Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Better Way Foundation Ltd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$92k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$129kHuman Services$78kHousing & Shelter$29kAnimals$28kArts & Culture$21kPhilanthropy$12kInternational$9kEducation$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $63k
$7,800
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROMISE POINTE$63,070
NORTH CHURCH OF CHRIST$16,583
4 PAWS FOR ABILITY$7,800
FORT WAYNE PHILHARMONIC$3,000
FORT WAYNE ANIMAL CARE$1,000
HUMANE FORT WAYNE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $8k → 9%SHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN: $6k → 5%SHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN: $3k → 5%SHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN: $2k → 5%SHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN: $2k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$208k · 14 repeat orgs$122k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
19

Total granted

$208k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+2%

Still filing today

50%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $13k · revenue +18%
  • AH
    ASSISTING HANDS FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $9k · revenue +69%
  • HF
    HUMANE FORT WAYNE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $8k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $29k
  • GF
    GREENCROFT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $7k
  • AH
    APPLE HOUSE PRESCHOOL COOPERATIVE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Paws of Muskingum County

The paws of muskingum county mission is to achieve a smaller, healthier pet population through affordable spay/neuter program

Animals
2
Promoting Animal Welfare Society for the Wayne County Dog Shelter

Wayne county paws is a charitable organization whose core mission is to provide support to the wayne county dog shelter & adoption center.

Animals
3
Humane Indiana Inc

To lead the community in the humane treatment of animals.

Animals
4
Starke County Humane Society Inc

Animal shelter

Animals
5
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
6
Fort Wayne Pitbull Coalition

our mission is to improve the conditions for pit bull type dogs in northern indiana through education public awareness and by providing resources for pit bulls in need.

Animals
7
Loving Paws Animal Center
Animals
8
Peace for Paws Ohio Inc

Assist with homeless pet overpopulation in ohio by providing education and financial support for spay and neuter efforts, financing shelter rescue fees, organizing basic veterinary care, facilitating transportation for companion animals…

Human Services
9
Action for Animals Inc

Incorporated in 1980 afa inc is an all volunteer, non-profit organization dedicated to helping the stray animals of delaware county indiana. we take in stray cats of the county, provide medical care, spay/neuter surgery, and placement into…

Animals
10
Partners for Animal Welfare Society

To promote animal welfare in hancock county through humane education and pet population control by: developing and providing humane education programs that teach kindness to and respect for all living things. helping animals housed in…

Animals
11
Lawrence Humane Society

The lawrence humane society nurtures the human-animal bond by providing shelter, care and advocacy for homeless and abused animals, as well as resource for the pets and people in our community

Animals
12
Wayne County Humane Society
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fort Wayne Zoological Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Assisting Hands Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH CHURCH OF CHRIST: $92,631 · OtherNORTH CHURCH OF CHRISTPROMISE POINTE: $63,070 · OtherPROMISE POINTECONNERSVILLE CHURCH OF CHRIST: $32,860 · OtherCONNERSVILLE CHURCH OF CHRISTIndividual grant recipient: $28,554 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFORT WAYNE PHILHARMONIC: $15,000 · OtherFORT WAYNE PHILHARMONICIndividual grant recipient: $11,000 · Other+21 more: $32,000 · Other+21 moreSHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $13,000 · Human ServicesSHELTERING…ASSISTING HANDS FOUNDATION INC: $9,026 · Human ServicesASSISTING …4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $7,800 · Human Services4 PAWS FOR…HUMANE FORT WAYNE INC: $7,500 · AnimalsFORT WAYNE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $7,500 · AnimalsFAYETTE COUNTY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyHOPE PREGNANCY CENTER DBA HOPE CENTER: $2,250 · HealthFORT WAYNE BALLET INC: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$275,115Human Services$29,826Animals$15,000Philanthropy$5,000Health$2,250Arts & Culture$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $13,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetASSISTING HANDS FOUNDATION INC: $9,026 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetHUMANE FORT WAYNE INC: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WAYNE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFAYETTE COUNTY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAPPLE HOUSE PRESCHOOL COOPERATIVE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetHOPE PREGNANCY CENTER DBA HOPE CENTER: $2,250 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetFORT WAYNE BALLET INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTING HANDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds 4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE FORT WAYNE INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT WAYNE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FAYETTE COUNTY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds APPLE HOUSE PRESCHOOL COOPERATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE PREGNANCY CENTER DBA HOPE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FORT WAYNE BALLET INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC11.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Better Way Foundation Ltd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Better Way Foundation Ltd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Better Way Foundation Ltd?

    Find your warmest path to The Better Way Foundation Ltd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Better Way Foundation Ltd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph