· Private foundation
The Beaver Medical Clinic Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UCR FOUNDATION CONTRIBUTIONS | $10,000 |
| CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE (CUSM) | $10,000 |
| CRY-ROP EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION | $5,150 |
| U OF REDLANDS CONTRIBUTIONS | $5,000 |
| REDLANDS COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION | $4,750 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,500 |
| WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES | $3,000 |
| SAN BERNARDINO COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP ASSOCIATION | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| YUCAIPA HIGH SCHOOL | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| CSUSB PHILANTRHOPIC FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| OAK VIEW HIGH SCHOOL | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 65% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RCRedlands Community Scholarship Foundation7× · 2018–2025 · $69k · revenue +63%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +3%
- CHCRAFTON HILLS COLLEGE FOUNDATION6× · 2019–2024 · $16k · revenue +67%
Funded once
- CUCALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINEone grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +17%
- UFUCR FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $20k
- REREDLANDS EAST VALLEY HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2017 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.
The schools mission is to provide a high quality and affordable education and to serve the intellectual and professional needs ofindividuals and organizations.
To raise, invest, and manage funds and resources in order to provide for scholarships, grants, and capital support for redlands community college.
A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.
A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.
To accept and manage restricted and unrestricted gifts benefiting california state university east bay. additionally, the trustees support the university through advocacy, development, personal contributions and counsel to the university's…
The Rio Hondo College Foundation is a non-profit organization that provides financial assistance for scholarships and programs which meet the needs of Rio Hondo College's students.
The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…
Providing professional training of Chinese Medicine (TCM), including acupuncture, Chinese herbology, acupressure, Qigong and so on, granting the students Masters degree. Its a three to four years teaching program.
Raise private resources to advance the mission and priorities of the university and serve as ambassadors in the community. provide stewardship in the prudent investment of resources and ensure the integrity of the foundation through…
Established in 1962, the foundation is the central foundation for the california state university (csu) system and serves the office of the chancellor. the foundation exists to support excellence in teaching and learning, and to serve the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Redlands and the most unlike its peers is Redlands Historical Museum Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds REDLANDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Redlands Community Scholarship Foundation ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds CRAFTON HILLS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds San Bernardino Community Scholarship Association ↗
- Who funds WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds YUCAIPA VALLEY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Beaver Medical Clinic Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Beaver Medical Clinic Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Beaver Medical Clinic Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.