Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Blake Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$109k
Granted FY2026still arriving
7
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$74kPhilanthropy$59kHuman Services$17kReligion$16kFood & Nutrition$9kArts & Culture$4kYouth Development$1kSocial Science$1kOther$0
02FY2026 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k6 grants · $9k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$750
Median grant
2
States reached
$449k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION$100,000
RESOURCE WEST$5,045
HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL$2,500
TPT$750
MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM$325
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$150
ANNUNCIATION FOUNDATION FOR SURVIVO$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ICA FOOD SHELF: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$280k · 21 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2026, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
31

Total granted

$280k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+11%

Still filing today

33%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationArts & CultureAnimalsEnvironmentCrime & LegalInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
    3× · 2024–2026 · $130k · revenue +12%
  • UI
    UPTURNSHIPS INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $2k · revenue +56%
  • MH
    MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • IC
    INTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -3%
  • SL
    ST LOUIS PRONAOS OF ROSICRUCIAN ORD
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • IF
    ICA FOODSHELF EMPTY BOWLS
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
2
Minnesota Women Lawyers

To advance the success of women attorneys and strive for a just society.

—
3
New Hampshire Historical Society

To educate a diverse public about the significance of New Hampshire's past and its relationship to our lives today. To this end, the Society collects, preserves, and interprets material pertaining to New Hampshire history.

Arts & Culture
4
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
5
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
6
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Community Shares of Minnesota

The mission of community shares of minnesota is to create a fair, just and equitable minnesota. community shares of minnesota accomplishes its mission by: supporting collective action to eliminate root causes of inequality and injustice;…

—
9
Minnesota State University Student Association Inc

Led by minnesota state university students, we are the inclusive voice for all future, current, and former students. we actively work to represent and support minnesota state university students and advocate at a campus, state, and federal…

Education
10
Minnesota Coalition Against Sexual Assault

The Minnesota Coalition Against Sexual Assault is a statewide coalition driving transformative culture change to address sexual violence through advocacy, prevention, racial justice, and systems change. We envision a world free of sexual…

Crime & Legal
11
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
12
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Minnesota Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hopkins Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $130,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATIONResourcewest: $19,873 · EducationResourcewest+2 more: $1,800 · EducationUNNIVERSITY OF MN FOUNDATION: $57,400 · OtherUNNIVERSITY OF MN FOUNDATIONU OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherU OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATIONHOPKINS PUBLIC ISD #270: $12,200 · OtherHOPKINS PUBLIC ISD #270ST LOUIS LODGE AMORC: $12,000 · OtherST LOUIS LODGE AMORC+38 more: $26,176 · Other+38 moreINTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesMINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,500 · Arts & CultureColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $1,000 · Arts & CultureCORNERHOUSE: $815 · Crime & LegalPASADENA HUMANE: $263 · AnimalsAnimal Humane Society: $103 · AnimalsThe Advocates For Human Rights: $200 · International
Education$151,673Other$137,776Human Services$5,000Arts & Culture$2,500Crime & Legal$815Animals$366International$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $130,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetResourcewest: $19,873 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetINTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUPTURNSHIPS INC: $1,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPKINS HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $971 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetCORNERHOUSE: $815 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN STAR COUNCIL: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Advocates For Human Rights: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH COUNTRY FOOD ALLIANCE: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Humane Society: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN WATER FUND: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARLETON COLLEGE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Resourcewest ↗
  • Who funds INTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UPTURNSHIPS INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HOPKINS HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CORNERHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN STAR COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds PASADENA HUMANE ↗
  • Who funds The Advocates For Human Rights ↗
  • Who funds NORTH COUNTRY FOOD ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Animal Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN WATER FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Otto Bremer TrustMN15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Otto Bremer Trust · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Pentair Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Blake Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Blake Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Blake’s filings →

    More from the funding graph