Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Barth Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$63kReligion$46kHealth$6kFood & Nutrition$1kAnimals$1kHuman Services$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,100
Median grant
3
States reached
$369k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN$5,400
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC$5,300
AMERICAN FRIENDS ERETZ CHEMDA$4,140
VARIOUS CHARITIES$2,100
CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL$1,800
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MEOROS DAF HAYO$1,400
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EZRA LMARPEH$1,380
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN: $7k → 6%CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL: $2k → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ITIM: $1k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN: $5k → 14%THE GESHER FOUNDATION: $500 → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MEOROS HADAF HAYOMI: $2k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ERETZ: $7k → 14%VARIOUS CHARITIES: $6k → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL: $1k → 7%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN: $4k → 6%CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL: $2k → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HAAM: $500 → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN: $4k → 14%THE GESHER FOUNDATION: $500 → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MEOROS DAF HAYO: $1k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS ERETZ CHEMDA: $4k → 14%VARIOUS CHARITIES: $2k → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KEREN MALKI: $500 → 7%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN: $4k → 6%CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL: $2k → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HAAM: $500 → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MEOROS HADAF HAYOMI: $1k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS ERETZ CHEMDA: $4k → 14%VARIOUS CHARITIES: $1k → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN: $4k → 6%THE CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL: $1k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS ERETZ CHEMDA: $4k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN: $4k → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS ERETZ CHEMDA: $4k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS ERETZ HE: $4k → 14%SHAVEI HEVRON INSTITUTION: $1k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS ERETZ CHEMDA: $4k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EZRA LMARPEH: $1k → 20%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $5k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EZRA LMARPEH: $1k → 20%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND: $5k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EZRA LMARPEH: $1k → 20%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND: $2k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EZRA LMARPEH: $1k → 20%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND: $2k → 17%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $2k → 17%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND: $2k → 17%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND: $2k → 17%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $2k → 17%BNEI AKIVA OF THE US AND CANADA: $4k → 17%BNEI AKIVA OF THE US AND CANADA: $3k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CARNEI HAIR: $1k → 20%BNEI AKIVA OF THE US AND CANADA: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$99k · 14 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +101% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
9

Total granted

$99k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+101%
+41%

Still filing today

57%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $31k · revenue +59%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ERETZ HEMDAH
    7× · 2017–2024 · $30k · revenue +53%
  • RZ
    RELIGIOUS ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENT BNEI AKIVA OF THE US AND CANADA INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $7k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +169%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CARNEI HAIR
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ITIM INC
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
2
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
3
American Friends of Shviti Hashem Inc

To support and promote the study of torah (bible) among members of jewish faith worldwide.

Religion
4
American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef

The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.

Religion
5
American Friends of Mosdot Meir of Israel Inc

To support jewish religious education

Philanthropy
6
American Friends of Kulo Zakai Inc

American Friends of Kulo Zakai Inc provides support to Jewish educational institutions that further religious observance, Torah study, and education in Israel and the US, in order to strengthen the continuity of the Jewish People.

International
7
American Friends of Yad Eliezer-Bei Shemesh

Relief of poverty by means of grants to social service agencies and to individual families in israel.

Philanthropy
8
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education
9
American Friends of Kehillas Shivtei Yeshurun Inc

Assistance to establish a community in ramat beit shemesh, israel, founded upon torah principles, prayer, justice, charity and kindness to all peoples. to encourage and promote jewish religious activities.

Religion
10
American Friends of Keshet Yehuda Nfp

religious and educational program for post high school youth

Philanthropy
11
American Friends of Tzir Hemed
Philanthropy
12
American Friends of Merkaz Hachinuch Habeer Inc

Provide aid to support and assist tax exempt Jewish religious education institutions or the equivalent in foreign countries.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Leket Israel Inc; the most unlike its peers is Congregation Dorg. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN INC: $30,600 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN INCPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $21,141 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC+2 more: $2,200 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ERETZ HEMDAH: $30,078 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ERETZ HEMDAHRELIGIOUS ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENT BNEI AKIVA OF THE US AND CANADA INC: $7,100 · InternationalRELIGIOUS ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENT BNEI AKIVA OF…Central Fund of Israel: $6,600 · InternationalCentral Fund of IsraelAMERICAN FRIENDS OF EZRA L MARPEH: $4,780 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF EZRA L MARPEH+3 more: $3,360 · International+3 moreVARIOUS CHARITIES: $9,054 · OtherVARIOUS CHARITIESAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MEOROS HADAF HAYOMI: $3,220 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MEOROS DAF HAYO: $1,400 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HAAM: $1,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF CARNEI HAIR: $1,000 · OtherKEREN AHAVAS CHESED: $1,000 · OtherEZER LANITZRACH: $720 · Other+5 more: $1,800 · Other+5 moreCONGREGATION DORG: $1,800 · ReligionWest Coast Vaad Hachesed: $180 · Religion
Philanthropy$53,941International$51,918Other$19,194Religion$1,980

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN INC: $30,600 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ERETZ HEMDAH: $30,078 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $21,141 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRELIGIOUS ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENT BNEI AKIVA OF THE US AND CANADA INC: $7,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $6,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF EZRA L MARPEH: $4,780 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetCONGREGATION DORG: $1,800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSHAVEI HEVRON INSTITUTIONS INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GESHER FOUNDATION INC: $1,360 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ITIM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KEREN MALKI INC: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWest Coast Vaad Hachesed: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ERETZ HEMDAH ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds RELIGIOUS ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENT BNEI AKIVA OF THE US AND CANADA INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EZRA L MARPEH ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION DORG ↗
  • Who funds SHAVEI HEVRON INSTITUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GESHER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ITIM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KEREN MALKI INC ↗
  • Who funds West Coast Vaad Hachesed ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY20.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Fjc · The Ojc Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Barth Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Barth Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Barth Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph