Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Audre Slater Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$260k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$605kEducation$225kYouth Development$100kPublic Benefit$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $324k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $900k
  • $250k+1 grant · $260k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MADISON PROJECT$260,000
THE INDUSTRY$110,000
LACO$105,000
KIDS IN THE SPOTLIGHT$100,000
AMAZING GRACE CONSERVATORY$100,000
OJAI MUSIC FESTIVAL$100,000
USC KAUFMANN SCHOOL OF DANCE$85,000
DEAF WEST THEATRE$50,000
SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
KCRW$50,000
FERNANDO PULLMUN COMMUNITY ARTS CENTER$40,000
FOUNTAIN THEARTRE$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%URBAN VOICES PROJECT: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 9 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
10

Total granted

$1.2M
$588k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+13%

Still filing today

78%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $745k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Arts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MP
    MADISON PROJECT
    2× · 2024–2025 · $360k · revenue +38%
  • TI
    THE INDUSTRY PRODUCTIONS INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $210k · revenue -41%
  • KI
    KIDS IN THE SPOTLIGHT INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $200k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • RG
    RUSKIN GROUP THEATER
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • SM
    SANTA MONICA COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles International Dance Festival
—
2
Foundation for Modern Opera
—
3
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
4
Camerata Pacifica

Camerata Pacifica's mission is to affect positively how people experience live performances of classical music. The Organization will engage our audience intellectually and emotionally by presenting the finest performance of familiar and…

Arts & Culture
5
The Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra Society Inc

The orchestra pursues its mission, "to enrich and connect our community through intimate and transformative musical experiences which exemplify and foster artistic excellence, education and innovation," through the blend of traditional…

Arts & Culture
6
Los Angeles Performance Practice

As creative producers, we are devoted to the production and presentation of groundbreaking experiences in contemporary performance that use innovative approaches to collaboration, technology, and social engagement. As a service…

Arts & Culture
7
Opera Santa Barbara

See schedule 0founded in 1994, opera santa barbara is the signature provider of professional opera on the california central coast. we aspire to be a cultural leader in the santa barbara region, voicing and advancing our community's spirit…

Arts & Culture
8
California Bach Society Inc

Choral Music Performances: California Bach Society is a 30-voice chamber choir known for finely wrought interpretations of Renaissance and Baroque music, often accompanied by leading period instrumentalists. Each season, the choir performs…

—
9
Latino Theater Company

The latino theater company operates the los angeles theatre center, whose mission is to provide a world class arts center for those pursuing artistic excellence; a laboratory where both tradition and innovation are honored and honed; a…

Arts & Culture
10
Los Angeles Master Chorale Association
Arts & Culture
11
Cabrillo Festival of Contemporary Music

To transform the orchestral experience for artists and audiences by building a vibrant community dedicated to the creation and performance of profound, relevant and innovative music

—
12
The Santa Fe Opera

To further the operatic art form by presenting ensemble performances of the highest quality in a varied repertoire of new as well as rarely performed and standard works, to ensure excellence of opera's future through its apprentice…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pacific Opera Project; the most unlike its peers is Verdi Chorus co Francoise Sorgen-Goldschmidt. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
7/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MADISON PROJECT: $360,000 · Arts & CultureMADISON PROJECTTHE INDUSTRY PRODUCTIONS INC: $210,000 · Arts & CultureTHE INDUSTRY PRODUCTIONS INCOJAI FESTIVALS LTD: $200,000 · Arts & CultureOJAI FESTIVALS LTDAMAZING GRACE CONSERVATORY INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureAMAZING GRACE CONSERVATORY INCSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $50,000 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $50,000 · Arts & CultureTHE OPERA BUFFS INC CO MONA LANDS: $50,000 · Arts & Culture+9 more: $135,000 · Arts & Culture+9 moreLACO: $115,000 · OtherLACORUSKIN GROUP THEATER: $100,000 · OtherRUSKIN GROUP THEATERIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSANTA MONICA COLLEGE: $100,000 · OtherSANTA MONICA COLLEGEMADISON PROJ DBA BROADSTAGE: $100,000 · OtherMADISON PROJ DBA BROADSTAGEUSC KAUFMANN SCHOOL OF DANCE: $85,000 · OtherUSC KAUFMANN SCHOOL OF DANCEKCRW: $50,000 · OtherWILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherBROADSTATE: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherDEAF WEST THEATRE: $50,000 · OtherFOUNTAIN THEATRE: $45,000 · OtherFERNANDO PULLMUN COMMUNITY ARTS CENTER: $40,000 · Other+7 more: $113,000 · Other+7 moreKIDS IN THE SPOTLIGHT INC: $200,000 · Youth DevelopmentUCLA FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationURBAN VOICES PROJECT: $25,000 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$1,155,000Other$1,148,000Youth Development$200,000Education$125,000Human Services$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMADISON PROJECT: $360,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetTHE INDUSTRY PRODUCTIONS INC: $210,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetKIDS IN THE SPOTLIGHT INC: $200,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetOJAI FESTIVALS LTD: $200,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE OPERA BUFFS INC CO MONA LANDS: $50,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetFOUNTAIN THEATRE: $45,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetELEMENTAL MUSIC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetURBAN VOICES PROJECT: $25,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBODY TRAFFIC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCalifornia Dance Institute: $25,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetPACIFIC OPERA PROJECT: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDELIRIUM MUSICUM: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMUSICARES FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MADISON PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE INDUSTRY PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS IN THE SPOTLIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds OJAI FESTIVALS LTD ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMAZING GRACE CONSERVATORY INC ↗
  • Who funds SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA ↗
  • Who funds THE OPERA BUFFS INC CO MONA LANDS ↗
  • Who funds FOUNTAIN THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds ELEMENTAL MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN VOICES PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTS BRIDGING THE GAP ↗
  • Who funds BODY TRAFFIC ↗
  • Who funds California Dance Institute ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC OPERA PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Verdi Chorus co Francoise Sorgen-Goldschmidt ↗
  • Who funds OJAI PLAYWRIGHTS CONFERENCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Los Angeles Philanthropic Committee for the Arts · Colburn Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Audre Slater Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Audre Slater Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Audre Slater Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Audre Slater Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Audre Slater’s filings →

    More from the funding graph