Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Bhutta Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$189k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$81k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

International$509kFood & Nutrition$421kReligion$140kHuman Services$97kHealth$95kPhilanthropy$6kCivil Rights$5kEmployment$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $33k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $142k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Noor Project$81,000
The Citizen Foundation USA$60,750
FIU Foundation$12,000
ANERA$11,000
UHI Community Care Clinic$10,000
Islamic Foundation of South Florida$5,000
REAL TIME MANAGERS LLC$4,700
Feeding Americas Hungry Children$2,956
Individual grant recipient$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $485k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Citizen Foundation USA: $169k → 16%The Citizen Foundation USA: $98k → 16%The Citizen Foundation USA: $69k → 16%The Citizen Foundation USA: $61k → 16%The Citizen Foundation USA: $49k → 16%THE CITIZEN FOUNDATION USA: $40k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
NJ
CA
AZ
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 8 repeat orgs$218k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

$1.1M
$192k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
0%

Still filing today

63%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionReligionPhilanthropyInternationalHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $485k · revenue +43%
  • FT
    FOR THE NEEDY & HUNGRY FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $418k · revenue +67%
  • FA
    FEEDING AMERICA'S HUNGRY CHILDREN
    4× · 2022–2025 · $8k · revenue +340%

Funded once

  • IC
    ISLAMIC CENTER OF WESTON CORP
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -68%
  • CF
    CHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +15%
  • PC
    Pakistan Childrens Heart Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Al Ansaar Foundation for Humanity
Philanthropy
2
Universal Cultural Foundation Inc
Arts & Culture
3
Islamic Ummah Relief Corp

Develop long-term developmental projects aimed at providing a sustainable living for poor communities as well as supporting needy widows and orphans

Human Services
4
Zakah Aid and Charity Assisting Humanity

Zakat, aid and charity assisting humanity (zacah) is a minnesota-based grassroots organization dedicated to the collection and re-distribution of wealth, including zakat (mandatory charitable tax for all muslims) and sadaqah (any…

Religion
5
Imam Abu Hanifa Islamic Center

Religious Organization, to pray and promote the religion, help refugees

Religion
6
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
7
Cambodian Islamic Foundation
Education
8
Ali Hasnain Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
9
International Humanitarian Relief

To provide full educational and learning opportuintes to displaced refugees. ihr-usa operates learning centers that teach children basic math, english and science classes. in addition we help in their everyday lives such as food, shelter…

International
10
Allah Wale Trust Inc

To provide food and shelter to the poor people of pakistan

Food & Nutrition
11
Feeding Hungry Children International

Provide food, shelter, and medical assistance for children around the world.

12
Ameri Help Afghans Foundation Inc
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Citizens Foundation Usa and the most unlike its peers is For the Needy & Hungry Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA — $484,500 · Human ServicesTHE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USAFOR THE NEEDY & HUNGRY FOUNDATION INC — $417,500 · Food & NutritionFOR THE NEEDY & HUNGRY FOUNDATION INC+1 more — $8,060 · Food & NutritionChildLife Foundation of America — $85,000 · OtherChildLife Founda…ISLAMIC FOUNDATION OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $40,000 · OtherISLAMIC FOUNDATI…Pakistan Childrens Heart Foundation — $20,000 · OtherPakistan Childre…FIU Foundation — $12,000 · OtherFIU FoundationSaylani Welfare Trust — $10,209 · OtherSaylani Welfare …+6 more — $21,200 · Other+6 moreISLAMIC CENTER OF WESTON CORP — $100,000 · ReligionISLAMIC C…UNIVERSAL HERITAGE INSTITUTE I — $10,000 · ReligionUNIVERSAL…CHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I — $50,000 · PhilanthropyHIDAYA FOUNDATION — $5,500 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID — $18,000 · International+1 more — $500 · InternationalCAIR FLORIDA INC — $5,000 · Civil Rights
Human Services$484,500Food & Nutrition$425,560Other$188,409Religion$110,000Philanthropy$55,500International$18,500Civil Rights$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA — $484,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetFOR THE NEEDY & HUNGRY FOUNDATION INC — $417,500 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetISLAMIC CENTER OF WESTON CORP — $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I — $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetISLAMIC FOUNDATION OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID — $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA'S HUNGRY CHILDREN — $8,060 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHIDAYA FOUNDATION — $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAIR FLORIDA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA
  • Who funds FOR THE NEEDY & HUNGRY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ISLAMIC CENTER OF WESTON CORP
  • Who funds CHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I
  • Who funds ISLAMIC FOUNDATION OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID
  • Who funds UNIVERSAL HERITAGE INSTITUTE I
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA'S HUNGRY CHILDREN
  • Who funds HIDAYA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CAIR FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds UNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Muslim Community FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Muslim Community Foundation · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Bhutta Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph