· Private foundation
The Bill & Claudia Abernathy Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $96k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ASBURY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $96,000 |
| FAITH COMES BY HEARING | $25,000 |
| VOICE OF THE MARTYRS | $25,000 |
| NORTH AMERICAN AZERBAIJANI NETWORK | $6,000 |
| GLOBAL HEART MINISTRIES | $2,500 |
| STUMO LONE STAR NORTH | $2,250 |
| HOPE HARBOR CHILDRENS HOME | $2,000 |
| BLESSINGS INTERNATIONAL | $1,200 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA | $750 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TNTHE NORTH AMERICAN AZERBAIJANI NETWORK6× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +29%
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA INC6× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +198%- BIBLESSINGS INTERNATIONAL4× · 2021–2025 · $4k · revenue +95%
Funded once
- AOALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +64%
- IOINSIDE OUT RE-ENTRY SERVICESone grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -17%
- CDCHURCH DYNAMICS INTERNATIONALone grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.
Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…
International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures
Ministries
Spread the teachings and doctrines of the seventh day adventist church
Sozo International partners with at-risk families to create a sustainable future and transformed lives through education, health, and economic initiatives.
To train varous individuals to be prepared for mission trips
To provide to the general public the following services: 1) Individual Psychological Counseling, 2) Play therapy for children, 3)Marriage Counseling, 4) Psychological Evaluations, 5)Financial Counseling, 6)Career Counseling, 7)psychiatric,…
Uncharted international, inc is a christian missions org that seeks to have a life-changing impact in the lives of people in unreached or underserved countries. uncharted does this through medical, educational, and economical development…
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blessings International and the most unlike its peers is Scott Carter Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE NORTH AMERICAN AZERBAIJANI NETWORK ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds BLESSINGS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds SCOTT CARTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Global Heart Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds INSIDE OUT RE-ENTRY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds HOPE HARBOR INC ↗
- Who funds CHURCH DYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds OPERATION HOPE PRISON MINISTRY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Bill & Claudia Abernathy Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.