Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Benedict Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$360k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Environment$530kEducation$310kYouth Development$300kEmployment$25kCivil Rights$20kArts & Culture$10kHealth$5k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE MIAMI VALLEY SCHOOL$250,000
INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST$50,000
YOUTH SAILING FOUNDATION OF IRC$25,000
MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDENS$15,000
SOUTHERN PREPARATORY ACADEMY$15,000
THE VNA AND HOSPICE FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%LA PAZ CHATTANOOGA: $10k → 12%LA PAZ CHATTANOOGA: $10k → 12%GIFFORD YOUTH ACHEIVEMENT CENTER: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$795k · 8 repeat orgs$405k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$795k
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+33%

Still filing today

88%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $270k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $190k · revenue +23%
  • MB
    MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $105k · revenue +36%
  • OR
    OCEAN RESEARCH & CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $95k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • UA
    UNITED AGAINST POVERTY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • EL
    ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +33%
  • HB
    HARBOR BRANCH OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2020 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marine Discovery Center

Protect florida coastal ecosystem via education, research and community stewardship.

Arts & Culture
2
Tennessee Aquarium

The mission of the Tennessee Aquarium is to connect people with nature and empower them to make informed decisions about water and wildlife.

Animals
3
Marine Resources Council of East Florida Inc

The mission of the marine resources council (mrc) is to maintain and enhance the quality of marine systems for the economic, recreational, aesthetic, and environmental use for the people of florida

Environment
4
Mote Marine Laboratory Inc

The advancement of marine and environmental sciences through scientific research, education and public outreach, leading new discoveries, revitalization and sustainability of our oceans and greater public understanding of our marine…

5
Ocean Research and Educational
Science & Tech
6
Riverside Conservancy Inc

To create and expand sustainable living shorelines through educational outreach and land conservancy programs that utilize community-engaged design and to promote the heritage of working waterfronts and healthy habitats for the benefit of…

Environment
7
Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc

In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…

Environment
8
Clean Reefs
Environment
9
Archbold Expeditions Inc

Archbold expeditions, inc.'s mission is to build and share the scientific knowledge needed to protect the life, lands, and waters of the heart of florida and beyond.

Unclassified
10
The Everglades Trust Inc

To preserve america's everglades and florida bay as natural resources.

11
Wildlands Conservation Inc

Preservation of the environment through ecological research to preserve our national heritage

Environment
12
The Coral Reef and Marine Science Foundation Inc C/O James Bildner

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Learning Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Ridgefield Playhouse for Movies and the Performing Arts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YOUTH SAILING FOUNDATION OF IRC — $275,000 · OtherYOUTH SAILING FOUNDATION OF IRCEDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED DBA THE MIAMI VALLEY SCHOOL — $250,000 · OtherEDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED DBA THE MIAMI VALLEY SC…UNITED AGAINST POVERTY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — $25,000 · Other+5 more — $70,000 · Other+5 moreINDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC — $190,000 · EnvironmentINDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INCMCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $105,000 · EnvironmentMCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INCOCEAN RESEARCH & CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC — $95,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN RESEARCH & CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INCTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 · EnvironmentTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INCREFLECTION RIDING ARBORETUM AND NATURE CENTER — $25,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC — $25,000 · Environment+2 more — $15,000 · EnvironmentTHE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC — $45,000 · EducationLA PAZ DE DIOS INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesGIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE RIDGEFIELD PLAYHOUSE FOR MOVIES AND THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$620,000Environment$495,000Education$45,000Human Services$30,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED DBA THE MIAMI VALLEY SCHOOL — $250,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetINDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC — $190,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetMCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $105,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetOCEAN RESEARCH & CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC — $95,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetTHE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC — $45,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetREFLECTION RIDING ARBORETUM AND NATURE CENTER — $25,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetLA PAZ DE DIOS INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE RIDGEFIELD PLAYHOUSE FOR MOVIES AND THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCoastal Connections Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetGIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Olivia Delacruz Foundation IncGA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Olivia Delacruz Foundation Inc · The Prentice Foundation Inc · Indian River Community Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Benedict Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • The Ridgefield Playhouse for Movies and the Performing Arts Inc1% of income from government
  • Indian River Land Trust Inc0% of income from government
  • The Learning Alliance Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph