How much did THE BOND FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 79% of THE BOND FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

bandcancermusuemscholarshipsyouthartscholarship

2020

musuemscholarshipsartyouthhomeless shelterscholarshipaccounting dept

2021

theatremusuemyouthscholarshipsartorphanageaccounting dept

2022

musuemartscholarshipsyouthhomeless shelteraccounting deptorphanage

2023

christianrescuefndscholarshipfla

2024

symphonyscholarshipsscholarshipfndyouthhomeless shelteraccounting dept

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k44 grants · $156k
$10k–50k14 grants · $224k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$9.0M

Total assets

Largest grants

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY WEST ORANGE$35,345
OAKLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$25,000
OAKLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$20,000
ADULT LITERACY LEAGUE$17,500
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$15,000
WEST ORANGE DREAM CENTER$15,000
CHRISTIAN SERVICE CENTER$15,000
QUEST INC$12,750
WUCF$12,500
WMFE COMMUNITY COMMUNICAT$12,500
OAKLAND NATURE PRESERVE$12,500
LANES TEENAGE GIRLS INC$10,500
FICPA SCHOLARSHIP FUND$10,000
CENTRAL FLORIDA YMCA$10,000
ORLANDO SCIENCE CENTER$8,582

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $225k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.5M · 72 repeat orgs$194k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

72 repeat relationships — 49 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.5M

$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%

+26%

Still filing today

22%

15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationEnvironmentFood & NutritionReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

WO
WEST ORANGE DREAM CENTER
3× · 2022–2024 · $60k · revenue +37%
DS
DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION
7× · 2018–2024 · $35k · revenue +76%
OS
ORLANDO SCIENCE CENTER
7× · 2018–2024 · $26k · revenue +35%

Funded once

BG
BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL FLORID
one grant, 2018 · $50k
OC
ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM
one grant, 2019 · $35k
GT
GARDEN THEATRE WINTER GARDEN
one grant, 2021 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Orlandoorange County Convention

To brand, market and sell the area globally as a premier leisure, convention and business destination for the continual economic benefit of the community.

—

Florida Coalition On Donation Inc

The florida coalition on donation, inc., is dedicated to motivating floridians to designate themselves as organ, eye and tissue donors, so lives are saved and enhanced through donation and transplantation.

Health

Orlando Sings Inc

The Orlando Sings mission is to elevate the choral art form and enrich the cultural fabric of Florida through extraordinary shared experiences for audiences and singers.

Human Services

Orlando Center for Justice

Orlando Center for Justice, Inc.s mission is to bridge the access to justice gap in Florida for newcomers by helping these underserved communities navigate the legal system through education and innovation.

Crime & Legal

Bioflorida Inc

Bioflorida is the voice of florida's life sciences industry, representing 8,600 establishments and research organizations in the biopharmaceutical, medical technology, and digital health sectors that collectively employ 107,000 floridians.

—

Keep Florida Beautiful Inc

Keep florida beautiful inspires, educates and empowers people in florida to take action every day to improve and beautify their community environments.

Environment

International Fringe Festival of

The mission of the orlando fringe is to provide an accessible, affordable outlet that draws diverse elements of the community together and inspires creative experiences through the arts.

Arts & Culture

Florida Association of the Aia

Aia florida is the voice of the architecture profession.

Arts & Culture

Downtown Arts District Inc

To lead, stimulate, and guide the development of a vibrant, innovative arts and cultural district that enhances economic development in downtown orlando.

Arts & Culture

Orlando Sports Foundation

The mission of the orlando sports foundation, inc. is to promote and provide well organized and efficient athletic and social events in the central florida community.

Philanthropy

Central Florida Community Arts Inc

To create a cultural platform where every person can join an artistic family and connect, serve and perform to advance the arts in central florida.

—

Florida Tourism Industry Marketing

To promote visitation to florida by strengthening florida's share of the global travel market with the goal of maximizing the economic impact of travel and tourism to florida.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Orlando Science Centerinc and the most unlike its peers is Messiah Choral Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/19

Grantees still filing

14/19

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,143,030Human Services$225,000Environment$132,500Arts & Culture$83,776Education$79,500Philanthropy$22,500Food & Nutrition$21,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lee FoundationFL18.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lee Foundation · Magruder Chesley G Fdn Im · The Dr P Phillips Foundation · Universal Orlando Foundation Inc · United Arts of Central Florida Inc · Orlando Health Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Roper Family Foundation Inc · The Elinor and Tw Miller Jr · James T and Diana P Barnes · Central Florida Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE BOND FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

4get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: OAKLAND NATURE PRESERVE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~45 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 593464532 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on OAKLAND NATURE PRESERVE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 45 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 16% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Bond Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Bond Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE BOND FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Bond Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

THE BOND FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Bond Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph