Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Bless Foundation

To financially support existing US based 501(c)(3) organiztions who do work in unreached parts of the world, advancing Christian Gospel by providing services, care, and education.

$632k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$394k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Religion$3.5MInternational$911kCivil Rights$644kEducation$290kHuman Services$274kArts & Culture$244kEnvironment$174kYouth Development$136kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $237k
  • $250k+1 grant · $394k
$156,188
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Global Serve International$393,701
Pioneers$156,188
Ethnos360$81,189
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Archibald Project: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IA
IN
CO
MO
MD
NC
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.5M · 11 repeat orgs$747k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$5.5M
$747k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+24%

Still filing today

55%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GLOBAL SERVE INTERNATIONAL INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +125%
  • JV
    JUSTICE VENTURES INTERNATIONAL
    2× · 2021–2022 · $303k · revenue +7%
  • GC
    GLOBAL CHILD ADVOCATES
    2× · 2019–2020 · $210k · revenue +171% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

  • SU
    SIM USA INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2022 · $254k
  • CE
    CUSH EMPOWERMENT GROUP
    one grant, 2022 · $138k · revenue -1%
  • OI
    OMF INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $105k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
2
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
3
Empowering Lives International

Empowering Lives International (ELI) ignites world changers. We equip families and orphans to crush poverty, embrace Christ, and share their transformation with others through their God-honoring income, their deepening relationship with…

Religion
4
Raise Up Global Ministries

Raise Up Global Ministries is committed to educating Christian leaders in communities around the world. The three programs of Raise Up equip the global church by 1 Developing biblically based interactive materials and 2 Training…

5
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
6
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
7
Global Voice
8
Serving Beyond Borders

Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.

Human Services
9
Total Institute for Development and East Asian Strategies Inc

Facilitate a church and missions movement among pastors, church & mission leaders, theologians, business professionals, and young people in Asia to assist the church in witness of the gospel of Jesus Christ.

International
10
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

11
Network Beyond

Network Beyond is a Christian organization serving vulnerable and under-resourced people. We focus on three areas: 1. Leadership development - equipping global leaders with biblically based training. 2. Compassion and justice - support for…

Crime & Legal
12
New Life International Christian Ministry Inc

Our mission is proclaiming the message of salvation through the saving power of the Holy Spirit to reach the unreached by evangelizing; motivating, mobilizing and organizing the body of Christ.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is The Archibald Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PIONEERS — $1,108,232 · OtherPIONEERSETHNOS360 INC — $997,751 · OtherETHNOS360 INCINTERNATIONAL MISSIONS INC — $260,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL MISSIONS INCSIM USA INCORPORATED — $253,600 · OtherSIM USA INCORPORATEDTRANS WORLD RADIO — $199,251 · OtherTRANS WORLD RADIOEmpower One — $120,013 · OtherOMF INTERNATIONAL INC — $105,000 · Other+1 more — $20,000 · OtherGLOBAL SERVE INTERNATIONAL INC — $1,885,362 · ReligionGLOBAL SERVE INTERNATIONAL INCCUSH EMPOWERMENT GROUP — $138,003 · ReligionCUSH EMPOWERMENT GROUP+1 more — $20,000 · ReligionJUSTICE VENTURES INTERNATIONAL — $303,159 · InternationalJUSTICE VENTURES…GLOBAL CHILD ADVOCATES — $210,039 · InternationalGLOBAL CHILD ADV…Zoe Empowers — $198,000 · InternationalZoe EmpowersENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTE IN CHINA — $100,000 · InternationalENGLISH LANGUAGE…ANANIAS HOUSE — $70,000 · InternationalANANIAS HOUSE+1 more — $20,200 · InternationalSTORYLINE — $127,100 · PhilanthropyYOUNG LIFE — $126,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe Archibald Project Inc — $20,000 · Human Services
Other$3,063,847Religion$2,043,365International$901,398Philanthropy$127,100Youth Development$126,000Human Services$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGLOBAL SERVE INTERNATIONAL INC — $1,885,362 over 4y, 11% of budgetJUSTICE VENTURES INTERNATIONAL — $303,159 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetGLOBAL CHILD ADVOCATES — $210,039 over 2y, 26% of budgetZoe Empowers — $198,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCUSH EMPOWERMENT GROUP — $138,003 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetSTORYLINE — $127,100 over 2y, 18% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $126,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTE IN CHINA — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRED OAK HOPE — $20,200 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetThe Archibald Project Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetLAUNCH GLOBAL — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLOBAL SERVE INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds JUSTICE VENTURES INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds GLOBAL CHILD ADVOCATES
  • Who funds Zoe Empowers
  • Who funds CUSH EMPOWERMENT GROUP
  • Who funds STORYLINE
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds ENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTE IN CHINA
  • Who funds ANANIAS HOUSE
  • Who funds RED OAK HOPE
  • Who funds The Archibald Project Inc
  • Who funds LAUNCH GLOBAL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO16.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Bless Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Bless Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Bless Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph