Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Bonne Bell Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$66k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Religion$103kHealth$49kHuman Services$44kEducation$29kAnimals$16kFood & Nutrition$13kArts & Culture$12kRecreation & Sports$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k30 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST CHRISTOPHER PARISH$10,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CLEVELAND$5,000
GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK$5,000
CLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$2,500
WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER$2,500
ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$2,000
NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICE$2,000
MUSTANGS 4 MILITARY$2,000
WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER$2,000
AKRON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$2,000
UKRAINE AID$2,000
KEREN OR$2,000
CONNECTING FOR KIDS$2,000
ETERNAL WORLD TELEVISON NETWORK$2,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICE: $2k → 12%WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $3k → 17%WESTSIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $3k → 17%WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $3k → 17%WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $3k → 17%WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $3k → 17%WESTSIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $3k → 17%WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $2k → 17%WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $1k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $2k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $2k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $2k → 17%SISTERS HAVEN: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
MI
NY
MA
NV
OH
DC
AL
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$225k · 34 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
33

Total granted

$225k
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+39%

Still filing today

44%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationReligionHealthAnimalsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER
    4× · 2022–2025 · $18k · revenue +7%
  • CZ
    CLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $9k · revenue +4%
  • RR
    ROCKY RIVER EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $7k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • SC
    St. Christopher Church (Pledge payment #2)
    one grant, 2021 · $17k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +28%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARATIES OF CLEVELAND
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
2
Literary Cleveland

Literary Cleveland assists writers and readers at all stages of development, promotes new and existing literature of the highest quality, and advances Northeast Ohio as a vital center of diverse voices and visions.

Education
3
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

4
Greater Cleveland Volunteers

Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…

Philanthropy
5
Cleveland Rape Crisis Center

The cleveland rape crisis center is a non-profit organization which supports survivors of sexual violence, promotes healing and prevention, and advocates for social change.

Health
6
United Way of Central Ohio Inc

United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…

Philanthropy
7
Lutheran Social Services of Central Ohio Delaware Housing Inc

See schedule oto create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home…

8
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
9
Central Ohio Youth for Christ Inc

Coyfc reaches young people everywhere, working with the local church and other like minded partners to raise up lifelong followers of jesus who lead by their godliness in lifestyle, devotion to the word of god and prayer, passion for…

Youth Development
10
Central Ohio Workers Center Inc

The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.

Civil Rights
11
Cleveland Christian Home Inc

The Cleveland Christian Home, Inc. exists to be a haven of hope for children, youth, and families struggling with mental illness, abuse, and neglect in Northeast Ohio.

Religion
12
Hope for Cleveland's Children

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Pedal Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCleveland Community Develop…Family Support & Child Welf…School District FoundationsPerforming Arts Organizatio…Community Healthcare Provid…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%9%<5yr13%9%5–10yr18%9%10–20yr16%9%20–35yr16%21%35–55yr17%44%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%5%<5yr13%2%5–10yr18%3%10–20yr16%3%20–35yr16%33%35–55yr17%55%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/34
the rest of the field
14%
2,179/16,093

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
20/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST CHRISTOPHER PARISH — $41,666 · OtherST CHRISTOPHER PARISHSt. Christopher Church (Pledge payment #2) — $16,667 · OtherSt. Christopher Church (Pledge payment #2)CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CLEVELAND — $15,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CLEVELANDST IGNATIUS HIGH SCHOOL OF CLEVELAND — $9,000 · Other+54 more — $149,750 · Other+54 moreWEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER — $18,000 · Human ServicesWEST SIDE C…HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF …CATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION — $5,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CH…NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES — $2,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST Y…Sisters Haven — $2,000 · Human ServicesSisters Hav…GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $13,000 · Food & NutritionCLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $9,000 · AnimalsFOCUS RESCUE & REHABILITATION CO — $1,000 · AnimalsAmerican Heart Association Inc — $6,000 · HealthAKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $2,000 · HealthI AM ALS — $2,000 · HealthCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $6,000 · EducationKEREN OR INC — $2,000 · EducationHOUSE OF CHAMPIONS — $1,000 · EducationETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC — $6,000 · ReligionFRIENDS OF ST COLMANS FOUNDATION — $2,000 · ReligionCOMMON GROUND CHURCH — $1,000 · Religion
Other$232,083Human Services$33,000Food & Nutrition$13,000Animals$10,000Health$10,000Education$9,000Religion$9,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER — $18,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY RIVER EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC — $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC — $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH CHALLENGE — $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBECK CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMUSTANGS 4 MILITARY INC — $5,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ST COLMANS FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetI AM ALS — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTING FOR KIDS OF WESTLAKE OH — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetReUse Works Ragfinery — $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOUR LADY OF THE WAYSIDE INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSisters Haven — $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFAITH ALIVE USA INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLAKE ERIE NATURE AND SCIENCE CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMON GROUND CHURCH — $1,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHOUSE OF CHAMPIONS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPEDAL PROJECT — $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFOCUS RESCUE & REHABILITATION CO — $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds CLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds ROCKY RIVER EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC
  • Who funds ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC
  • Who funds YOUTH CHALLENGE
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION
  • Who funds BECK CENTER FOR THE ARTS
  • Who funds MUSTANGS 4 MILITARY INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ST COLMANS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES
  • Who funds KEREN OR INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community West FoundationOH19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community West Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · The Arthur B McBride Sr Family Foundation · The Sk Wellman Foundation · The Reinberger Foundation · The Nord Family Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Bonne Bell Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph