Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Beach Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$791k
Granted FY2024still arriving
57
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Public Benefit$922kCivil Rights$809kEducation$384kScience & Tech$376kCrime & Legal$258kSocial Science$188kCommunity Improvement$125kAnimals$70kOther$0
02FY2024 · 57 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k32 grants · $76k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $315k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $400k
$5,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$8.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMONWEATLH FOUNDATION$100,000
ATLAS NETWORK$100,000
FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION$50,000
FOUNDATION FOR GOVT ACCOUNTABILITY$50,000
STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY$50,000
REASON FOUNDATION$50,000
EMBER CLUB$25,000
FAIRNESS CENTER$25,000
COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE$25,000
RODEO AUSTIN$25,000
REALCLEAR FOUNDATION$25,000
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION$20,000
INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE$20,000
CATO INSTITUTE$20,000
FREEDOM FOUNDATION$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%BALD PEAK COMMUNITY FUND: $1k → 9%BALD PEAK COMMUNITY FUND: $1k → 9%BALD PEAK COMMUNITY FUND: $1k → 9%BALD PEAK COMMUNITY FUND: $1k → 9%BALD PEAK COMMUNITY FUND: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
MT
IL
NY
MA
IN
PA
CA
VA
MD
AZ
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 63 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

63 repeat relationships: 45 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

63
10

Total granted

$3.3M
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+167%

Still filing today

68%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEnvironmentPublic BenefitCrime & LegalSocial ScienceCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE REASON FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $305k · revenue +41%
  • SF
    STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $245k · revenue +34%
  • FF
    Foundation for Economic Education Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $135k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • GF
    GMU FOUND (GEORGE MASON)
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • PU
    PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +112%
  • SE
    SEEKING EDUCATION EXCELLENCEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue ×1,165
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
4
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
5
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
6
Legal Advocates for Safe Science and Technology Inc

Using legal advocacy to make advances in science and technology safer for people and the planet.

Science & Tech
7
The Campaign Legal Center Inc

The nonpartisan campaign legal center advances democracy through law at the federal, state and local levels, fighting for every american's rights to responsive government and a fair opportunity to participate in and affect the democratic…

Crime & Legal
8
R Street Institute

The r street institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, public-policy research organization ("think tank"). our mission is to engage in policy research and outreach to promote free markets and limited, effective government. (continued on…

Education
9
Frontiers of Freedom Institute

To educate the public on constitutional issues and public policy matters. We are dedicated to the principles of individual liberty, peace through strength, limited government, free enterprise, and the values embodied in the Declaration of…

Public Benefit
10
Litigators for Liberty Network

Support public interest litigators by leveraging resources and creating opportunities for collaboration to advance freedom under the rule of law.

Crime & Legal
11
Center for American Progress

The center for american progress (cap) is an independent nonpartisan policy institute that is dedicated to improving the lives of all americans through bold, progressive ideas, as well as strong leadership and concerted action. our aim is…

Civil Rights
12
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Freedomworks Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
55/56
Grantees still filing
46/56
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMONWEATLH FOUNDATION: $400,000 · OtherCOMMONWEATLH FOUNDATIONATLAS NETWORK: $375,000 · OtherATLAS NETWORKFOUNDATION FOR GOVT ACCOUNTABILITY: $240,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR GOVT ACCOUNTABILITYFIRE (FOUND FOR IND RIGHTS IN EDU): $200,000 · OtherFIRE (FOUND FOR IND RIGHTS IN EDU)COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $125,000 · OtherCOMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTETHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES: $75,000 · OtherPERC: $75,000 · Other+48 more: $521,237 · Other+48 moreTHE REASON FOUNDATION: $305,000 · EducationTHE REASON FOUNDATIONSTUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC: $245,000 · EducationSTUDENTS FOR LIBERTY …EdChoice Inc: $45,000 · EducationEdChoice IncREAL CLEAR FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Education+5 more: $26,000 · EducationCATO INSTITUTE: $115,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $22,000 · Public BenefitLeadership Institute: $20,000 · Public BenefitYOUNG AMERICANS FOR LIBERTY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Public BenefitILLINOIS POLICY INSTITUTE: $18,000 · Public Benefit+1 more: $5,000 · Public BenefitINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $110,000 · Civil RightsSTATE POLICY NETWORK: $75,000 · Civil Rights+1 more: $2,000 · Civil RightsFoundation for Economic Education Inc: $135,000 · Social ScienceAmericans for Prosperity Foundation: $20,000 · Social Science+1 more: $4,000 · Social SciencePacific Legal Foundation: $85,000 · Crime & LegalTHE FAIRNESS CENTER INC: $50,000 · Crime & LegalLIBERTY JUSTICE CENTER: $9,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $4,000 · Crime & LegalLoon Preservation Committee: $45,000 · EnvironmentSQUAM LAKES NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER: $25,000 · EnvironmentSQUAM LAKES ASSOCIATION: $12,500 · EnvironmentSQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $12,000 · EnvironmentNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $5,000 · Environment+1 more: $1,400 · Environment
Other$2,011,237Education$651,000Public Benefit$200,000Civil Rights$187,000Social Science$159,000Crime & Legal$148,000Environment$100,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE REASON FOUNDATION: $305,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetSTUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC: $245,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetFoundation for Economic Education Inc: $135,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCOMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $125,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $115,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $110,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation: $85,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSTATE POLICY NETWORK: $75,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES: $75,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FAIRNESS CENTER INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGRANITE STATE ADAPTIVE: $50,000 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetEdChoice Inc: $45,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLoon Preservation Committee: $45,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $40,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetREAL CLEAR FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFREEDOMWORKS FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSQUAM LAKES NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetRODEO AUSTIN: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYoung Voices: $25,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $22,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmericans for Prosperity Foundation: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG AMERICANS FOR LIBERTY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetILLINOIS POLICY INSTITUTE: $18,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFREE TO CHOOSE NETWORK INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSQUAM LAKES ASSOCIATION: $12,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $12,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetInstitute for Humane Studies: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNETWORK OF ENLIGHTENED WOMEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCERTELL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE JACK MILLER CENTER FOR TEACHING AMERICA'S FOUNDING PRINCIPLES AND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLIBERTY JUSTICE CENTER: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBALD PEAK COMMUNITY FUND: $5,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMOVING PICTURE INSTITUTE: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAW ENFORCEMENT ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFOREIGN POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercatus Center Inc: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCITRS INC: $3,357 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE REASON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Economic Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
  • Who funds STATE POLICY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds THE FAIRNESS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GRANITE STATE ADAPTIVE ↗
  • Who funds EdChoice Inc ↗
  • Who funds Loon Preservation Committee ↗
  • Who funds THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REAL CLEAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOMWORKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SQUAM LAKES NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RODEO AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds Young Voices ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds Americans for Prosperity Foundation ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG AMERICANS FOR LIBERTY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds FREE TO CHOOSE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SQUAM LAKES ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Institute for Humane Studies ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dunn FoundationDE32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dunn Foundation · Donors Trust Inc · John William Pope Foundation · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Lovett-Woodsum Foundation Inc · Sarah Scaife Foundation Incorporated · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Charles Koch Foundation · The Armstrong Foundation · Charles Koch Institute · Triad Foundation Inc · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Beach Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Beach Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Beach Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Beach Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Beach’s filings →

More from the funding graph