Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bob & Cathleen Davis Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$49k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$117kEducation$85kArts & Culture$66kYouth Development$57kHuman Services$23kCrime & Legal$17kFood & Nutrition$10kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$806k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ANIMAL FRIENDS$10,000
CHAPPELL HILL HISTORICAL SOCIETY$10,000
MOMENTUM EDUCATION$5,000
OMPRAKASH$5,000
CHIMP HAVEN$5,000
WASHINGTON ON THE BRAZOS$1,500
UNITY THEATRE$1,000
BRENHAM CHILDRENS CHORUS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%HERE I AM ORPHAN MINISTRIES: $2k → 14%HERE I AM ORPHAN MINISTRIES: $1k → 14%HERE I AM ORPHAN MINISTRIES: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
CT
VA
AR
TN
DC
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$336k · 17 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +100% since the first grant, against +46% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
16

Total granted

$336k
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+100%
+46%

Still filing today

47%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ANIMAL FRIENDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY
    6× · 2017–2025 · $79k · revenue +84%
  • CH
    CHAPPELL HILL HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    6× · 2019–2025 · $42k · revenue +202%
  • Camp For All Foundation
    3× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +327%

Funded once

  • CA
    CHILD ADVOCATES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +12%
  • WH
    WOB HISTORICAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • CH
    CHAPPELL HILL HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Baptist Children's Home Inc

Texas baptist children's home embraces children and families in need in order to empower and equip them for a promising future.

Human Services
2
Children At Heart Ministries Inc

Children at heart ministries is a family of christian ministries that exists to honor god and build a better world by serving children and strengthening families.

Human Services
3
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—
4
Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

Crime & Legal
5
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
6
Camp Aranzazu Inc

Camp Aranzazu cultivates belonging for campers of all ages and abilities by creating accessible, empowering and intentional camp experiences.

Human Services
7
Casa of North Arkansas

The organization and its volunteers serve as advocates for abused and neglected children.

Civil Rights
8
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
9
Casa Child Advocates of Montgomery County Inc

Child Advocates of Montgomery County empowers vulnerable children through volunteer advocacy and strengthens their family and community with education, so they can flourish in a safe, nurturing environment.

Civil Rights
10
Children At Risk

Children At Risk (C@R) is a statewide nonprofit organization whose mission is to serve as a catalyst for change to improve the quality of life for children through strategic research, public policy analysis, education, collaboration, and…

Crime & Legal
11
Advocates for Children Inc Casa of the Sabine Neches Region

Advocacy for abused children

Civil Rights
12
Children's Museum of Illinois

The operation of a children's museum.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Miracle Farm Inc; the most unlike its peers is Here I Am Orphan Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OMPRAKASH: $56,000 · OtherOMPRAKASHIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMOMENTUM EDUCATION: $17,500 · OtherMOMENTUM EDUCATIONMIRACLE FARM INC: $14,500 · OtherMIRACLE FARM INC4 PAWS FARM: $10,000 · OtherWOB HISTORICAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Other+18 more: $48,300 · Other+18 moreANIMAL FRIENDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $78,500 · AnimalsANIMAL FRIENDS OF WASHI…CHIMP HAVEN INC: $5,000 · AnimalsCHIMP HAVEN INCCHAPPELL HILL HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $41,500 · Arts & CultureCHAPPELL HILL …UNITY THEATRE CO: $4,000 · Arts & CultureUNITY THEATRE …NATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME INC: $3,500 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL COWGI…+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureCamp For All Foundation: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentCamp For Al…CHILD ADVOCATES INC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 · Human ServicesHere I Am Orphan Ministries Inc: $4,000 · Human ServicesJUSTIN J WATT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$201,300Animals$83,500Arts & Culture$50,000Youth Development$40,000Crime & Legal$10,000Human Services$9,000Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANIMAL FRIENDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $78,500 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetCHAPPELL HILL HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $41,500 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetCamp For All Foundation: $40,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMIRACLE FARM INC: $14,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHIMP HAVEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUSTIN J WATT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCASA For Kids Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHere I Am Orphan Ministries Inc: $4,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetUNITY THEATRE CO: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ARBOR SCHOOL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBRENHAM CHILDRENS CHORUS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANIMAL FRIENDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CHAPPELL HILL HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Camp For All Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLE FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds CHIMP HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds JUSTIN J WATT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA For Kids Inc ↗
  • Who funds Here I Am Orphan Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITY THEATRE CO ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARBOR SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BRENHAM CHILDRENS CHORUS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

BetsWest FoundationTX15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: BetsWest Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bob & Cathleen Davis Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bob & Cathleen Davis Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bob & Cathleen Davis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph