Skip to content
The Beauregard Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Beauregard Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$500k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$249k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$2.0MPhilanthropy$1.2MEducation$100kInternational$44kArts & Culture$14kSocial Science$10kHealth$9kPublic Benefit$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $499k
$200,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE$249,000
OPERATION OPEN ARMS INC$200,000
TAKING BACK OUR NEIGHBORHOOD$50,000
STUDENTS SHOLDER TO SHOLDER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE: $5k → 19%UNITED BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $30 → 7%ATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES: $15k → 14%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $17k → 9%SWIM ACROSS AMERICA: $1k → 10%STUDENTS SHOLDER TO SHOLDER: $1k → 7%THE WILSON CENTER: $10k → 10%THE BUTLER FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%UKRANIAN PENTACOSTAL CHURCH: $1k → 12%GREENHILL THERAPY: $1k → 15%ATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES: $10k → 14%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $3k → 9%SWIM ACROSS AMERICA: $1k → 10%GILDA'S CLUB: $5k → 15%SWIM ACROSS AMERICA: $1k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE: $329k → 15%SWIM ACROSS AMERICA: $1k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE: $249k → 15%SWIM ACROSS AMERICA: $1k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE: $222k → 15%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE: $167k → 15%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE: $106k → 15%EVOLVE 502: $100k → 15%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE: $63k → 15%OPERATION OPEN ARMS INC: $275k → 15%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE: $25k → 15%OPERATION OPEN ARMS INC: $275k → 15%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%OPERATION OPEN ARMS INC: $251k → 15%THE LOUISVILLE BALLET: $3k → 15%OPERATION OPEN ARMS INC: $227k → 15%LOUISVILLE YOUTH CHOIR: $1k → 15%TAKING BACK OUR NEIGHBORHOOD: $50k → 15%TAKING BACK OUR NEIGHBORHOOD: $39k → 15%TAKING BACK OUR NEIGHBORHOOD: $10k → 15%TAKING BACK OUR NEIGHBORHOOD: $5k → 15%OPERATION OPEN ARMS INC: $400k → 15%OPERATION OPEN ARMS INC: $200k → 15%OPERATION OPEN ARMS INC: $200k → 15%OPERATION OPEN ARMS INC: $113k → 15%SILKS IN THE BLUEGRASS: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IN
CT
CA
CO
KY
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 5 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
12

Total granted

$2.1M
$139k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
-2%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCrime & LegalInternationalPhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OO
    OPERATION OPEN ARMS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +34% · 89% of their budget
  • TB
    TAKING BACK OUR NEIGHBORHOOD TOGETHER INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $104k · revenue +900% · 100% of their budget
  • AC
    ATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $25k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • EI
    EVOLVE502 INC
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -42%
  • SI
    SILKS IN THE BLUEGRASS
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • TW
    THE WILSON CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Leadership Foundation

The leadership foundation, inc. (the foundation), established in 1990, is the mechanism by which iwf members advance the next generation of women leaders. the foundation accelerates the careers of top-performing women by offering…

—
2
Chicago Blend Group Inc

Creating a more inclusive venture capital and entrepreneurial ecosystem.

Community Improvement
3
The Council
—
4
Gordon Research Conferences Inc

The gordon research conferences, inc. provide an international forum for the presentation and discussion of frontier research in the biological, chemical, physical and engineering sciences and their interfaces. *see schedule o*

Science & Tech
5
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
6
Coalition Against Childhood Cancer

Collaborative network to support & serve the childhood cancer community.

Health
7
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
8
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—
9
Neighborhood Solidarity Fund

Invest stl facilitates investment in the power of people and their neighborhoods to develop communities of justice and opportunity in places that continue to endure the legacy of systemic anti-black racism.

Community Improvement
10
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
11
Council of Chief Judges of the State Courts of Appeal

The council was formed as a vehicle for collective consultation and as a conduit for the exchange of ideas on court administration, rules and methods of procedure, and the organization and operation of state courts of appeal. the council…

Public Benefit
12
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc; the most unlike its peers is Taking Back Our Neighborhood Together Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OPERATION OPEN ARMS INC: $1,940,500 · Crime & LegalOPERATION OPEN ARMS INCTAKING BACK OUR NEIGHBORHOOD TOGETHER INC: $104,000 · Crime & LegalTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE INC: $1,160,500 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE…+2 more: $6,000 · PhilanthropyEVOLVE502 INC: $100,000 · OtherSILKS IN THE BLUEGRASS: $10,000 · OtherTHE WILSON CENTER: $10,000 · OtherGILDA'S CLUB KENTUCKIANA INC: $5,000 · Other+3 more: $2,500 · OtherATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC: $25,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $19,025 · InternationalTHE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE: $5,000 · EducationTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,464 · HealthGreen Hill Therapy Inc: $1,000 · Health+1 more: $30 · HealthKENTUCKY DANCE COUNCIL INC DBA LOUISVILLE BALLET: $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Crime & Legal$2,044,500Philanthropy$1,166,500Other$127,500International$44,025Education$5,000Health$4,494Arts & Culture$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPERATION OPEN ARMS INC: $1,940,500 over 8y, 89% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE INC: $1,160,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTAKING BACK OUR NEIGHBORHOOD TOGETHER INC: $104,000 over 4y, 100% of budgetEVOLVE502 INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $19,025 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB KENTUCKIANA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSwim Across America Inc: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,464 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY DANCE COUNCIL INC DBA LOUISVILLE BALLET: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTUDENTS SHOULDER-TO-SHOULDER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGreen Hill Therapy Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOUISVILLE YOUTH CHOIR INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE BUTLER FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cralle Foundation IncThe Gheens Foundation…The Whas Crusade for …LG&E and Ku Foundatio…The Community Foundat…Mightycause Charitabl…Baird Foundation IncAmerican Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Cralle Foundation IncKY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cralle Foundation Inc · The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Whas Crusade for Children Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Beauregard Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Beauregard Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Beauregard’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home