Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Blackmon Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$98kFood & Nutrition$46kEducation$41kHealth$12kRecreation & Sports$10kPhilanthropy$8kHuman Services$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$448k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK$9,292
THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA$5,000
THE MONTGOMERY ACADEMY$3,500
FOLDS OF HONOR - ALABAMA$3,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA$1,000
BROTHER BRYAN MISSION OF BIRMINGHAM$1,000
UNITED ABILITY$1,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS OF ALABAMA & MISSISSIPPI$862
MERCY SHIPS$250
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%BIG OAK RANCH: $1k → 18%BIG OAK RANCH: $500 → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$192k · 14 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
13

Total granted

$192k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+145%

Still filing today

64%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $42k · revenue +50%
  • TM
    THE MONTGOMERY ACADEMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +27%
  • TC
    The Children's Hospital of Alabama
    7× · 2017–2023 · $7k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHRIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • FA
    FEEDING AVERY FAMILIES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue +11%
  • MM
    MONTGOMERY MUSEUM OF FINE ART
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alabama Partnership for Children

To work in partnership with families and organizations to ensure that all alabama children (birth to five) get everything they need to develop to their fullest potential.

Education
2
Alabama Bankers Association Inc

To promote the preservation and continued development of commercial banking in alabama.

—
3
Alabama Chapter of American Academy of Pediatrics

Obtain optimal health & well-being for all children in alabama, and to provide educational and practice support for its membership so the highest quality of medical care can be achieved.

Health
4
Alabama Children's Hospital Foundation

The mission of Alabama Children's Hospital Foundation (The Foundation) is to support the activities and mission of the Hospital (CHA).

Health
5
The Land Trust for Tennessee Inc

To conserve the unique character of tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.

Environment
6
Alabama a&M University Foundation

The Alabama A&M University Foundation was established to receive, hold, invest, manage, use, and administer property of all kinds, whether given absolutely or in trust, for the benefit of Alabama A&M University and its educational,…

—
7
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
10
Palm Beach Day Academy Inc

The foundation of the palm beach day academy's program is the education of our students in an academically challenging and compassion rich environment that guides each child toward personal excellence of mind, body and character.

Education
11
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
12
Uab Educational Foundation

To support the university of alabama at birmingham in its scientific and educational mission, including managing and disbursing funds, acquiring real property, and providing operational flexibility.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Ability Inc; the most unlike its peers is Montgomery Museum of Fine Arts Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRIST CHURCH UNITED METHODIST: $75,000 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH UNITED METHODISTCHRIST CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherCHRIST CHURCHCRIMSON TIDE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherCRIMSON TIDE FOUNDATIONAMERICAN RED CROSS: $5,300 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $5,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Other+15 more: $16,759 · Other+15 moreHEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC: $41,579 · Food & NutritionHEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK INCTHE MONTGOMERY ACADEMY: $27,500 · Food & NutritionTHE MONTGOMERY ACADEMYFEEDING AVERY FAMILIES INC: $4,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING AVERY FAMILIES INCThe Children's Hospital of Alabama: $6,500 · HealthTUM TUM TREE FOUNDATION: $3,000 · HealthBREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF ALA: $1,500 · HealthUNITED ABILITY INC: $1,000 · HealthLAUSANNE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL: $5,000 · EducationLINVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $3,741 · EducationMONTGOMERY MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS ASSOCIATION: $3,650 · Arts & CultureBIG OAK RANCH INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC: $200 · PhilanthropyARNOLD & WINNIE PALMER FOUNDATION INC: $100 · PhilanthropyMercy Ships International: $250 · International
Other$137,059Food & Nutrition$73,079Health$12,000Education$8,741Arts & Culture$3,650Human Services$1,500Philanthropy$300International$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC: $41,579 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MONTGOMERY ACADEMY: $27,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Hospital of Alabama: $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLAUSANNE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AVERY FAMILIES INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLINVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $3,741 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMONTGOMERY MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS ASSOCIATION: $3,650 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTUM TUM TREE FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBIG OAK RANCH INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF ALA: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED ABILITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARNOLD & WINNIE PALMER FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MONTGOMERY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Hospital of Alabama ↗
  • Who funds LAUSANNE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AVERY FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LINVILLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds TUM TUM TREE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF ALA ↗
  • Who funds UNITED ABILITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds ARNOLD & WINNIE PALMER FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alabama Power Foundation IncAL15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Landa Fund · Crum Family Charitable Foundation · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Blackmon Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Blackmon Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Blackmon Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph