Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bob and Barbara Williams Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$250
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$250
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Science & Tech$900kPhilanthropy$646kEducation$362kHealth$173kEnvironment$3kHuman Services$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kFood & Nutrition$600Other$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
1
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MANAKIN EPISCOPAL CHURCH$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $300) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
SD
OH
NE
VA
TN
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$819k · 8 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
27

Total granted

$819k
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+30%

Still filing today

63%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyEnvironmentEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $170k · revenue +30%
  • GC
    GOOCHLAND CHRISTMAS MOTHER
    6× · 2017–2022 · $4k · revenue +3%
  • HH
    HEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC
    2× · 2017–2023 · $600 · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • MU
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY PAPER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $718k · revenue +207%
  • VC
    VCU COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $310k
  • PS
    PAPER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FOUNDATION - MIAMI UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $92k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
4
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
5
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
6
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
7
Little River Wetlands Project Inc

To restore and protect wetlands in the historic watershed of the little river, a major tributary of the wabash river, and to provide educational opportunities that encourage good stewardship of wetlands and other natural ecosystems.

Environment
8
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
9
Howard Hughes Medical Institute

The mission of the institute has remained constant since its founding in 1953. as its restated articles of incorporation state the primary purpose and objective of the howard hughes medical institute shall be the promotion of human…

Health
10
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
11
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
12
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shriners Hospitals for Children; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UC FOUNDATION: $642,000 · OtherUC FOUNDATIONVCU COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING FOUNDATION: $310,000 · OtherVCU COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING FOUNDATIONPAPER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FOUNDATION - MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $91,744 · OtherPAPER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FOUNDATION - MIAMI UNIVERSITYMIAMI UNIVERSITY PAPER SCI & ENG FOUNDATION: $88,770 · OtherMIAMI UNIVERSITY PAPER SCI & ENG FOUNDATION+24 more: $59,529 · OtherMIAMI UNIVERSITY PAPER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FOUNDATION: $718,152 · EducationMIAMI UNIVERSITY PAPER SCIENCE AND ENG…THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $169,798 · PhilanthropyTHE UNIVE…+1 more: $4,000 · PhilanthropyJAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION: $2,500 · EnvironmentLEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $500 · EnvironmentATLAS SCIENCE CENTER INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 · HealthHEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC: $600 · Food & NutritionFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $300 · Human Services
Other$1,192,043Education$718,152Philanthropy$173,798Environment$3,000Arts & Culture$1,000Health$1,000Food & Nutrition$600Human Services$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $169,798 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGOOCHLAND CHRISTMAS MOTHER: $4,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetJAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLAS SCIENCE CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBon Secours Richmond Healthcare Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMerrie-Woode Foundation Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIAMI UNIVERSITY PAPER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GOOCHLAND CHRISTMAS MOTHER ↗
  • Who funds JAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ATLAS SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Bon Secours Richmond Healthcare Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds Merrie-Woode Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation IncVA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bob and Barbara Williams Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bob and Barbara Williams Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Bob and Barbara Williams Foundation Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Bob and Barbara Williams Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bob and Barbara Williams’ filings →

More from the funding graph