Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Association of Junior Leagues International Inc

To advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration and training.

$396k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$350k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20212025.

Arts & Culture$350kCommunity Improvement$196k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $350,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $396,363 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $46,363 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$350,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOMENS SUFFRAGE NATIONAL MONUMENT FOUNDATION$350,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 94% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Junior League of Wilmington Inc: $10k → 10%The Junior League of Philadelphia Inc: $10k → 10%Junior League of the City of New York Inc: $10k → 17%The Junior League of Houston Inc: $10k → 16%Junior League of El Paso Inc: $10k → 21%Junior League of Tulsa Inc: $15k → 15%Junior League of Fort Smith Inc: $21k → 17%WOMENS SUFFRAGE NATIONAL MONUMENT FOUNDATION: $350k → 14%The Junior League of Birmingham Inc: $10k → 16%Junior League of Montgomery Inc: $11k → 18%The Junior League of Wichita Inc: $10k → 16%The Junior League of Kansas City Missouri: $10k → 15%The Junior League of Indianapolis Inc: $25k → 16%Junior League of Columbus Inc: $15k → 15%Junior League of Seattle: $11k → 9%Junior League of Birmingham Inc: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
NY
IN
OH
PA
MO
DE
KS
AR
DC
OK
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Junior League of Little Rock Inc

The junior league of little rock is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement
2
Junior League of Memphis

The Junior League of Memphis is an organization of women whose mission is to advance womens leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration and training.

Community Improvement
3
The Junior League of Austin Inc

The junior league of austin is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement
4
Junior League of Tucson Inc

The Junior League of Tucson, Inc., is an organization of women whose mission is to advance womens leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement
5
Junior League of Oklahoma City Oklahoma Inc

The junior league of oklahoma city, oklahoma, incorporated, is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement
6
The Junior League of Jackson Ms Inc

The junior league of jackson is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement
7
Junior League of Albuquerque Inc

The junior league of albuquerque is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement
8
Junior League of York Inc

The junior league of york is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement
9
The Junior League of Boston Inc

The junior league of boston is an organization of women committed to promoting voluntarism, developing the potential of women, and improving communities through the effective action and leadership of trained volunteers. its purpose is…

10
Junior League of Winston-Salem Inc

The junior league of winston-salem, inc is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement
11
Junior League of Daytona Beach Inc

The junior league of daytona beach is an organization of women whose mission is to advance womens leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training. the junior league of daytona beach reaches…

Community Improvement
12
Junior League of the Great Lakes Bay Region

Organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Junior League of Montgomery Inc and the most unlike its peers is Womens Suffrage National Monument Found. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Womens Suffrage National Monument Found — $350,000 · Arts & CultureWomens Suffrage National Monument FoundJUNIOR LEAGUE OF INDIANAPOLIS INC — $25,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF INDIANAPOLIS INCJUNIOR LEAGUE OF FORT SMITH INC — $21,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF FORT SMITH INCJUNIOR LEAGUE OF BIRMINGHAM INC — $18,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF BIRMINGHAM INCJUNIOR LEAGUE OF COLUMBUS INC — $15,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF COLUMBUS INCJunior League of Tulsa Inc — $15,000 · Community ImprovementJunior League of Tulsa IncJUNIOR LEAGUE OF MONTGOMERY INC — $11,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF MONTGOMERY INCJUNIOR LEAGUE OF SEATTLE — $11,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF SEATTLETHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF THE CHAMPLAIN VALLEY INC — $10,000 · Community ImprovementThe Junior League of Houston Inc — $10,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC — $10,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF EL PASO INC — $10,000 · Community ImprovementTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF PHILADELPHIA INC — $10,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF WILMINGTON INC — $10,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF KANSAS CITY MISSOURI — $10,000 · Community ImprovementTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF WICHITA INC — $10,000 · Community Improvement
Arts & Culture$350,000Community Improvement$196,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF INDIANAPOLIS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF FORT SMITH INC — $21,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF BIRMINGHAM INC — $18,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF COLUMBUS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetJunior League of Tulsa Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF MONTGOMERY INC — $11,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF SEATTLE — $11,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF THE CHAMPLAIN VALLEY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetThe Junior League of Houston Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF EL PASO INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF PHILADELPHIA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF WILMINGTON INC — $10,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF KANSAS CITY MISSOURI — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF WICHITA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Association of Junior Leagues International Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • Junior League of Wilmington Inc6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph