Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bill & Claudia Abernathy Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$161k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$96k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$549kHuman Services$12kInternational$11kHealth$3kPhilanthropy$2kCrime & Legal$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $96k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$33k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASBURY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$96,000
FAITH COMES BY HEARING$25,000
VOICE OF THE MARTYRS$25,000
NORTH AMERICAN AZERBAIJANI NETWORK$6,000
GLOBAL HEART MINISTRIES$2,500
STUMO LONE STAR NORTH$2,250
HOPE HARBOR CHILDRENS HOME$2,000
BLESSINGS INTERNATIONAL$1,200
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GLOBAL HEART MINISTRIES: $3k → 5%INSIDE OUT REENTRY SERVICES: $2k → 15%HOPE HARBOR CHILDRENS HOME & FAMILY MINISTRIES: $1k → 10%OPERATION HOPE PRISON MINISTRIES: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
WY
CO
NM
AR
OK
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$546k · 12 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$546k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
0%

Still filing today

42%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    THE NORTH AMERICAN AZERBAIJANI NETWORK
    6× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +29%
  • JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +198%
  • BI
    BLESSINGS INTERNATIONAL
    4× · 2021–2025 · $4k · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • AO
    ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +64%
  • CD
    CHURCH DYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue 0%
  • IO
    INSIDE OUT RE-ENTRY SERVICES
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
2
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
3
Leadership Resources International

International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures

Religion
4
Hope Christian Ministries International

Ministries

Religion
5
Hope International

Spread the teachings and doctrines of the seventh day adventist church

Religion
6
Sozo International Inc

Sozo International partners with at-risk families to create a sustainable future and transformed lives through education, health, and economic initiatives.

—
7
Hope Corps

To train varous individuals to be prepared for mission trips

International
8
Oasis Counseling International

To provide to the general public the following services: 1) Individual Psychological Counseling, 2) Play therapy for children, 3)Marriage Counseling, 4) Psychological Evaluations, 5)Financial Counseling, 6)Career Counseling, 7)psychiatric,…

Religion
9
Orphans Hope International
—
10
Uncharted International Inc

Uncharted international, inc is a christian missions org that seeks to have a life-changing impact in the lives of people in unreached or underserved countries. uncharted does this through medical, educational, and economical development…

International
11
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
12
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blessings International; the most unlike its peers is Scott Carter Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASBURY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $447,951 · OtherASBURY UNITED METHODIST CHURCHVOICE OF THE MARTYRS INC: $26,000 · OtherFAITH COMES BY HEARING: $25,000 · Other+8 more: $28,600 · Other+8 moreTHE NORTH AMERICAN AZERBAIJANI NETWORK: $33,000 · ReligionJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA INC: $4,500 · InternationalBLESSINGS INTERNATIONAL: $4,400 · InternationalALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $2,500 · InternationalGlobal Heart Ministries Inc: $2,500 · Human ServicesHOPE HARBOR INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesINSIDE OUT RE-ENTRY SERVICES: $2,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION HOPE PRISON MINISTRY INC: $1,750 · Human ServicesSCOTT CARTER FOUNDATION: $2,600 · PhilanthropyThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $2,200 · Philanthropy
Other$527,551Religion$33,000International$11,400Human Services$8,250Philanthropy$4,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NORTH AMERICAN AZERBAIJANI NETWORK: $33,000 over 6y, 7.2% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA INC: $4,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBLESSINGS INTERNATIONAL: $4,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSCOTT CARTER FOUNDATION: $2,600 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCH DYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL: $2,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetHOPE HARBOR INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINSIDE OUT RE-ENTRY SERVICES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOPERATION HOPE PRISON MINISTRY INC: $1,750 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NORTH AMERICAN AZERBAIJANI NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds BLESSINGS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds SCOTT CARTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Global Heart Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH DYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HARBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds INSIDE OUT RE-ENTRY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION HOPE PRISON MINISTRY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bill & Claudia Abernathy Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bill & Claudia Abernathy Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bill & Claudia Abernathy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph