Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bob and Sally Clayburgh Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$118kReligion$87kEducation$76kHuman Services$67kHousing & Shelter$64kPublic Benefit$15kRecreation & Sports$10kPhilanthropy$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $44k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST NICHOLAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$13,500
NORTHLANDS RESCUE MISSION$10,000
EMPIRE ARTS CENTER$10,000
GRAND FORKS CHILDREN'S MUSEUM$10,000
ST OLAF COLLEGE$7,500
COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER INC$7,500
ST PAUL'S EPISOCPAL CHURCH$3,500
ST JOHN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WALKER AREA COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 → 14%COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER INC: $10k → 13%COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER INC: $10k → 13%COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER INC: $8k → 13%COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER INC: $8k → 13%COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER INC: $8k → 13%COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER INC: $6k → 13%COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER INC: $5k → 13%COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER INC: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
ND
MN
OR
CA
VA
DC
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$392k · 10 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
12

Total granted

$392k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+57%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentEducationInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EA
    EMPIRE ARTS CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $95k · revenue +32%
  • NR
    NORTHLANDS RESCUE MISSION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $64k · revenue +21%
  • CV
    COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER
    8× · 2018–2025 · $56k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • GF
    GRAND FORKS PARKS AND RECREATION
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • UA
    UND ALUMNI FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • SO
    SAINT OLAF COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Refugee Care Collective Northwest

Provide care to refugee families.

Human Services
2
North Dakota News Cooperative
Arts & Culture
3
Grand Forks Region Economic Development Corporation

Promote economic growth in grand forks, north dakota and the surrounding communities through the attraction of new industries and expansion of current businesses.

—
4
Greater Portland Immigrant Welcome Center

The Greater Portland Immigrant Welcome Center serves as a hub of collaboration that strengthens the immigrant community through language acquisition, economic integration and civic engagement.

Human Services
5
Catholic Charities North Dakota

Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.

—
6
Northwest Consumer Law Center

The northwest consumer law center zealously advocates, litigates, and promotes access to justice for low and moderate income clients, and through its education programs, empowers consumers with the knowledge and resources to protect their…

Crime & Legal
7
National Nordic Museum

The national nordic museum shares nordic culture, values and ideas with people of all ages and backgrounds to create connections, generate dialogue, and inspire new perspectives.

Arts & Culture
8
Red River Childrens Advocacy Center

To facilitate healing and justice for victims of sexual and physical abuse, neglect and exploitation and to engage the community to protect and support children.

Youth Development
9
Northland Foundation

The northland foundation supports northeastern minnesota people and communities working toward a future where everyone feels they belong and can thrive.

Philanthropy
10
Greater Minneapolis Crisis Nursery

The mission of greater minneapolis crisis nursery is to end the abuse and neglect of children and create strong and healthy families.

Human Services
11
Every Child Central Oregon

Mobilizing the community to uplift children and families impacted by foster care in Oregon.

Human Services
12
Omaha Botanical Center Inc

We believe in thoughtful, ecologically-minded practices and the curation of accessible, educational, and inspirational experiences that enhance lives.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grand Forks Children's Museum Inc; the most unlike its peers is Walker Area Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PAUL'S EPISOCPAL CHURCH: $67,200 · OtherST PAUL'S EPISOCPAL CHURCHNORTHLANDS RESCUE MISSION INC: $64,000 · OtherNORTHLANDS RESCUE MISSION INCGRAND FORKS CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $20,000 · OtherGRAND FORKS CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INCROTARY CLUB OF PORSMOUTH: $15,000 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF PORSMOUTHHIGHLANDS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $14,000 · OtherHIGHLANDS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLST NICHOLAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $13,500 · OtherST NICHOLAS EPISCOPAL CHURCHSALVATION ARMY: $10,700 · OtherGRAND FORKS PARKS AND RECREATION: $10,000 · OtherUND ALUMNI FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Other+8 more: $25,000 · Other+8 moreEMPIRE ARTS CENTER: $95,000 · Arts & CultureEMPIRE ARTS CENTERCOMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER: $56,250 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY VIOL…+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesST OLAF COLLEGE: $44,500 · EducationST OLAF COL…Jewish Federation of Greater Portland: $3,250 · PhilanthropyENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $2,500 · EnvironmentGreat Plains Food Bank: $700 · Food & NutritionUS FDN FOR THE CHILDREN OF HAITI: $500 · International
Other$249,400Arts & Culture$95,000Human Services$56,750Education$44,500Philanthropy$3,250Environment$2,500Food & Nutrition$700International$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEMPIRE ARTS CENTER: $95,000 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetNORTHLANDS RESCUE MISSION INC: $64,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER: $56,250 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetST OLAF COLLEGE: $44,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND FORKS CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJewish Federation of Greater Portland: $3,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGreat Plains Food Bank: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUS FDN FOR THE CHILDREN OF HAITI: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWalker Area Community Center: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EMPIRE ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTHLANDS RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ST OLAF COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GRAND FORKS CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Federation of Greater Portland ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP ↗
  • Who funds Great Plains Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds US FDN FOR THE CHILDREN OF HAITI ↗
  • Who funds Walker Area Community Center ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Myra FoundationND13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Myra Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bob and Sally Clayburgh Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bob and Sally Clayburgh Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bob and Sally Clayburgh Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph