Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bonne Bell Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$66k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$103kHealth$49kHuman Services$44kEducation$29kAnimals$16kFood & Nutrition$13kArts & Culture$12kRecreation & Sports$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k30 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST CHRISTOPHER PARISH$10,000
GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK$5,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CLEVELAND$5,000
CLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$2,500
WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER$2,500
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$2,000
ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$2,000
MUSTANGS 4 MILITARY$2,000
UKRAINE AID$2,000
MONASTERY OF THE POOR CLARES$2,000
WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER$2,000
LAKE ERIE NATURE CENTER$2,000
CONNECTING FOR KIDS$2,000
KEREN OR$2,000
AKRON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICE: $2k → 12%WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $3k → 17%WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $3k → 17%WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $3k → 17%WESTSIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $3k → 17%WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $3k → 17%WESTSIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $3k → 17%WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $2k → 17%WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $1k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $2k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $2k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $2k → 17%SISTERS HAVEN: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MI
NY
MA
NV
OH
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$229k · 34 repeat orgs$87k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
30

Total granted

$229k
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+39%

Still filing today

44%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationReligionHealthAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER
    4× · 2022–2025 · $18k · revenue +7%
  • CZ
    CLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $9k · revenue +4%
  • RR
    ROCKY RIVER EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $7k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • SC
    St. Christopher Church (Pledge payment #2)
    one grant, 2021 · $17k
  • WS
    West Side Catholic Center - Moriah House
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARATIES OF CLEVELAND
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
2
Literary Cleveland

Literary Cleveland assists writers and readers at all stages of development, promotes new and existing literature of the highest quality, and advances Northeast Ohio as a vital center of diverse voices and visions.

Education
3
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
4
Greater Cleveland Volunteers

Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…

Philanthropy
5
Cleveland Rape Crisis Center

The cleveland rape crisis center is a non-profit organization which supports survivors of sexual violence, promotes healing and prevention, and advocates for social change.

Health
6
United Way of Central Ohio Inc

United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…

Philanthropy
7
Lutheran Social Services of Central Ohio Delaware Housing Inc

See schedule oto create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home…

—
8
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
9
Central Ohio Youth for Christ Inc

Coyfc reaches young people everywhere, working with the local church and other like minded partners to raise up lifelong followers of jesus who lead by their godliness in lifestyle, devotion to the word of god and prayer, passion for…

Youth Development
10
Central Ohio Workers Center Inc

The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.

Civil Rights
11
Cleveland Christian Home Inc

The Cleveland Christian Home, Inc. exists to be a haven of hope for children, youth, and families struggling with mental illness, abuse, and neglect in Northeast Ohio.

Religion
12
Hope for Cleveland's Children
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Pedal Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
20/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST CHRISTOPHER PARISH: $41,666 · OtherST CHRISTOPHER PARISHSt. Christopher Church (Pledge payment #2): $16,667 · OtherSt. Christopher Church (Pledge payment #2)CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CLEVELAND: $15,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CLEVELANDST IGNATIUS HIGH SCHOOL OF CLEVELAND: $9,000 · OtherMONASTERY OF THE POOR CLARES: $8,000 · Other+50 more: $141,750 · Other+50 moreWEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $18,000 · Human ServicesWEST SIDE C…HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF …CATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CH…Sisters Haven: $2,000 · Human ServicesSisters Hav…NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES: $2,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST Y…GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $13,000 · Food & NutritionCLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $9,000 · AnimalsFOCUS RESCUE & REHABILITATION CO: $1,000 · AnimalsAmerican Heart Association Inc: $6,000 · HealthAKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 · HealthI AM ALS: $2,000 · HealthCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · EducationKEREN OR INC: $2,000 · EducationHOUSE OF CHAMPIONS: $1,000 · EducationETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $6,000 · ReligionFRIENDS OF ST COLMANS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · ReligionCOMMON GROUND CHURCH: $1,000 · Religion
Other$232,083Human Services$33,000Food & Nutrition$13,000Animals$10,000Health$10,000Education$9,000Religion$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $18,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY RIVER EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH CHALLENGE: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBECK CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSTANGS 4 MILITARY INC: $5,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetOUR LADY OF THE WAYSIDE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSisters Haven: $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCONNECTING FOR KIDS OF WESTLAKE OH: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetReUse Works Ragfinery: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFAITH ALIVE USA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF ST COLMANS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetI AM ALS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF CHAMPIONS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMON GROUND CHURCH: $1,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLAKE ERIE NATURE AND SCIENCE CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOCUS RESCUE & REHABILITATION CO: $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPEDAL PROJECT: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY RIVER EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH CHALLENGE ↗
  • Who funds ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC ↗
  • Who funds BECK CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MUSTANGS 4 MILITARY INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR LADY OF THE WAYSIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds Sisters Haven ↗
  • Who funds KEREN OR INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community West FoundationOH19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community West Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · The Arthur B McBride Sr Family Foundation · The Sk Wellman Foundation · The Reinberger Foundation · The Nord Family Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bonne Bell Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bonne Bell Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bonne Bell Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph