Skip to content
The Association of Junior Leagues International Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Association of Junior Leagues International Inc

To advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration and training.

$396k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$350k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Public Benefit$350kCommunity Improvement$196k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $350,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $396,363 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $46,363 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$350,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOMENS SUFFRAGE NATIONAL MONUMENT FOUNDATION$350,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Junior League of Wilmington Inc: $10k → 10%The Junior League of Philadelphia Inc: $10k → 10%Junior League of the City of New York Inc: $10k → 17%The Junior League of Houston Inc: $10k → 16%Junior League of El Paso Inc: $10k → 21%Junior League of Tulsa Inc: $15k → 15%Junior League of Fort Smith Inc: $21k → 17%WOMENS SUFFRAGE NATIONAL MONUMENT FOUNDATION: $350k → 14%The Junior League of Birmingham Inc: $10k → 16%Junior League of Montgomery Inc: $11k → 18%The Junior League of Wichita Inc: $10k → 16%The Junior League of Kansas City Missouri: $10k → 15%The Junior League of Indianapolis Inc: $25k → 16%Junior League of Columbus Inc: $15k → 15%Junior League of Seattle: $11k → 9%Junior League of Birmingham Inc: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
NY
IN
OH
PA
MO
DE
KS
AR
DC
OK
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Junior League of Little Rock Inc

The junior league of little rock is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement
2
Junior League of Memphis

The Junior League of Memphis is an organization of women whose mission is to advance womens leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration and training.

Community Improvement
3
The Junior League of Austin Inc

The junior league of austin is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement
4
Junior League of Tucson Inc

The Junior League of Tucson, Inc., is an organization of women whose mission is to advance womens leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement
5
Junior League of Oklahoma City Oklahoma Inc

The junior league of oklahoma city, oklahoma, incorporated, is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement
6
The Junior League of Jackson Ms Inc

The junior league of jackson is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement
7
Junior League of Albuquerque Inc

The junior league of albuquerque is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement
8
Junior League of York Inc

The junior league of york is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement
9
The Junior League of Boston Inc

The junior league of boston is an organization of women committed to promoting voluntarism, developing the potential of women, and improving communities through the effective action and leadership of trained volunteers. its purpose is…

—
10
Junior League of Winston-Salem Inc

The junior league of winston-salem, inc is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement
11
Junior League of Daytona Beach Inc

The junior league of daytona beach is an organization of women whose mission is to advance womens leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training. the junior league of daytona beach reaches…

Community Improvement
12
Junior League of the Great Lakes Bay Region

Organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Junior League of Montgomery Inc; the most unlike its peers is Womens Suffrage National Monument Found. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Womens Suffrage National Monument Found: $350,000 · Arts & CultureWomens Suffrage National Monument FoundJUNIOR LEAGUE OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $25,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF INDIANAPOLIS INCJUNIOR LEAGUE OF FORT SMITH INC: $21,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF FORT SMITH INCJUNIOR LEAGUE OF BIRMINGHAM INC: $18,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF BIRMINGHAM INCJunior League of Tulsa Inc: $15,000 · Community ImprovementJunior League of Tulsa IncJUNIOR LEAGUE OF COLUMBUS INC: $15,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF COLUMBUS INCJUNIOR LEAGUE OF MONTGOMERY INC: $11,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF MONTGOMERY INCJUNIOR LEAGUE OF SEATTLE: $11,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF SEATTLETHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF THE CHAMPLAIN VALLEY INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF PHILADELPHIA INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF WILMINGTON INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF KANSAS CITY MISSOURI: $10,000 · Community ImprovementThe Junior League of Houston Inc: $10,000 · Community ImprovementTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF WICHITA INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF EL PASO INC: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Arts & Culture$350,000Community Improvement$196,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF FORT SMITH INC: $21,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF BIRMINGHAM INC: $18,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetJunior League of Tulsa Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF COLUMBUS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF MONTGOMERY INC: $11,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF SEATTLE: $11,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF THE CHAMPLAIN VALLEY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF PHILADELPHIA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF WILMINGTON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF KANSAS CITY MISSOURI: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetThe Junior League of Houston Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF WICHITA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF EL PASO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Association of Junior Leagues International Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Association of Junior Leagues International Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Junior League of Wilmington Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Association of Junior Leagues International’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home