Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Beaver Medical Clinic Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.0MEducation$561kHealth$11kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCR FOUNDATION CONTRIBUTIONS$10,000
CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE (CUSM)$10,000
CRY-ROP EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$5,150
U OF REDLANDS CONTRIBUTIONS$5,000
REDLANDS COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$4,750
Individual grant recipient$3,500
WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
YUCAIPA HIGH SCHOOL$2,500
SAN BERNARDINO COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP ASSOCIATION$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
CSUSB PHILANTRHOPIC FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$1,000
OAK VIEW HIGH SCHOOL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 65% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CRY ROP FOUNDATION: $7k → 14%WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $5k → 14%BEAUMONT CONTRIBUTIONS: $4k → 11%CRY ROP FOUNDATION: $7k → 14%WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $3k → 14%BEAUMONT ADULT CONTRIBUTION: $4k → 11%CRY ROP: $6k → 14%BEAUMONT ADULT SCHOOL: $4k → 11%CRY ROP FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%CRY ROP: $5k → 14%CRY ROP FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%CRY-ROP EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%CRY ROP FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%CITRUS VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 14%REDLANDS EAST VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 14%ORANGEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 14%CRY ROP FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE: $40k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE: $20k → 11%UCR FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE: $20k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE: $20k → 11%UCR FOUNDATION CONTRIBUTIONS: $10k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE: $5k → 11%BANNING HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 11%CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE: $20k → 14%CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE (CUSM): $10k → 14%CRAFTON HILLS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%YUCAIPA HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 14%REDLANDS COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $14k → 14%REDLANDS COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $14k → 14%REDLANDS COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $14k → 14%REDLANDS COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $12k → 14%REDLANDS COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $9k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $5k → 14%U OF REDLANDS CONTRIBUTIONS: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $5k → 14%REDLANDS COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%REDLANDS HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$439k · 28 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
24

Total granted

$439k
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+17%

Still filing today

25%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    Redlands Community Scholarship Foundation
    7× · 2018–2025 · $69k · revenue +63%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +3%
  • CH
    CRAFTON HILLS COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $16k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • UF
    UCR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • CU
    CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +17%
  • RE
    REDLANDS EAST VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
2
San Diego County Citizens' Scholars Foundation
—
3
California University of Management and Sciences

The schools mission is to provide a high quality and affordable education and to serve the intellectual and professional needs ofindividuals and organizations.

Education
4
Redlands Community College Foundation I

To raise, invest, and manage funds and resources in order to provide for scholarships, grants, and capital support for redlands community college.

Education
5
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
6
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
7
Cal State East Bay Educational Foundation

To accept and manage restricted and unrestricted gifts benefiting california state university east bay. additionally, the trustees support the university through advocacy, development, personal contributions and counsel to the university's…

Education
8
Rio Hondo College Foundation

The Rio Hondo College Foundation is a non-profit organization that provides financial assistance for scholarships and programs which meet the needs of Rio Hondo College's students.

Education
9
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
10
California University - Silicon Valley

Providing professional training of Chinese Medicine (TCM), including acupuncture, Chinese herbology, acupressure, Qigong and so on, granting the students Masters degree. Its a three to four years teaching program.

Education
11
The University Foundation At Sacramento State

Raise private resources to advance the mission and priorities of the university and serve as ambassadors in the community. provide stewardship in the prudent investment of resources and ensure the integrity of the foundation through…

Education
12
California State University Foundation

Established in 1962, the foundation is the central foundation for the california state university (csu) system and serves the office of the chancellor. the foundation exists to support excellence in teaching and learning, and to serve the…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Redlands; the most unlike its peers is Redlands Historical Museum Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REDLANDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · EducationREDLANDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONRedlands Community Scholarship Foundation: $69,000 · EducationRedlands Community Scholarship FoundationUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $40,000 · Education+5 more: $62,500 · Education+5 moreUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE: $120,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVE…CRYROP FOUNDATION INC: $32,960 · OtherCRYROP FOUNDATION INCUCR FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Other+53 more: $231,840 · Other+53 moreCSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $3,000 · PhilanthropyREDLANDS HISTORICAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC: $2,180 · Arts & Culture
Education$1,171,500Other$404,800Philanthropy$3,000Arts & Culture$2,180

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREDLANDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetRedlands Community Scholarship Foundation: $69,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRAFTON HILLS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSan Bernardino Community Scholarship Association: $15,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetWESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYUCAIPA VALLEY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $9,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GROVE SCHOOL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREDLANDS HISTORICAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC: $2,180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN BERNARDINO VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REDLANDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Redlands Community Scholarship Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds CRAFTON HILLS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds San Bernardino Community Scholarship Association ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds YUCAIPA VALLEY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Inland Empire Community FoundationCA15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Beaver Medical Clinic Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Beaver Medical Clinic Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Beaver Medical Clinic Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Beaver Medical Clinic Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Beaver Medical Clinic’s filings →

    More from the funding graph