Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Bob and Barbara Williams Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$250
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$250
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Science & Tech$900kPhilanthropy$646kEducation$362kHealth$173kEnvironment$3kHuman Services$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kFood & Nutrition$600Other$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$250
Median grant
1
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MANAKIN EPISCOPAL CHURCH$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $300) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WI
SD
OH
NE
VA
TN
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$819k · 8 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
27

Total granted

$819k
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+30%

Still filing today

63%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyEnvironmentEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $170k · revenue +30%
  • GC
    GOOCHLAND CHRISTMAS MOTHER
    6× · 2017–2022 · $4k · revenue +3%
  • HH
    HEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC
    2× · 2017–2023 · $600 · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • MU
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY PAPER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $718k · revenue +207%
  • VC
    VCU COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $310k
  • PS
    PAPER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FOUNDATION - MIAMI UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $92k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
4
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
5
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

6
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
7
Little River Wetlands Project Inc

To restore and protect wetlands in the historic watershed of the little river, a major tributary of the wabash river, and to provide educational opportunities that encourage good stewardship of wetlands and other natural ecosystems.

Environment
8
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
9
Howard Hughes Medical Institute

The mission of the institute has remained constant since its founding in 1953. as its restated articles of incorporation state the primary purpose and objective of the howard hughes medical institute shall be the promotion of human…

Health
10
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
11
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
12
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shriners Hospitals for Children and the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UC FOUNDATION — $642,000 · OtherUC FOUNDATIONVCU COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING FOUNDATION — $310,000 · OtherVCU COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING FOUNDATIONPAPER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FOUNDATION - MIAMI UNIVERSITY — $91,744 · OtherPAPER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FOUNDATION - MIAMI UNIVERSITYMIAMI UNIVERSITY PAPER SCI & ENG FOUNDATION — $88,770 · OtherMIAMI UNIVERSITY PAPER SCI & ENG FOUNDATION+24 more — $59,529 · OtherMIAMI UNIVERSITY PAPER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FOUNDATION — $718,152 · EducationMIAMI UNIVERSITY PAPER SCIENCE AND ENG…THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $169,798 · PhilanthropyTHE UNIVE…+1 more — $4,000 · PhilanthropyJAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION — $2,500 · EnvironmentLEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $500 · EnvironmentATLAS SCIENCE CENTER INC — $1,000 · Arts & CultureSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $1,000 · HealthHEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC — $600 · Food & NutritionFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $300 · Human Services
Other$1,192,043Education$718,152Philanthropy$173,798Environment$3,000Arts & Culture$1,000Health$1,000Food & Nutrition$600Human Services$300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $169,798 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGOOCHLAND CHRISTMAS MOTHER — $4,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetJAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLAS SCIENCE CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBon Secours Richmond Healthcare Foundation — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMerrie-Woode Foundation Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIAMI UNIVERSITY PAPER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GOOCHLAND CHRISTMAS MOTHER
  • Who funds JAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds ATLAS SCIENCE CENTER INC
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds HEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds Bon Secours Richmond Healthcare Foundation
  • Who funds LEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home
  • Who funds Merrie-Woode Foundation Inc
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation IncVA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Bob and Barbara Williams Foundation Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Bob and Barbara Williams Foundation Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Bob and Barbara Williams Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph