Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bawd Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$257k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.6MScience & Tech$680kHealth$528kYouth Development$283kEnvironment$253kAnimals$125kPhilanthropy$45kHuman Services$36kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE JACKSON LABORATORY$100,000
THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY$50,000
LIVERESEARCH INC$30,000
PSSI WASHINGTON INC$25,000
ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER$15,000
CHRISTODORA$7,500
PLEASANT RIVER WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$5,000
TRINITY SCHOOL$5,000
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI$5,000
UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$3,000
INTEGRATE AUTISM EMPLOYMENT ADVISORS$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$2,500
THE SAVANNAH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$1,000
THE WILD CENTER$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RISING GROUND: $10k → 9%RISING GROUND: $10k → 20%RISING GROUND: $5k → 9%RISING GROUND: $10k → 20%INTEGRATE AUTISM EMPLOYMENT ADVISORS: $3k → 17%INTEGRATE AUTISM EMPLOYMENT ADVISORS: $1k → 17%INTEGRATE AUTISM EMPLOYMENT ADVISORS: $1k → 17%INTEGRATE AUTISM EMPLOYMENT ADVISORS: $3k → 17%INTEGRATE AUTISM EMPLOYMENT ADVISORS: $3k → 17%INTEGRATE AUTISM EMPLOYMENT ADVISORS: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
ND
MI
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
VA
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 21 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
6

Total granted

$2.3M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+58%

Still filing today

76%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationAnimalsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TJ
    THE JACKSON LABORATORY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $680k · revenue +74%
  • TR
    THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $540k · revenue +33%
  • PW
    PSSI WASHINGTON INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $270k · revenue +303% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +103%
  • MD
    MOUNT DESERT ISLAND HOSPITALgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +58%
  • NW
    N WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
6
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
7
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
8
Howard Hughes Medical Institute

The mission of the institute has remained constant since its founding in 1953. as its restated articles of incorporation state the primary purpose and objective of the howard hughes medical institute shall be the promotion of human…

Health
9
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
10
The Graduate School of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research

The graduate school of the stowers institute for medical research ("gssimr") exempt purpose is to provide graduate education that will prepare scholars for scientific research in the biological sciences.

Education
11
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
12
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Park School Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Liveresearch Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,043,500 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIATHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $540,000 · EducationTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY+3 more: $31,000 · EducationTHE JACKSON LABORATORY: $680,000 · HealthTHE JACKSON LABORATORYDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $200,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute In…LIVERESEARCH INC: $121,500 · HealthLIVERESEARCH INC+1 more: $2,500 · HealthTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $250,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSE…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT SAN DIEGO: $150,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE U…TRINITY SCHOOL: $27,500 · OtherUniversity of Michigan: $25,500 · OtherUC BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $35,000 · OtherFOOD BANK FOR NE…+8 more: $18,250 · OtherPSSI WASHINGTON INC: $270,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $65,000 · AnimalsDelta Waterfowl Foundation: $60,000 · AnimalsPLEASANT RIVER WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $45,000 · PhilanthropyChristodora Inc: $12,500 · PhilanthropyRISING GROUND INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesINTEGRATE AUTISM EMPLOYMENT ADVISORS INC: $12,000 · Human Services
Education$1,614,500Health$1,004,000Other$526,250Youth Development$270,000Animals$125,000Philanthropy$57,500Human Services$47,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,043,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JACKSON LABORATORY: $680,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $540,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPSSI WASHINGTON INC: $270,000 over 9y, 26% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $250,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIVERESEARCH INC: $121,500 over 8y, 100% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $65,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDelta Waterfowl Foundation: $60,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPLEASANT RIVER WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 9y, 20% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRISING GROUND INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $25,500 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChristodora Inc: $12,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetINTEGRATE AUTISM EMPLOYMENT ADVISORS INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetPARK SCHOOL CORPORATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT DESERT ISLAND HOSPITAL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVANNAH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNISWA ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds THE JACKSON LABORATORY ↗
  • Who funds THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PSSI WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIVERESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Delta Waterfowl Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PLEASANT RIVER WILDLIFE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds RISING GROUND INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds Christodora Inc ↗
  • Who funds INTEGRATE AUTISM EMPLOYMENT ADVISORS INC ↗
  • Who funds PARK SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS ↗
  • Who funds THE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT DESERT ISLAND HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds SAVANNAH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds NISWA ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bawd Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bawd Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The Filmmakers Collaborative Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Bawd Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Bawd Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bawd’s filings →

More from the funding graph