Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Baddour Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$989k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$336k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$350kRecreation & Sports$342kScience & Tech$251kHuman Services$221kHealth$134kReligion$128kEnvironment$63kHousing & Shelter$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $815
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $76k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $575k
  • $250k+1 grant · $336k
$50,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$362k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AERO CLUB OF NEW ENGLAND$336,316
NEW ENGLAND SECTION NINETY NINES$100,394
Individual grant recipient$100,000
CAPE AREA PILOTS ASSOCIATION$75,000
GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$50,000
DIGNITY MATTERS$50,000
CRADLES TO CRAYONS$50,000
WOMENS LUNCH PLACE$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$50,000
BUZZARDS BAY COALITION$36,000
CONCORD LAND CONSERVATION TRUST$25,000
MIAMI DADE HISTORICAL WARTIME MUSEU$15,000
SALVATION ARMY$500
TUNNELS TO TOWERS$315
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $161k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NEW ENGLAND VILLAGE: $5k → 8%DIGNITY MATTERS: $50k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $50k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 14%DIGNITY MATTERS: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
MT
MI
NY
MA
OH
CA
MO
TN
DC
OK
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$878k · 19 repeat orgs$827k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
50

Total granted

$878k
$226k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+29%

Still filing today

37%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $602k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationPublic BenefitHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AERO CLUB OF NEW ENGLAND
    2× · 2020–2025 · $340k · revenue +195%
  • MC
    Monadnock Community Hospital
    2× · 2021–2023 · $101k · revenue +27%
  • Dignity Matters Inc
    2× · 2023–2025 · $51k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • OL
    OUR LADY COMFORTER OF THE AFFLICTED
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • MA
    Mass. Air and Space Museum
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • WW
    WAI WOMEN IN AVIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New England Museum Association

New england museum association's mission is to connect a community engaged in learning, collaboration, and action to cultivate a better museum world.

2
Uss Constitution Museum Inc

The uss constitution museum engages all ages in the story of "old ironsides" to spark excitement about maritime heritage, naval service, and the american experience.

Arts & Culture
3
New England Historic Genealogical Society

New england historic genealogical society's mission is to advance the study of family history in america and beyond. we educate, inspire, and connect people through our scholarship, collections, and expertise. we conduct business under the…

4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

6
The Trustees of Reservations

Overview - founded in boston by pioneering landscape architect and open space visionary charles eliot in 1891, the trustees is the nation's first and the commonwealth's largest conservation and preservation nonprofit.

Environment
7
New England Aquarium Corporation

The new england aquarium is a catalyst for global change through public engagement and education, commitment to marine animal conservation, innovative scientific research, and effective advocacy for a vital and vibrant ocean.

Animals
8
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
9
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
10
Gore Place Society

The mission of gore place is to preserve and promote the 1806 country estate of christopher and rebecca gore as a unique community resource that tells the story of early 19th century american life.

Arts & Culture
11
Worcester Natural History Society Inc

The ecotarium's mission is to inspire a passion for science and nature among all members of the community through one-of-a-kind experiences, interactive exhibits, and accessible programming. as new england's leading science and nature…

Arts & Culture
12
Montauk Historical Society

The purpose of the montauk historical society is to collect, restore, preserve and display historically significant buildings, objects and writings and to preserve and share the history and cultures of montauk and the east end for this and…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connecticut Aeronautical Historical Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cape Area Pilots Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Advocacy and …Food Pantries and AssistancePregnancy Support CentersVeteran Support ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Childhood Cancer SupportFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Government Accountability &…Classical Music OrchestrasLocal History MuseumsAnimal Rescue and ShelterCommunity Hospital Systems
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%10%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr19%17%20–35yr14%31%35–55yr14%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%6%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr19%15%20–35yr14%57%35–55yr14%22%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
11%
4,714/42,328

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
21/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AERO CLUB OF NEW ENGLAND — $339,501 · OtherAERO CLUB OF NEW ENGLANDMASS AIR AND SPACE MUSEUM — $200,000 · OtherMASS AIR AND SPACE MUSEUMIndividual grant recipient — $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNEW ENGLAND SECTION NINETY NINES — $100,394 · OtherNEW ENGLAND SECTION NINETY NINESOUR LADY COMFORTER OF THE AFFLICTED — $100,000 · OtherOUR LADY COMFORTER OF THE AFFLICTEDDIVINE MERCY CHURCH — $99,137 · OtherDIVINE MERCY CHURCHWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC — $50,000 · OtherMass. Air and Space Museum — $50,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $50,000 · Other+56 more — $146,610 · Other+56 moreDignity Matters Inc — $50,500 · Human ServicesDignity Ma…CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesCRADLES TO…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $50,000 · Human ServicesAmerican N…+2 more — $10,000 · Human Services+2 moreMonadnock Community Hospital — $101,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $5,000 · HealthCAPE AREA PILOTS ASSOCIATION — $75,000 · Education+2 more — $415 · EducationBUZZARDS BAY COALITION — $36,000 · EnvironmentCONCORD LAND CONSERVATION TRUST — $25,000 · Environment+1 more — $200 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE UNBORN INC — $9,200 · Civil RightsMilton Animal League Inc — $7,600 · Animals
Other$1,285,642Human Services$160,500Health$106,000Education$75,415Environment$61,200Civil Rights$9,200Animals$7,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAERO CLUB OF NEW ENGLAND — $339,501 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetMonadnock Community Hospital — $101,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAPE AREA PILOTS ASSOCIATION — $75,000 over 1y, 85% of budgetDignity Matters Inc — $50,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE UNBORN INC — $9,200 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMilton Animal League Inc — $7,600 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND VILLAGE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELMONT HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNATIONAL WASP WWII MUSEUM INC — $525 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EXPLORERS CLUB — $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EARTH — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FORT TICONDEROGA ASSOCIATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSocial Register Foundation — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT AERONAUTICAL HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION INC — $55 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AERO CLUB OF NEW ENGLAND
  • Who funds Monadnock Community Hospital
  • Who funds CAPE AREA PILOTS ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds Dignity Matters Inc
  • Who funds WOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC
  • Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds BUZZARDS BAY COALITION
  • Who funds CONCORD LAND CONSERVATION TRUST
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE UNBORN INC
  • Who funds Milton Animal League Inc
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND VILLAGE INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ibm International FoundationNY12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ibm International Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Baddour Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 8%
  • New England Village Inc68% of income from government
  • Buzzards Bay Coalition37% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc22% of income from government
  • Women's Lunch Place Inc8% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc2% of income from government
  • Aero Club of New England0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Baddour Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Baddour Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph