Skip to content

New York · Public charity

The Association of Junior Leagues International Inc

To advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration and training. The purpose of the association is to add value to its leagues and their members in fulfillment of the junior league mission.

$396k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Itemized grants FY2025
4
Organizations funded FY2023
75%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$350k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$350,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$350,000
Organizations funded a year
3 to 9
FY2021 to FY2023
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$8.5M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 75% of the organizations The Association of Junior Leagues International Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 81% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving1$350k100%
FY20234$43k75%
FY20223$30k100%
FY20219$123kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Public Benefit$350kCommunity Improvement$196k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
NY
IN
OH
PA
MO
DE
KS
AR
DC
OK
AL
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 16 grantees

Where it is load-bearing

The Association of Junior Leagues International Inc supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 15 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJunior League of Indianapolis Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetJunior League of Fort Smith Inc: $21,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetJunior League of Birmingham Inc: $18,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetJunior League of Tulsa Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetJunior League of Columbus Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetJunior League of Montgomery Inc: $11,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetJunior League of Seattle: $11,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetThe Junior League of the Champlain Valley Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetThe Junior League of Philadelphia Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetJunior League of the City of New York Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJunior League of Wilmington Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetJunior League of Kansas City Missouri: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetThe Junior League of Houston Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Junior League of Wichita Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetJunior League of El Paso Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 15.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Association of Junior Leagues International Inc with peer funders

About The Association of Junior Leagues International Inc

How much does The Association of Junior Leagues International Inc give?
The Association of Junior Leagues International Inc reported 1 itemized grants totaling $350,000, out of $396,363 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 9 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2023.
What does The Association of Junior Leagues International Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2025, its largest causes are Public Benefit (64%), Community Improvement (36%).
Who are The Association of Junior Leagues International Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2025: Womens Suffrage National Monument Found ($350k), Junior League of Indianapolis Inc ($25k), Junior League of Fort Smith Inc ($21k).
Does The Association of Junior Leagues International Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 75% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Association of Junior Leagues International Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc, Jpmorgan Chase Foundation, American Online Giving Foundation Inc.
Where is The Association of Junior Leagues International Inc based?
The Association of Junior Leagues International Inc is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Association of Junior Leagues International’s filings →

More from the funding graph