· Private foundation
The Dunn Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k29 grants · $725k
- $50k–250k24 grants · $2.1M
- $250k+11 grants · $7.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONSERVATIVE PARTNERSHIP INSTITUTE | $2,500,000 |
| TURNING POINT USA INC | $1,000,000 |
| COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC POLICY ALTERNAT | $725,000 |
| ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM | $540,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY INC | $500,000 |
| PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $400,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION IN | $380,000 |
| AMERICA FIRST POLICY INSTITUTE | $350,000 |
| FAIRNESS CENTER INC | $275,000 |
| ATLAS ECONOMIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION - ATLAS NETWORK | $250,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $250,000 |
| STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INCORPORATED | $220,000 |
| INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE | $155,000 |
| EPOCH TIMES ASSOCIATION INC | $150,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION INC | $125,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $365k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against -5% for the ones you funded once.
69 repeat relationships — 54 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $290k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TPTURNING POINT USA INC6× · 2019–2024 · $5.1M · revenue +304%
- FFFOUNDATION FOR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY INC6× · 2019–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +121%
- FFFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC6× · 2019–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +266%
Funded once
- BFBLEXIT FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2019 · $250k
- CDCITIZENS DEFENDING FREEDOM FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +262%
- DTDONORS TRUSTone grant, 2019 · $125k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
To educate the public on constitutional issues and public policy matters. We are dedicated to the principles of individual liberty, peace through strength, limited government, free enterprise, and the values embodied in the Declaration of…
To provide thoughtful, conservative solutions to the challenges presented by education, workforce, labor and employment issues.
The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…
Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.
The mission of the freedom forum institute is to champion the five freedoms of the first amendment through education and entertainment.
The liberal patriot (tlp) is a digital newsletter focused on american politics and public policy. tlp aims to provide readers with honest analysis and original commentary to help advance a vital center perspective in american life.
To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…
Iri advances freedom and democracy worldwide by developing political parties, civic institutions, open elections, democratic governance and the rule of law.
The r street institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, public-policy research organization ("think tank"). our mission is to engage in policy research and outreach to promote free markets and limited, effective government. (continued on…
The organization provides public education on artificial intelligence.
To teach and disseminate educational materials to the public.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Accountability Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Remember Honor Support Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
96 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 96 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Conservative Partnership Institute ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC POLICY ALTERNATIVES ↗
- Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICANS FOR FAIR TREATMENT INC ↗
- Who funds FREEDOMWORKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE FAIRNESS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
- Who funds AMERICA FIRST POLICY INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds Donors Trust Inc ↗
- Who funds PROPERTY AND ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
- Who funds YOUNG AMERICANS FOR LIBERTY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BLEXIT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE REASON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Foundation for Economic Education Inc ↗
- Who funds COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE JAMES MADISON INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES INC ↗
- Who funds STATE POLICY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE ↗
- Who funds THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES ↗
- Who funds Moms for America Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUNG AMERICANS AGAINST SOCIALISM ↗
- Who funds DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER ↗
- Who funds America First Legal Foundation ↗
- Who funds FREE TO CHOOSE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds MACKINAC CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE KING'S ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR GUN RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE EPOCH TIMES ASSOCIATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donors Trust Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Sarah Scaife Foundation Incorporated · Triad Foundation Inc · The Searle Freedom Trust · Adolph Coors Foundation · Charles Koch Foundation · Charles Koch Institute · The Beach Foundation · The Chase Foundation of Virginia · The Armstrong Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Dunn Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Remember Honor Support Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Dunn Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Dunn Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.