Skip to content

· Public charity

The Bless Foundation

To financially support existing US based 501(c)(3) organiztions who do work in unreached parts of the world, advancing Christian Gospel by providing services, care, and education.

$632k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$394k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$3.5MInternational$911kCivil Rights$644kEducation$290kHuman Services$274kArts & Culture$244kEnvironment$174kYouth Development$136kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $237k
  • $250k+1 grant · $394k
$156,188
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Global Serve International$393,701
Pioneers$156,188
Ethnos360$81,189
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Archibald Project: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IA
IN
CO
MO
MD
NC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.5M · 11 repeat orgs$747k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$5.5M
$747k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+24%

Still filing today

55%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GLOBAL SERVE INTERNATIONAL INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +125%
  • JV
    JUSTICE VENTURES INTERNATIONAL
    2× · 2021–2022 · $303k · revenue +7%
  • GC
    GLOBAL CHILD ADVOCATES
    2× · 2019–2020 · $210k · revenue +171% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

  • SU
    SIM USA INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2022 · $254k
  • CE
    CUSH EMPOWERMENT GROUP
    one grant, 2022 · $138k · revenue -1%
  • OI
    OMF INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $105k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
2
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
3
Empowering Lives International

Empowering Lives International (ELI) ignites world changers. We equip families and orphans to crush poverty, embrace Christ, and share their transformation with others through their God-honoring income, their deepening relationship with…

Religion
4
Raise Up Global Ministries

Raise Up Global Ministries is committed to educating Christian leaders in communities around the world. The three programs of Raise Up equip the global church by 1 Developing biblically based interactive materials and 2 Training…

—
5
Global Servants Inc

Global Servants empowers educates and evangelizes - primarily in West Africa and Southeast Asia - through girls homes education village investment preaching teaching and sharing Gods love globally.

Religion
6
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
7
Global Seed Planters

Supportive ministry in countries such as china, india, & uganda. preaching and teaching the gospel, aiding farming and water initiatives, and serving the needs of women and girls.

International
8
Global Voice
—
9
Serving Beyond Borders

Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.

Human Services
10
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
11
Total Institute for Development and East Asian Strategies Inc

Facilitate a church and missions movement among pastors, church & mission leaders, theologians, business professionals, and young people in Asia to assist the church in witness of the gospel of Jesus Christ.

International
12
Network Beyond

Network Beyond is a Christian organization serving vulnerable and under-resourced people. We focus on three areas: 1. Leadership development - equipping global leaders with biblically based training. 2. Compassion and justice - support for…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is The Archibald Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PIONEERS: $1,108,232 · OtherPIONEERSETHNOS360 INC: $997,751 · OtherETHNOS360 INCINTERNATIONAL MISSIONS INC: $260,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL MISSIONS INCSIM USA INCORPORATED: $253,600 · OtherSIM USA INCORPORATEDTRANS WORLD RADIO: $199,251 · OtherTRANS WORLD RADIOEmpower One: $120,013 · OtherOMF INTERNATIONAL INC: $105,000 · Other+1 more: $20,000 · OtherGLOBAL SERVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,885,362 · ReligionGLOBAL SERVE INTERNATIONAL INCCUSH EMPOWERMENT GROUP: $138,003 · ReligionCUSH EMPOWERMENT GROUP+1 more: $20,000 · ReligionJUSTICE VENTURES INTERNATIONAL: $303,159 · InternationalJUSTICE VENTURES…GLOBAL CHILD ADVOCATES: $210,039 · InternationalGLOBAL CHILD ADV…Zoe Empowers: $198,000 · InternationalZoe EmpowersENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTE IN CHINA: $100,000 · InternationalENGLISH LANGUAGE…ANANIAS HOUSE: $70,000 · InternationalANANIAS HOUSE+1 more: $20,200 · InternationalSTORYLINE: $127,100 · PhilanthropyYOUNG LIFE: $126,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe Archibald Project Inc: $20,000 · Human Services
Other$3,063,847Religion$2,043,365International$901,398Philanthropy$127,100Youth Development$126,000Human Services$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLOBAL SERVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,885,362 over 4y, 11% of budgetJUSTICE VENTURES INTERNATIONAL: $303,159 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetGLOBAL CHILD ADVOCATES: $210,039 over 2y, 26% of budgetZoe Empowers: $198,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCUSH EMPOWERMENT GROUP: $138,003 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetSTORYLINE: $127,100 over 2y, 18% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $126,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTE IN CHINA: $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRED OAK HOPE: $20,200 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetThe Archibald Project Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetLAUNCH GLOBAL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLOBAL SERVE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds JUSTICE VENTURES INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL CHILD ADVOCATES ↗
  • Who funds Zoe Empowers ↗
  • Who funds CUSH EMPOWERMENT GROUP ↗
  • Who funds STORYLINE ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds ENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTE IN CHINA ↗
  • Who funds ANANIAS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds RED OAK HOPE ↗
  • Who funds The Archibald Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds LAUNCH GLOBAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO16.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bless Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bless Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Bless Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Bless Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2026) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2025, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bless’ filings →

    More from the funding graph