OtherTHE WILDS OF NEW ENGLANDBAPTIST MID MISSIONS FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · OtherTHE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherWEINGART: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherHYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY ASSOCIATION: $24,000 · HealthHYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY…American Heart Association Inc: $18,668 · HealthAmerican Heart Association …PATH: $8,000 · Human ServicesPATHUNION RESCUE MISSION: $3,000 · Human ServicesUNION RESC…JOVENES INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesJOVENES IN…COVENANT HOUSE: $3,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT H…PARENTAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION: $11,000 · Civil RightsUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $10,668 · Arts & CultureBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $10,664 · Youth DevelopmentNO GREATER JOY MINISTRIES INC: $4,000 · ReligionKOINONIA HOUSE INC: $4,000 · Religion
Other$78,500Health$42,668Human Services$17,000Civil Rights$11,000Arts & Culture$10,668Youth Development$10,664Religion$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY ASSOCIATION: $24,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $18,668 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPARENTAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $10,668 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $10,664 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPATH: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNO GREATER JOY MINISTRIES INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKOINONIA HOUSE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOVENES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds PARENTAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOME SCHOOL LEGAL DEFENSE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PATH ↗
  • Who funds THE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NO GREATER JOY MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds KOINONIA HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds JOVENES INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN12.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Borisch Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Borisch Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Borisch Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Borisch Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Borisch’s filings →

    More from the funding graph